调查单手和双手设备间的交互

Q3 Computer Science
Huang Zheng, Limke Jed, Kong Jun
{"title":"调查单手和双手设备间的交互","authors":"Huang Zheng,&nbsp;Limke Jed,&nbsp;Kong Jun","doi":"10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Using a mobile device together with a large shared screen supports collaborative tasks and potentially prevents interference among users. In order to evaluate the usability of inter-device interaction, this paper compared two fundamental inter-device interaction styles, i.e., one-handed and two-handed interaction. The one-handed interaction style only uses one hand to select an object from a large display device while the two-handed interaction style needs the cooperation of two hands to realize a selection. A framework was developed to implement these two interaction styles. Based on the framework, a pretest-posttest, repeated-measures study was conducted to compare their differences. All participants went through eight tasks, which were differentiated by both the selection order (sequential or random order) and the density level (sparse or dense layout), using both interaction styles. During the study, both the completion time and the error rate in each task with each interaction style were recorded. In addition, the IBM Post-Study Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used to evaluate the </span>subjective satisfaction on each interaction style. The overall PSSUQ score indicates that both interaction styles receive positive feedback with high user satisfaction. The study also revealed that the one-handed interaction took less time to complete tasks (i.e., more efficient) than the two-handed interaction, while the two-handed interaction style had a lower error rate than the one-handed interaction, and especially so in a dense layout.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54754,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing","volume":"42 ","pages":"Pages 1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.07.001","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating one-handed and two-handed inter-device interaction\",\"authors\":\"Huang Zheng,&nbsp;Limke Jed,&nbsp;Kong Jun\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Using a mobile device together with a large shared screen supports collaborative tasks and potentially prevents interference among users. In order to evaluate the usability of inter-device interaction, this paper compared two fundamental inter-device interaction styles, i.e., one-handed and two-handed interaction. The one-handed interaction style only uses one hand to select an object from a large display device while the two-handed interaction style needs the cooperation of two hands to realize a selection. A framework was developed to implement these two interaction styles. Based on the framework, a pretest-posttest, repeated-measures study was conducted to compare their differences. All participants went through eight tasks, which were differentiated by both the selection order (sequential or random order) and the density level (sparse or dense layout), using both interaction styles. During the study, both the completion time and the error rate in each task with each interaction style were recorded. In addition, the IBM Post-Study Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used to evaluate the </span>subjective satisfaction on each interaction style. The overall PSSUQ score indicates that both interaction styles receive positive feedback with high user satisfaction. The study also revealed that the one-handed interaction took less time to complete tasks (i.e., more efficient) than the two-handed interaction, while the two-handed interaction style had a lower error rate than the one-handed interaction, and especially so in a dense layout.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing\",\"volume\":\"42 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.07.001\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045926X17300307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Computer Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Visual Languages and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1045926X17300307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

将移动设备与大共享屏幕一起使用支持协作任务,并有可能防止用户之间的干扰。为了评估设备间交互的可用性,本文比较了两种基本的设备间交互风格,即单手交互和双手交互。单手交互风格只使用一只手从大型显示设备中选择对象,而双手交互风格需要两只手的合作来实现选择。开发了一个框架来实现这两种交互风格。基于该框架,进行了前测后测、重复测量研究,以比较它们的差异。所有参与者都完成了八项任务,使用两种交互风格,根据选择顺序(顺序或随机顺序)和密度水平(稀疏或密集布局)进行区分。在研究过程中,记录了每项任务的完成时间和每种互动风格的错误率。此外,IBM研究后可用性问卷(PSSUQ)用于评估对每种互动风格的主观满意度。PSSUQ的总体得分表明,两种交互风格都获得了具有高用户满意度的积极反馈。研究还表明,单手交互比双手交互花更少的时间完成任务(即更高效),而双手交互风格的错误率比单手交互低,尤其是在密集布局中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating one-handed and two-handed inter-device interaction

Using a mobile device together with a large shared screen supports collaborative tasks and potentially prevents interference among users. In order to evaluate the usability of inter-device interaction, this paper compared two fundamental inter-device interaction styles, i.e., one-handed and two-handed interaction. The one-handed interaction style only uses one hand to select an object from a large display device while the two-handed interaction style needs the cooperation of two hands to realize a selection. A framework was developed to implement these two interaction styles. Based on the framework, a pretest-posttest, repeated-measures study was conducted to compare their differences. All participants went through eight tasks, which were differentiated by both the selection order (sequential or random order) and the density level (sparse or dense layout), using both interaction styles. During the study, both the completion time and the error rate in each task with each interaction style were recorded. In addition, the IBM Post-Study Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ) was used to evaluate the subjective satisfaction on each interaction style. The overall PSSUQ score indicates that both interaction styles receive positive feedback with high user satisfaction. The study also revealed that the one-handed interaction took less time to complete tasks (i.e., more efficient) than the two-handed interaction, while the two-handed interaction style had a lower error rate than the one-handed interaction, and especially so in a dense layout.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing
Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
1.62
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26.8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Visual Languages and Computing is a forum for researchers, practitioners, and developers to exchange ideas and results for the advancement of visual languages and its implication to the art of computing. The journal publishes research papers, state-of-the-art surveys, and review articles in all aspects of visual languages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信