《1972年至2021年经济笔记》前50年概述

Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1111/ecno.12211
Giovanni Ferri
{"title":"《1972年至2021年经济笔记》前50年概述","authors":"Giovanni Ferri","doi":"10.1111/ecno.12211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We review the five different phases lived by <i>Economic Notes</i> during its first 50 years. First, its foundation and early phase—until 1983—received great support from Monte dei Paschi and also benefited from a windfall since Robert A. Mundell attracted to Siena an international network of top economists, policy makers and executives, facilitating high-quality submissions to the <i>Journal</i>. When Mundell's meetings stopped (in 1978), <i>Economic Notes</i> had already secured a good reputation and had become a champion of a pluralist approach, accepting papers from different disciplines and views. In the second phase—from 1984 to the mid-1990s—the <i>Journal</i>, led by a qualified Editorial Board lived continuity but also some new directions emerged. <i>Economic Notes</i> became better connected to the local Faculty of Economics. Also, the drive towards pluralism of the early years was refocused to safeguard access by different economic schools rather than different disciplines. In those years, Monte dei Paschi too transformed from a mostly regional bank into a national and international player, thus demanding less visibility support from the <i>Journal</i>. Those events blurred the initial mission and started distancing the Bank from the <i>Journal</i>. The third phase—from mid-1990s to early 2000s—saw the maximum productivity and visibility of <i>Economic Notes</i>. Monte financed Conferences with great resonance also owing to an exceptional Advisory Board. In the fourth phase—from 2004, when the Conferences became rare, to 2012—the performance worsened. Communication between the Bank and the <i>Journal</i> grew more difficult, complicating any planning for the future. The fifth phase— from 2012 to 2019—aimed to relaunch the <i>Journal</i> without a significant support from the Bank, which had entered a period of difficulties of its own. The planned way out of this situation was to develop a series of Special Issues through dedicated Calls for Papers. As we show, that strategy delivered some results and, in effect, <i>Economic Notes</i>’ performance rebounded. Nevertheless, Monte was progressively disengaging from the <i>Journal</i>, which, eventually, was sold to Wiley, the publishing partner. The sixth and last phase of the <i>Journal</i>—from 2019 to 2021—under the new ownership by Wiley marked a gradual transformation. In the end, it seems that the publishing venture initiated in 1972 is still making progress and providing a pluralist forum for discussion. The journey of <i>Economic Notes</i> is still on!</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"General overview of the first 50 years of Economic Notes, 1972–2021\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Ferri\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ecno.12211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We review the five different phases lived by <i>Economic Notes</i> during its first 50 years. First, its foundation and early phase—until 1983—received great support from Monte dei Paschi and also benefited from a windfall since Robert A. Mundell attracted to Siena an international network of top economists, policy makers and executives, facilitating high-quality submissions to the <i>Journal</i>. When Mundell's meetings stopped (in 1978), <i>Economic Notes</i> had already secured a good reputation and had become a champion of a pluralist approach, accepting papers from different disciplines and views. In the second phase—from 1984 to the mid-1990s—the <i>Journal</i>, led by a qualified Editorial Board lived continuity but also some new directions emerged. <i>Economic Notes</i> became better connected to the local Faculty of Economics. Also, the drive towards pluralism of the early years was refocused to safeguard access by different economic schools rather than different disciplines. In those years, Monte dei Paschi too transformed from a mostly regional bank into a national and international player, thus demanding less visibility support from the <i>Journal</i>. Those events blurred the initial mission and started distancing the Bank from the <i>Journal</i>. The third phase—from mid-1990s to early 2000s—saw the maximum productivity and visibility of <i>Economic Notes</i>. Monte financed Conferences with great resonance also owing to an exceptional Advisory Board. In the fourth phase—from 2004, when the Conferences became rare, to 2012—the performance worsened. Communication between the Bank and the <i>Journal</i> grew more difficult, complicating any planning for the future. The fifth phase— from 2012 to 2019—aimed to relaunch the <i>Journal</i> without a significant support from the Bank, which had entered a period of difficulties of its own. The planned way out of this situation was to develop a series of Special Issues through dedicated Calls for Papers. As we show, that strategy delivered some results and, in effect, <i>Economic Notes</i>’ performance rebounded. Nevertheless, Monte was progressively disengaging from the <i>Journal</i>, which, eventually, was sold to Wiley, the publishing partner. The sixth and last phase of the <i>Journal</i>—from 2019 to 2021—under the new ownership by Wiley marked a gradual transformation. In the end, it seems that the publishing venture initiated in 1972 is still making progress and providing a pluralist forum for discussion. The journey of <i>Economic Notes</i> is still on!</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.12211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecno.12211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们回顾了《经济笔记》前50年经历的五个不同阶段。首先,它的成立和早期阶段——直到1983年——得到了Monte dei Paschi的大力支持,也从Robert a.Mundell吸引了一个由顶级经济学家、政策制定者和高管组成的国际网络到锡耶纳,为向《华尔街日报》提交高质量的稿件提供了便利以来获得了意外之财。当蒙代尔的会议停止时(1978年),《经济笔记》已经获得了良好的声誉,并成为多元化方法的倡导者,接受来自不同学科和观点的论文。在1984年至1990年代中期的第二阶段,《华尔街日报》在一个合格的编辑委员会的领导下保持了连续性,但也出现了一些新的方向。《经济笔记》与当地经济学院的联系更加紧密。此外,早年的多元化运动被重新聚焦于保障不同经济学校而非不同学科的入学机会。在那些年里,Monte dei Paschi也从一家主要是地区性的银行转变为一家国家和国际性的银行,因此要求《华尔街日报》提供较少的知名度支持。这些事件模糊了最初的使命,并开始疏远《华尔街日报》。第三阶段——从20世纪90年代中期到21世纪初——见证了《经济笔记》的最大生产力和知名度。蒙特资助的会议引起了极大的共鸣,这也归功于一个杰出的咨询委员会。在第四阶段——从2004年会议变得罕见到2012年——表现恶化。世行和《华尔街日报》之间的沟通变得更加困难,使未来的任何计划都变得复杂。第五阶段——从2012年到2019年——旨在在没有世行大力支持的情况下重新推出《华尔街日报》,世行已经进入了自己的困难时期。有计划的解决办法是通过专门的文件征集来编写一系列特别问题。正如我们所展示的,这一策略取得了一些成果,实际上,经济票据的业绩有所回升。尽管如此,蒙特逐渐脱离了《华尔街日报》,该报最终被卖给了出版合伙人威利。《华尔街日报》的第六期也是最后一期,从2019年到2021年,在威利的新所有权下,标志着一个渐进的转变。最终,1972年发起的出版事业似乎仍在取得进展,并为讨论提供了一个多元化的论坛。《经济笔记》的旅程还在继续!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
General overview of the first 50 years of Economic Notes, 1972–2021

