验证一种新的护理点超声方法来评估膈肌偏移。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Diogo Da Conceicao, Anahi Perlas, Laura Giron Arango, Kim Wild, Qixuan Li, Ella Huszti, Jayanta Chowdhury, Vincent Chan
{"title":"验证一种新的护理点超声方法来评估膈肌偏移。","authors":"Diogo Da Conceicao, Anahi Perlas, Laura Giron Arango, Kim Wild, Qixuan Li, Ella Huszti, Jayanta Chowdhury, Vincent Chan","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2023-104983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound can assess diaphragmatic function and rule in or rule out paresis of the diaphragm. While this is a useful bedside tool, established methods have significant limitations. This study explores a new method to assess diaphragmatic motion by measuring the excursion of the uppermost point of the zone of apposition (ZOA) at the mid-axillary line using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe and compares it with two previously established methods: the assessment of the excursion of the dome of the diaphragm (DOD) and the thickening ratio at the ZOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, prospective comparative study on elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function. Following research ethics board approval and patient written consent, 75 elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function were evaluated preoperatively. Three ultrasound methods were compared: (1) assessment of the excursion of the DOD using a curvilinear probe through an abdominal window; (2) assessment of the thickening fraction of the ZOA; and (3) assessment of the excursion of the ZOA. The last two methods performed with a linear probe on the lateral aspect of the chest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were studied. We found that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA was more consistently successful (100% bilaterally) than the evaluation of the excursion of the DOD (98.7% and 34.7% on the right and left sides, respectively). The absolute values of the excursion of the ZOA were greater than and well correlated with the values of the DOD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data from this exploratory study suggest that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA on the lateral aspect of the chest using a linear probe is consistently successful on both right and left sides. Future studies are needed to establish the distribution of normal values and suggest diagnostic criteria for diaphragmatic paresis or paralysis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03225508.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"800-804"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of a novel point-of-care ultrasound method to assess diaphragmatic excursion.\",\"authors\":\"Diogo Da Conceicao, Anahi Perlas, Laura Giron Arango, Kim Wild, Qixuan Li, Ella Huszti, Jayanta Chowdhury, Vincent Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2023-104983\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound can assess diaphragmatic function and rule in or rule out paresis of the diaphragm. While this is a useful bedside tool, established methods have significant limitations. This study explores a new method to assess diaphragmatic motion by measuring the excursion of the uppermost point of the zone of apposition (ZOA) at the mid-axillary line using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe and compares it with two previously established methods: the assessment of the excursion of the dome of the diaphragm (DOD) and the thickening ratio at the ZOA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre, prospective comparative study on elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function. Following research ethics board approval and patient written consent, 75 elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function were evaluated preoperatively. Three ultrasound methods were compared: (1) assessment of the excursion of the DOD using a curvilinear probe through an abdominal window; (2) assessment of the thickening fraction of the ZOA; and (3) assessment of the excursion of the ZOA. The last two methods performed with a linear probe on the lateral aspect of the chest.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five patients were studied. We found that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA was more consistently successful (100% bilaterally) than the evaluation of the excursion of the DOD (98.7% and 34.7% on the right and left sides, respectively). The absolute values of the excursion of the ZOA were greater than and well correlated with the values of the DOD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our preliminary data from this exploratory study suggest that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA on the lateral aspect of the chest using a linear probe is consistently successful on both right and left sides. Future studies are needed to establish the distribution of normal values and suggest diagnostic criteria for diaphragmatic paresis or paralysis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03225508.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"800-804\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104983\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2023-104983","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:护理点超声可以评估膈肌功能,并排除膈肌麻痹。虽然这是一种有用的床边工具,但已有的方法有很大的局限性。本研究探索了一种评估膈肌运动的新方法,即使用高频线性超声探头测量腋中线贴附区(ZOA)最上点的偏移,并将其与先前建立的两种方法进行比较:评估膈肌圆顶(DOD)的偏移和ZOA处的增稠率膈功能正常的择期手术患者的单中心前瞻性比较研究。在研究伦理委员会批准和患者书面同意后,对75名膈肌功能正常的择期手术患者进行了术前评估。比较了三种超声方法:(1)通过腹窗使用曲线探头评估DOD偏移;(2) ZOA的增稠部分的评估;以及(3)ZOA偏移的评估。最后两种方法是在胸部侧面用线性探头进行的。结果:研究了75例患者。我们发现,对ZOA偏移的评估比对DOD偏移的评估(分别为98.7%和34.7%)更一致地成功(双侧100%)。ZOA偏移的绝对值大于DOD值,并且与DOD值有很好的相关性。结论:我们从这项探索性研究中获得的初步数据表明,使用线性探针在胸部侧面评估ZOA偏移在右侧和左侧都是一致成功的。未来的研究需要建立正常值的分布,并提出膈肌麻痹或麻痹的诊断标准。试验注册号:NCT03225508。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of a novel point-of-care ultrasound method to assess diaphragmatic excursion.

Introduction: Point-of-care ultrasound can assess diaphragmatic function and rule in or rule out paresis of the diaphragm. While this is a useful bedside tool, established methods have significant limitations. This study explores a new method to assess diaphragmatic motion by measuring the excursion of the uppermost point of the zone of apposition (ZOA) at the mid-axillary line using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe and compares it with two previously established methods: the assessment of the excursion of the dome of the diaphragm (DOD) and the thickening ratio at the ZOA.

Methods: This is a single-centre, prospective comparative study on elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function. Following research ethics board approval and patient written consent, 75 elective surgical patients with normal diaphragmatic function were evaluated preoperatively. Three ultrasound methods were compared: (1) assessment of the excursion of the DOD using a curvilinear probe through an abdominal window; (2) assessment of the thickening fraction of the ZOA; and (3) assessment of the excursion of the ZOA. The last two methods performed with a linear probe on the lateral aspect of the chest.

Results: Seventy-five patients were studied. We found that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA was more consistently successful (100% bilaterally) than the evaluation of the excursion of the DOD (98.7% and 34.7% on the right and left sides, respectively). The absolute values of the excursion of the ZOA were greater than and well correlated with the values of the DOD.

Conclusion: Our preliminary data from this exploratory study suggest that the evaluation of the excursion of the ZOA on the lateral aspect of the chest using a linear probe is consistently successful on both right and left sides. Future studies are needed to establish the distribution of normal values and suggest diagnostic criteria for diaphragmatic paresis or paralysis.

Trial registration number: NCT03225508.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信