ChatGPT在神经病学笔试问题上的表现评估。

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
BMJ Neurology Open Pub Date : 2023-11-02 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjno-2023-000530
Tse Chian Chen, Evan Multala, Patrick Kearns, Johnny Delashaw, Aaron Dumont, Demetrius Maraganore, Arthur Wang
{"title":"ChatGPT在神经病学笔试问题上的表现评估。","authors":"Tse Chian Chen, Evan Multala, Patrick Kearns, Johnny Delashaw, Aaron Dumont, Demetrius Maraganore, Arthur Wang","doi":"10.1136/bmjno-2023-000530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ChatGPT has shown promise in healthcare. To assess the utility of this novel tool in healthcare education, we evaluated ChatGPT's performance in answering neurology board exam questions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurology board-style examination questions were accessed from BoardVitals, a commercial neurology question bank. ChatGPT was provided a full question prompt and multiple answer choices. First attempts and additional attempts up to three tries were given to ChatGPT to select the correct answer. A total of 560 questions (14 blocks of 40 questions) were used, although any image-based questions were disregarded due to ChatGPT's inability to process visual input. The artificial intelligence (AI) answers were then compared with human user data provided by the question bank to gauge its performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 509 eligible questions over 14 question blocks, ChatGPT correctly answered 335 questions (65.8%) on the first attempt/iteration and 383 (75.3%) over three attempts/iterations, scoring at approximately the 26th and 50th percentiles, respectively. The highest performing subjects were pain (100%), epilepsy & seizures (85%) and genetic (82%) while the lowest performing subjects were imaging/diagnostic studies (27%), critical care (41%) and cranial nerves (48%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study found that ChatGPT performed similarly to its human counterparts. The accuracy of the AI increased with multiple attempts and performance fell within the expected range of neurology resident learners. This study demonstrates ChatGPT's potential in processing specialised medical information. Future studies would better define the scope to which AI would be able to integrate into medical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":52754,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Neurology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of ChatGPT's performance on neurology written board examination questions.\",\"authors\":\"Tse Chian Chen, Evan Multala, Patrick Kearns, Johnny Delashaw, Aaron Dumont, Demetrius Maraganore, Arthur Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjno-2023-000530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>ChatGPT has shown promise in healthcare. To assess the utility of this novel tool in healthcare education, we evaluated ChatGPT's performance in answering neurology board exam questions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Neurology board-style examination questions were accessed from BoardVitals, a commercial neurology question bank. ChatGPT was provided a full question prompt and multiple answer choices. First attempts and additional attempts up to three tries were given to ChatGPT to select the correct answer. A total of 560 questions (14 blocks of 40 questions) were used, although any image-based questions were disregarded due to ChatGPT's inability to process visual input. The artificial intelligence (AI) answers were then compared with human user data provided by the question bank to gauge its performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 509 eligible questions over 14 question blocks, ChatGPT correctly answered 335 questions (65.8%) on the first attempt/iteration and 383 (75.3%) over three attempts/iterations, scoring at approximately the 26th and 50th percentiles, respectively. The highest performing subjects were pain (100%), epilepsy & seizures (85%) and genetic (82%) while the lowest performing subjects were imaging/diagnostic studies (27%), critical care (41%) and cranial nerves (48%).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study found that ChatGPT performed similarly to its human counterparts. The accuracy of the AI increased with multiple attempts and performance fell within the expected range of neurology resident learners. This study demonstrates ChatGPT's potential in processing specialised medical information. Future studies would better define the scope to which AI would be able to integrate into medical decision making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10626870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Neurology Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2023-000530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Neurology Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjno-2023-000530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:ChatGPT在医疗保健领域显示出了前景。为了评估这种新工具在医疗保健教育中的效用,我们评估了ChatGPT在回答神经病学委员会考试问题方面的表现。方法:从商业神经病学题库BoardVitals中获取神经病学委员会式考试题。ChatGPT提供了完整的问题提示和多种答案选择。ChatGPT进行了第一次尝试和最多三次的额外尝试,以选择正确的答案。共使用了560个问题(14个问题块,共40个问题),但由于ChatGPT无法处理视觉输入,任何基于图像的问题都被忽略了。然后将人工智能(AI)的答案与题库提供的人类用户数据进行比较,以评估其性能。结果:在14个问题块的509个合格问题中,ChatGPT在第一次尝试/迭代中正确回答了335个问题(65.8%),在三次尝试/反复中正确回答383个问题(75.3%),得分分别约为26%和50%。表现最高的受试者是疼痛(100%)、癫痫和癫痫发作(85%)和遗传(82%),而表现最低的受试对象是成像/诊断研究(27%)、重症监护(41%)和脑神经(48%)。讨论:这项研究发现,ChatGPT的表现与人类类似。人工智能的准确性随着多次尝试而提高,表现在神经病学住院学习者的预期范围内。这项研究证明了ChatGPT在处理专业医疗信息方面的潜力。未来的研究将更好地确定人工智能能够融入医疗决策的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessment of ChatGPT's performance on neurology written board examination questions.

Assessment of ChatGPT's performance on neurology written board examination questions.

Background and objectives: ChatGPT has shown promise in healthcare. To assess the utility of this novel tool in healthcare education, we evaluated ChatGPT's performance in answering neurology board exam questions.

Methods: Neurology board-style examination questions were accessed from BoardVitals, a commercial neurology question bank. ChatGPT was provided a full question prompt and multiple answer choices. First attempts and additional attempts up to three tries were given to ChatGPT to select the correct answer. A total of 560 questions (14 blocks of 40 questions) were used, although any image-based questions were disregarded due to ChatGPT's inability to process visual input. The artificial intelligence (AI) answers were then compared with human user data provided by the question bank to gauge its performance.

Results: Out of 509 eligible questions over 14 question blocks, ChatGPT correctly answered 335 questions (65.8%) on the first attempt/iteration and 383 (75.3%) over three attempts/iterations, scoring at approximately the 26th and 50th percentiles, respectively. The highest performing subjects were pain (100%), epilepsy & seizures (85%) and genetic (82%) while the lowest performing subjects were imaging/diagnostic studies (27%), critical care (41%) and cranial nerves (48%).

Discussion: This study found that ChatGPT performed similarly to its human counterparts. The accuracy of the AI increased with multiple attempts and performance fell within the expected range of neurology resident learners. This study demonstrates ChatGPT's potential in processing specialised medical information. Future studies would better define the scope to which AI would be able to integrate into medical decision making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Neurology Open
BMJ Neurology Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
46
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信