阶梯:知识获取中的技术和工具使用

C. Corbridge, G. Rugg, N.P. Major, N.R. Shadbolt, A.M. Burton
{"title":"阶梯:知识获取中的技术和工具使用","authors":"C. Corbridge,&nbsp;G. Rugg,&nbsp;N.P. Major,&nbsp;N.R. Shadbolt,&nbsp;A.M. Burton","doi":"10.1006/knac.1994.1016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Laddering is a structured questioning technique derived from the repertory grid technique, enabling a hierarchy of concepts to be established. Previous empirical studies have demonstrated its utility for knowledge elicitation in two classificatory domains. In this paper, three experimental studies of laddering are described. In experiment 1, the technique was used in another classificatory domain, metallic corrosion, and the effects of repeated exposure to the technique and feedback, in the form of Pseudo-English Production Rules, were investigated. These variables had no effect on the productivity of the technique. Experiment 2 compared the laddering technique with three other techniques in a medical diagnostic domain. As in previous studies laddering was found to be the most productive technique despite the change in the type of domain about which knowledge was elicited. In experiment 3, the preferences of subjects interviewed using two versions of the laddering technique, \"textual\" and \"graphical\", were compared with those obtained when the subjects were interviewed using a computerised laddering tool. Although the \"gain\" obtained in the three conditions varied, the group of subjects did not prefer one type of laddering to another. The laddering tool used in the experiment was designed as one tool in an integrated Knowledge Engineering Workbench (KEW). The potential for synergy between the laddering tool and other knowledge acquisition techniques implemented within KEW is explored. Guidance and advice concerning the appropriate context to employ laddering within the knowledge acquisition process is provided.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100857,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge Acquisition","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 315-341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/knac.1994.1016","citationCount":"103","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Laddering: technique and tool use in knowledge acquisition\",\"authors\":\"C. Corbridge,&nbsp;G. Rugg,&nbsp;N.P. Major,&nbsp;N.R. Shadbolt,&nbsp;A.M. Burton\",\"doi\":\"10.1006/knac.1994.1016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Laddering is a structured questioning technique derived from the repertory grid technique, enabling a hierarchy of concepts to be established. Previous empirical studies have demonstrated its utility for knowledge elicitation in two classificatory domains. In this paper, three experimental studies of laddering are described. In experiment 1, the technique was used in another classificatory domain, metallic corrosion, and the effects of repeated exposure to the technique and feedback, in the form of Pseudo-English Production Rules, were investigated. These variables had no effect on the productivity of the technique. Experiment 2 compared the laddering technique with three other techniques in a medical diagnostic domain. As in previous studies laddering was found to be the most productive technique despite the change in the type of domain about which knowledge was elicited. In experiment 3, the preferences of subjects interviewed using two versions of the laddering technique, \\\"textual\\\" and \\\"graphical\\\", were compared with those obtained when the subjects were interviewed using a computerised laddering tool. Although the \\\"gain\\\" obtained in the three conditions varied, the group of subjects did not prefer one type of laddering to another. The laddering tool used in the experiment was designed as one tool in an integrated Knowledge Engineering Workbench (KEW). The potential for synergy between the laddering tool and other knowledge acquisition techniques implemented within KEW is explored. Guidance and advice concerning the appropriate context to employ laddering within the knowledge acquisition process is provided.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knowledge Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 315-341\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1006/knac.1994.1016\",\"citationCount\":\"103\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knowledge Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042814384710168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042814384710168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 103

摘要

阶梯式提问是一种结构化的提问技术,源于剧目网格技术,能够建立概念的层次结构。先前的实证研究已经在两个分类领域证明了它对知识启发的效用。本文介绍了三个阶梯法的实验研究。在实验1中,该技术被用于另一个分类领域,金属腐蚀,并研究了重复暴露于该技术和以伪英语生产规则形式的反馈的影响。这些变量对该技术的生产率没有影响。实验2将阶梯技术与医学诊断领域的其他三种技术进行了比较。与之前的研究一样,尽管引发知识的领域类型发生了变化,但阶梯法被发现是最有效的技术。在实验3中,使用“文本”和“图形”两种阶梯技术采访的受试者的偏好与使用计算机阶梯工具采访受试者时获得的偏好进行了比较。尽管在这三种条件下获得的“增益”各不相同,但这组受试者并不喜欢一种阶梯式。实验中使用的阶梯工具被设计为集成知识工程工作台(KEW)中的一个工具。探索了阶梯工具与KEW内实施的其他知识获取技术之间的协同潜力。提供了关于在知识获取过程中采用阶梯法的适当背景的指导和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Laddering: technique and tool use in knowledge acquisition

Laddering is a structured questioning technique derived from the repertory grid technique, enabling a hierarchy of concepts to be established. Previous empirical studies have demonstrated its utility for knowledge elicitation in two classificatory domains. In this paper, three experimental studies of laddering are described. In experiment 1, the technique was used in another classificatory domain, metallic corrosion, and the effects of repeated exposure to the technique and feedback, in the form of Pseudo-English Production Rules, were investigated. These variables had no effect on the productivity of the technique. Experiment 2 compared the laddering technique with three other techniques in a medical diagnostic domain. As in previous studies laddering was found to be the most productive technique despite the change in the type of domain about which knowledge was elicited. In experiment 3, the preferences of subjects interviewed using two versions of the laddering technique, "textual" and "graphical", were compared with those obtained when the subjects were interviewed using a computerised laddering tool. Although the "gain" obtained in the three conditions varied, the group of subjects did not prefer one type of laddering to another. The laddering tool used in the experiment was designed as one tool in an integrated Knowledge Engineering Workbench (KEW). The potential for synergy between the laddering tool and other knowledge acquisition techniques implemented within KEW is explored. Guidance and advice concerning the appropriate context to employ laddering within the knowledge acquisition process is provided.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信