We review the five different phases lived by Economic Notes during its first 50 years. First, its foundation and early phase—until 1983—received great support from Monte dei Paschi and also benefited from a windfall since Robert A. Mundell attracted to Siena an international network of top economists, policy makers and executives, facilitating high-quality submissions to the Journal. When Mundell's meetings stopped (in 1978), Economic Notes had already secured a good reputation and had become a champion of a pluralist approach, accepting papers from different disciplines and views. In the second phase—from 1984 to the mid-1990s—the Journal, led by a qualified Editorial Board lived continuity but also some new directions emerged. Economic Notes became better connected to the local Faculty of Economics. Also, the drive towards pluralism of the early years was refocused to safeguard access by different economic schools rather than different disciplines. In those years, Monte dei Paschi too transformed from a mostly regional bank into a national and international player, thus demanding less visibility support from the Journal. Those events blurred the initial mission and started distancing the Bank from the Journal. The third phase—from mid-1990s to early 2000s—saw the maximum productivity and visibility of Economic Notes. Monte financed Conferences with great resonance also owing to an exceptional Advisory Board. In the fourth phase—from 2004, when the Conferences became rare, to 2012—the performance worsened. Communication between the Bank and the Journal grew more difficult, complicating any planning for the future. The fifth phase— from 2012 to 2019—aimed to relaunch the Journal without a significant support from the Bank, which had entered a period of difficulties of its own. The planned way out of this situation was to develop a series of Special Issues through dedicated Calls for Papers. As we show, that strategy delivered some results and, in effect, Economic Notes’ performance rebounded. Nevertheless, Monte was progressively disengaging from the Journal, which, eventually, was sold to Wiley, the publishing partner. The sixth and last phase of the Journal—from 2019 to 2021—under the new ownership by Wiley marked a gradual transformation. In the end, it seems that the publishing venture initiated in 1972 is still making progress and providing a pluralist forum for discussion. The journey of Economic Notes is still on!

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信