腹壁通气的治疗

J.-P. Lechaux, D. Lechaux, J.-P. Chevrel
{"title":"腹壁通气的治疗","authors":"J.-P. Lechaux,&nbsp;D. Lechaux,&nbsp;J.-P. Chevrel","doi":"10.1016/j.emcchi.2004.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incisional hernias occur in about 13 to 20 % of patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures. They entail a large financial burden with high cumulative rate of reoperative repairs. Development of minimally invasive surgery got rid of occurrence of large hernias but might induce a new concept, the limited port-site hernias. Anatomical reconstitution with closure of linea alba by suture or autoplasty has been shown to have a high recurrence rate. Tension free obturation of the defect with a prosthetic mesh is becoming the procedure of choice for any hernia whatever the size. The recurrence rate has been reduced to less than 10 %. Non absorbable synthetic biomaterials are widely used. Macroporous meshes (polypropylene, polyester) have a high adhesion rate unsuitable for direct contact with the bowel as opposed to microporous one (e PTFE). Newer composite biomaterials with an anti-adhesive inner surface are available for intraperitoneal placement. Current sites of mesh implantation are intraperitoneal, preperitoneal, retro muscular-prefascial, pre muscular-prefascial. Mesh reinforcement is also indicated for repair of muscle-splitting transverse or sub-costal hernias. In case of emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction or planned surgical procedure in patient presenting with incisional hernia, synchronous repair with mesh is mandatory. Non absorbable mesh can be used in the presence of open bowel. In a grossly contaminated field, absorbable mesh is advisable. The most commonly reported complication is seroma formation which generally resolved spontaneously. Infection is the second most common complication. Incidence, treatment and outcome depend on the nature of the biomaterial. In case of repeated repair for recurrence, a procedure different from that previously used with a prosthetic reinforcement must be performed. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia includes intraperitoneal placement of a composite biomaterial overlapping the margins of the defect without any attempt of anatomical reconstitution, nor resection of the hernia sac. Mesh is secured with a combination of non absorbable sutures through the abdominal wall and laparoscopically placed staples. The benefits are a decrease in surgical morbidity and hospital stay. Recurrence rate is reported to be equal or less than in the open repair. Drawbacks are a longer operative time, frequent difficulties of performing adhesiolysis with risk of bowel injuries and persistance of cutaneous changes. Laparoscopic approach is mainly indicated for small sized hernias with a reductible content.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100414,"journal":{"name":"EMC - Chirurgie","volume":"1 6","pages":"Pages 601-619"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.emcchi.2004.08.004","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traitement des éventrations de la paroi abdominale\",\"authors\":\"J.-P. Lechaux,&nbsp;D. Lechaux,&nbsp;J.-P. Chevrel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emcchi.2004.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Incisional hernias occur in about 13 to 20 % of patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures. They entail a large financial burden with high cumulative rate of reoperative repairs. Development of minimally invasive surgery got rid of occurrence of large hernias but might induce a new concept, the limited port-site hernias. Anatomical reconstitution with closure of linea alba by suture or autoplasty has been shown to have a high recurrence rate. Tension free obturation of the defect with a prosthetic mesh is becoming the procedure of choice for any hernia whatever the size. The recurrence rate has been reduced to less than 10 %. Non absorbable synthetic biomaterials are widely used. Macroporous meshes (polypropylene, polyester) have a high adhesion rate unsuitable for direct contact with the bowel as opposed to microporous one (e PTFE). Newer composite biomaterials with an anti-adhesive inner surface are available for intraperitoneal placement. Current sites of mesh implantation are intraperitoneal, preperitoneal, retro muscular-prefascial, pre muscular-prefascial. Mesh reinforcement is also indicated for repair of muscle-splitting transverse or sub-costal hernias. In case of emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction or planned surgical procedure in patient presenting with incisional hernia, synchronous repair with mesh is mandatory. Non absorbable mesh can be used in the presence of open bowel. In a grossly contaminated field, absorbable mesh is advisable. The most commonly reported complication is seroma formation which generally resolved spontaneously. Infection is the second most common complication. Incidence, treatment and outcome depend on the nature of the biomaterial. In case of repeated repair for recurrence, a procedure different from that previously used with a prosthetic reinforcement must be performed. