M.C. Montero-Balosa , R. Fernández-Urrusuno , J.R. Boxó-Cifuentes
{"title":"他汀类药物在无心血管疾病患者中的应用:一项关键综述","authors":"M.C. Montero-Balosa , R. Fernández-Urrusuno , J.R. Boxó-Cifuentes","doi":"10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70056-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>It shows a critical review of meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (period: January 2000 to December 2011) for meta-analysis of randomized trials conducted to study the effect of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We used PRISMA statement to evaluate accuracy and reliability of meta-analysis. We selected 9 meta-analysis (mean of patients: 88.006). Five studies found a benefit in mayor cardiovascular events (range of relative risk [RR]: 0.69–0.85). Seven meta-analysis obtained improvement in mayor coronary events (range of RR: 0.61–0.77). There was no agreement between the results of total mortality, coronary mortality and cerebrovascular events. This critical review of meta-analysis suggests a modest benefit of statins in a primary prevention set-up.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100520,"journal":{"name":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","volume":"10 2","pages":"Pages 36-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70056-0","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estatinas en pacientes sin enfermedad cardiovascular: una revisión crítica\",\"authors\":\"M.C. Montero-Balosa , R. Fernández-Urrusuno , J.R. Boxó-Cifuentes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70056-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>It shows a critical review of meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (period: January 2000 to December 2011) for meta-analysis of randomized trials conducted to study the effect of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We used PRISMA statement to evaluate accuracy and reliability of meta-analysis. We selected 9 meta-analysis (mean of patients: 88.006). Five studies found a benefit in mayor cardiovascular events (range of relative risk [RR]: 0.69–0.85). Seven meta-analysis obtained improvement in mayor coronary events (range of RR: 0.61–0.77). There was no agreement between the results of total mortality, coronary mortality and cerebrovascular events. This critical review of meta-analysis suggests a modest benefit of statins in a primary prevention set-up.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 36-43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S2172-3761(12)70056-0\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2172376112700560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Farmacéuticos de Atención Primaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2172376112700560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estatinas en pacientes sin enfermedad cardiovascular: una revisión crítica
It shows a critical review of meta-analysis assessing the efficacy of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane (period: January 2000 to December 2011) for meta-analysis of randomized trials conducted to study the effect of statins in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. We used PRISMA statement to evaluate accuracy and reliability of meta-analysis. We selected 9 meta-analysis (mean of patients: 88.006). Five studies found a benefit in mayor cardiovascular events (range of relative risk [RR]: 0.69–0.85). Seven meta-analysis obtained improvement in mayor coronary events (range of RR: 0.61–0.77). There was no agreement between the results of total mortality, coronary mortality and cerebrovascular events. This critical review of meta-analysis suggests a modest benefit of statins in a primary prevention set-up.