大剂量重组人血小板生成素治疗免疫性血小板减少症的疗效和安全性。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 CELL BIOLOGY
Platelets Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-08 DOI:10.1080/09537104.2023.2271568
Xiuli Wang, Hui Bi, Lin Liu, Yuebo Liu, Liefen Yin, Jin Yao, Jingxing Yu, Wei Tao, Yueping Wei, Yu Li, Lingmei Yin, Hongli Mu, Yadong Du, Zeping Zhou
{"title":"大剂量重组人血小板生成素治疗免疫性血小板减少症的疗效和安全性。","authors":"Xiuli Wang, Hui Bi, Lin Liu, Yuebo Liu, Liefen Yin, Jin Yao, Jingxing Yu, Wei Tao, Yueping Wei, Yu Li, Lingmei Yin, Hongli Mu, Yadong Du, Zeping Zhou","doi":"10.1080/09537104.2023.2271568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The conventional dose of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is 300 U/kg per day, but the clinical reaction rate is not satisfactory. Accordingly, we explored the efficacy and safety of increasing rhTPO dose in the treatment of ITP. A retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 105 ITP patients who were divided into two groups, a low-dose group (15 000 U/day) and a high-dose group (30 000 U/day) according to the dose of rhTPO. The total effective rate of the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 31/44 (70.45%) vs. 56/61 (91.80%) (<i>P</i> = .049), and the average time of using rhTPO in the high-dose group was shorter than that in the low-dose group (7 days vs. 10 days, <i>P</i> = .001). On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the efficacy of the high-dose group was better than that of the low-dose group [45/61 (73.77%) vs. 17/44 (38.64%), <i>P</i> < .001; 55/60 (91.67%) vs. 30/44 (68.18%), <i>P</i> < .05)]. The incidence of treatment related adverse events in the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 6/44 (13.64%) vs. 6/61 (9.84%) (<i>P</i> > .05), which were mild and transient in nature. In our study, high-dose rhTPO had good efficacy and high safety in the treatment of ITP with the efficacy better than low-dose rhTPO especially at day 7.</p>","PeriodicalId":20268,"journal":{"name":"Platelets","volume":"34 1","pages":"2271568"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of high dose recombinant human thrombopoietin in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.\",\"authors\":\"Xiuli Wang, Hui Bi, Lin Liu, Yuebo Liu, Liefen Yin, Jin Yao, Jingxing Yu, Wei Tao, Yueping Wei, Yu Li, Lingmei Yin, Hongli Mu, Yadong Du, Zeping Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09537104.2023.2271568\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The conventional dose of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is 300 U/kg per day, but the clinical reaction rate is not satisfactory. Accordingly, we explored the efficacy and safety of increasing rhTPO dose in the treatment of ITP. A retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 105 ITP patients who were divided into two groups, a low-dose group (15 000 U/day) and a high-dose group (30 000 U/day) according to the dose of rhTPO. The total effective rate of the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 31/44 (70.45%) vs. 56/61 (91.80%) (<i>P</i> = .049), and the average time of using rhTPO in the high-dose group was shorter than that in the low-dose group (7 days vs. 10 days, <i>P</i> = .001). On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the efficacy of the high-dose group was better than that of the low-dose group [45/61 (73.77%) vs. 17/44 (38.64%), <i>P</i> < .001; 55/60 (91.67%) vs. 30/44 (68.18%), <i>P</i> < .05)]. The incidence of treatment related adverse events in the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 6/44 (13.64%) vs. 6/61 (9.84%) (<i>P</i> > .05), which were mild and transient in nature. In our study, high-dose rhTPO had good efficacy and high safety in the treatment of ITP with the efficacy better than low-dose rhTPO especially at day 7.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Platelets\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"2271568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Platelets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2023.2271568\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CELL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platelets","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09537104.2023.2271568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重组人血小板生成素(rhTPO)治疗免疫性血小板减少症(ITP)的常规剂量为300 U/kg/天,但临床反应率不理想。因此,我们探讨了增加rhTPO剂量治疗ITP的有效性和安全性。进行了一项回顾性研究,收集了105名ITP患者的临床数据,他们被分为两组,一组是低剂量组(15000 U/天)和高剂量组(30000 U/天)。低剂量组和高剂量组的总有效率分别为31/44(70.45%)和56/61(91.80%)(P = .049),高剂量组使用rhTPO的平均时间短于低剂量组(7 天与10天 天,P = .001)。在治疗的第7天和第14天,高剂量组的疗效优于低剂量组[45/61(73.77%)vs.17/44(38.64%),P P P > .05),性质温和且短暂。在我们的研究中,高剂量rhTPO治疗ITP具有良好的疗效和高安全性,疗效优于低剂量rhTPO,尤其是在第7天。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and safety of high dose recombinant human thrombopoietin in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia.

The conventional dose of recombinant human thrombopoietin (rhTPO) in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is 300 U/kg per day, but the clinical reaction rate is not satisfactory. Accordingly, we explored the efficacy and safety of increasing rhTPO dose in the treatment of ITP. A retrospective study was conducted to collect the clinical data of 105 ITP patients who were divided into two groups, a low-dose group (15 000 U/day) and a high-dose group (30 000 U/day) according to the dose of rhTPO. The total effective rate of the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 31/44 (70.45%) vs. 56/61 (91.80%) (P = .049), and the average time of using rhTPO in the high-dose group was shorter than that in the low-dose group (7 days vs. 10 days, P = .001). On the 7th and 14th day of treatment, the efficacy of the high-dose group was better than that of the low-dose group [45/61 (73.77%) vs. 17/44 (38.64%), P < .001; 55/60 (91.67%) vs. 30/44 (68.18%), P < .05)]. The incidence of treatment related adverse events in the low-dose group and the high-dose group was 6/44 (13.64%) vs. 6/61 (9.84%) (P > .05), which were mild and transient in nature. In our study, high-dose rhTPO had good efficacy and high safety in the treatment of ITP with the efficacy better than low-dose rhTPO especially at day 7.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Platelets
Platelets 医学-细胞生物学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Platelets is an international, peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of platelet- and megakaryocyte-related research. Platelets provides the opportunity for contributors and readers across scientific disciplines to engage with new information about blood platelets. The journal’s Methods section aims to improve standardization between laboratories and to help researchers replicate difficult methods. Research areas include: Platelet function Biochemistry Signal transduction Pharmacology and therapeutics Interaction with other cells in the blood vessel wall The contribution of platelets and platelet-derived products to health and disease The journal publishes original articles, fast-track articles, review articles, systematic reviews, methods papers, short communications, case reports, opinion articles, commentaries, gene of the issue, and letters to the editor. Platelets operates a single-blind peer review policy. Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信