同性恋作为一个公共卫生问题:范围界定综述。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Revista de saude publica Pub Date : 2023-11-03 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447
Romeu Gomes, Tereza Setsuko Toma, Jessica De Lucca Da Silva, Fernando Meirinho Domene, Adriano da Silva
{"title":"同性恋作为一个公共卫生问题:范围界定综述。","authors":"Romeu Gomes, Tereza Setsuko Toma, Jessica De Lucca Da Silva, Fernando Meirinho Domene, Adriano da Silva","doi":"10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map global scientific production on homoparenting in the field of collective health or public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In terms of methodological procedures, a scoping review was carried out, guided by the following question: What are the aspects addressed in global scientific production regarding homoparental families in the field of collective or public health? The searches were carried out in seven sources of scientific literature, including 58 studies, involving scientific articles and dissertations. The analytical treatment given to the studies, most of which were qualitative, followed the content analysis technique in the thematic modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that the perceptions of homosexuals and professionals about the care provided and health services in general was the topic addressed by the largest number of studies (n = 31), followed by heteronormative context of health services (n = 26); disclosure of sexual orientation (n = 20); fertilization (n = 14); educational information and actions (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the issue of same-sex parenthood has been discussed in some health sectors, there is awareness that it is necessary to rely on a consolidated basis through numerous studies when discussing this issue. It is concluded that, among other aspects, the scope of this review is not sufficiently problematized within the scope of health professionals' training and performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":21230,"journal":{"name":"Revista de saude publica","volume":"57 ","pages":"80"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609659/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Homoparenting as a public health issue: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Romeu Gomes, Tereza Setsuko Toma, Jessica De Lucca Da Silva, Fernando Meirinho Domene, Adriano da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map global scientific production on homoparenting in the field of collective health or public health.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In terms of methodological procedures, a scoping review was carried out, guided by the following question: What are the aspects addressed in global scientific production regarding homoparental families in the field of collective or public health? The searches were carried out in seven sources of scientific literature, including 58 studies, involving scientific articles and dissertations. The analytical treatment given to the studies, most of which were qualitative, followed the content analysis technique in the thematic modality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate that the perceptions of homosexuals and professionals about the care provided and health services in general was the topic addressed by the largest number of studies (n = 31), followed by heteronormative context of health services (n = 26); disclosure of sexual orientation (n = 20); fertilization (n = 14); educational information and actions (n = 5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the issue of same-sex parenthood has been discussed in some health sectors, there is awareness that it is necessary to rely on a consolidated basis through numerous studies when discussing this issue. It is concluded that, among other aspects, the scope of this review is not sufficiently problematized within the scope of health professionals' training and performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21230,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10609659/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de saude publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de saude publica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057005447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:绘制集体卫生或公共卫生领域关于同父同母的全球科学成果图。方法:在方法论程序方面,在以下问题的指导下进行了范围界定审查:在集体或公共卫生领域,全球科学生产中涉及的关于同父母家庭的哪些方面?检索了7个科学文献来源,包括58项涉及科学文章和学位论文的研究。对这些研究的分析处理大多是定性的,遵循了主题模态中的内容分析技术。结果:研究结果表明,同性恋者和专业人员对所提供的护理和医疗服务的总体看法是研究数量最多的主题(n=31),其次是医疗服务的非规范背景(n=26);披露性取向(n=20);受精(n=14);教育信息和行动(n=5)。结论:尽管一些卫生部门已经讨论了同性父母身份的问题,但人们意识到,在讨论这一问题时,有必要通过大量研究来巩固这一基础。结论是,除其他方面外,在卫生专业人员的培训和表现范围内,这项审查的范围没有充分解决问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Homoparenting as a public health issue: a scoping review.

Objective: To map global scientific production on homoparenting in the field of collective health or public health.

Methods: In terms of methodological procedures, a scoping review was carried out, guided by the following question: What are the aspects addressed in global scientific production regarding homoparental families in the field of collective or public health? The searches were carried out in seven sources of scientific literature, including 58 studies, involving scientific articles and dissertations. The analytical treatment given to the studies, most of which were qualitative, followed the content analysis technique in the thematic modality.

Results: The results indicate that the perceptions of homosexuals and professionals about the care provided and health services in general was the topic addressed by the largest number of studies (n = 31), followed by heteronormative context of health services (n = 26); disclosure of sexual orientation (n = 20); fertilization (n = 14); educational information and actions (n = 5).

Conclusion: Although the issue of same-sex parenthood has been discussed in some health sectors, there is awareness that it is necessary to rely on a consolidated basis through numerous studies when discussing this issue. It is concluded that, among other aspects, the scope of this review is not sufficiently problematized within the scope of health professionals' training and performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de saude publica
Revista de saude publica PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
93
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Saúde Pública has the purpose of publishing original scientific contributions on topics of relevance to public health in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信