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia includes intraperitoneal placement of a composite biomaterial overlapping the margins of the defect without any attempt of anatomical reconstitution, nor resection of the hernia sac. Mesh is secured with a combination of non absorbable sutures through the abdominal wall and laparoscopically placed staples. The benefits are a decrease in surgical morbidity and hospital stay. Recurrence rate is reported to be equal or less than in the open repair. Drawbacks are a longer operative time, frequent difficulties of performing adhesiolysis with risk of bowel injuries and persistance of cutaneous changes. Laparoscopic approach is mainly indicated for small sized hernias with a reductible content.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EMC - Chirurgie\",\"volume\":\"1 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 601-619\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.emcchi.2004.08.004\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EMC - Chirurgie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1762570X04000544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMC - Chirurgie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1762570X04000544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在接受腹部手术的患者中,约有13%至20%发生切口疝。它们带来了巨大的财政负担,重新开放维修的累积率很高。微创手术的发展消除了大面积疝的发生,但可能会引入一个新的概念,即有限端口疝。通过缝合或自体成形术闭合白线的解剖重建已被证明具有高复发率。对于任何大小的疝,用人工网片无张力充填缺损正成为首选手术。复发率已降至10%以下。非吸收性合成生物材料应用广泛。与微孔网(e PTFE)相比,大孔网(聚丙烯、聚酯)具有不适合与肠道直接接触的高粘附率。具有抗粘连内表面的新型复合生物材料可用于腹膜内植入。目前的网状物植入部位有腹膜内、腹膜前、肌后-骶前、肌前-骶前。网状物加固也适用于肌裂性横疝或肋下疝的修复。在肠梗阻的紧急剖腹手术或切口疝患者的计划手术中,必须使用网状物进行同步修复。非吸收性网状物可用于开放性肠道。在污染严重的田地里,建议使用可吸收网布。最常见的并发症是血清瘤形成,通常会自行消退。感染是第二常见的并发症。发病率、治疗和结果取决于生物材料的性质。在重复修复复发的情况下,必须执行与以前使用的假体加固不同的程序。腹腔镜下切口疝的治疗方法包括腹膜内放置复合生物材料,与缺损边缘重叠,而无需进行任何解剖重建,也无需切除疝囊。网状物由穿过腹壁的不可吸收缝线和腹腔镜放置的缝合钉组合固定。其好处是减少了手术发病率和住院时间。据报告,复发率等于或小于开放修复中的复发率。缺点是手术时间较长,经常难以进行粘连松解,有肠损伤的风险,以及皮肤变化的持续性。腹腔镜入路主要适用于内容物可还原的小疝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Traitement des éventrations de la paroi abdominale

Incisional hernias occur in about 13 to 20 % of patients undergoing abdominal surgical procedures. They entail a large financial burden with high cumulative rate of reoperative repairs. Development of minimally invasive surgery got rid of occurrence of large hernias but might induce a new concept, the limited port-site hernias. Anatomical reconstitution with closure of linea alba by suture or autoplasty has been shown to have a high recurrence rate. Tension free obturation of the defect with a prosthetic mesh is becoming the procedure of choice for any hernia whatever the size. The recurrence rate has been reduced to less than 10 %. Non absorbable synthetic biomaterials are widely used. Macroporous meshes (polypropylene, polyester) have a high adhesion rate unsuitable for direct contact with the bowel as opposed to microporous one (e PTFE). Newer composite biomaterials with an anti-adhesive inner surface are available for intraperitoneal placement. Current sites of mesh implantation are intraperitoneal, preperitoneal, retro muscular-prefascial, pre muscular-prefascial. Mesh reinforcement is also indicated for repair of muscle-splitting transverse or sub-costal hernias. In case of emergency laparotomy for intestinal obstruction or planned surgical procedure in patient presenting with incisional hernia, synchronous repair with mesh is mandatory. Non absorbable mesh can be used in the presence of open bowel. In a grossly contaminated field, absorbable mesh is advisable. The most commonly reported complication is seroma formation which generally resolved spontaneously. Infection is the second most common complication. Incidence, treatment and outcome depend on the nature of the biomaterial. In case of repeated repair for recurrence, a procedure different from that previously used with a prosthetic reinforcement must be performed. Laparoscopic approach to incisional hernia includes intraperitoneal placement of a composite biomaterial overlapping the margins of the defect without any attempt of anatomical reconstitution, nor resection of the hernia sac. Mesh is secured with a combination of non absorbable sutures through the abdominal wall and laparoscopically placed staples. The benefits are a decrease in surgical morbidity and hospital stay. Recurrence rate is reported to be equal or less than in the open repair. Drawbacks are a longer operative time, frequent difficulties of performing adhesiolysis with risk of bowel injuries and persistance of cutaneous changes. Laparoscopic approach is mainly indicated for small sized hernias with a reductible content.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信