无牙上下颌固定全弓康复的All-on-four概念:一项针对日本患者的纵向研究,随访3-17年,并分析生存率的危险因素。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Takashi Uesugi, Yoshiaki Shimoo, Motohiro Munakata, Daisuke Sato, Kikue Yamaguchi, Michiya Fujimaki, Kazuhisa Nakayama, Tae Watanabe, Paulo Malo
{"title":"无牙上下颌固定全弓康复的All-on-four概念:一项针对日本患者的纵向研究,随访3-17年,并分析生存率的危险因素。","authors":"Takashi Uesugi, Yoshiaki Shimoo, Motohiro Munakata, Daisuke Sato, Kikue Yamaguchi, Michiya Fujimaki, Kazuhisa Nakayama, Tae Watanabe, Paulo Malo","doi":"10.1186/s40729-023-00511-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch rehabilitation via All-on-four treatment yields good long-term results for both the maxilla and the mandible. However, the risk factors affecting long-term implant survival are unknown, and the long-term prognosis of All-on-four concept procedures in Japanese individuals has not been elucidated. We aimed to determine the cumulative implant survival rate after 3-17-year follow-up and identify the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 561 cases (307 maxillae, 254 mandibles) with 2364 implants (1324 maxillae, 1040 mandibles) that received All-on-four treatment. We investigated the cumulative implant- and patient-level survival rates and various risk factors for implant failure. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test for differences in Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate analysis using the Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis for risk factors affecting the survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative survival rate was 94.4% by patient level and 97.4% by implant level for the maxilla, and 96.7% by patient level and 98.9% by implant for the mandible, with up to 17 years of follow-up. The maxillary survival rate at the implant level was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the maxillary survival rate within 24 months was significantly lower at the implant level (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the maxilla was the most significant risk factor (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All-on-four treatment yielded high long-term survival rates in Japanese patients. However, the maxilla showed a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than the mandible, while early failure was significantly higher. Furthermore, the maxilla was a significant risk factor influencing the survival rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"9 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The All-on-four concept for fixed full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible: a longitudinal study in Japanese patients with 3-17-year follow-up and analysis of risk factors for survival rate.\",\"authors\":\"Takashi Uesugi, Yoshiaki Shimoo, Motohiro Munakata, Daisuke Sato, Kikue Yamaguchi, Michiya Fujimaki, Kazuhisa Nakayama, Tae Watanabe, Paulo Malo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40729-023-00511-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch rehabilitation via All-on-four treatment yields good long-term results for both the maxilla and the mandible. However, the risk factors affecting long-term implant survival are unknown, and the long-term prognosis of All-on-four concept procedures in Japanese individuals has not been elucidated. We aimed to determine the cumulative implant survival rate after 3-17-year follow-up and identify the associated risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 561 cases (307 maxillae, 254 mandibles) with 2364 implants (1324 maxillae, 1040 mandibles) that received All-on-four treatment. We investigated the cumulative implant- and patient-level survival rates and various risk factors for implant failure. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test for differences in Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate analysis using the Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis for risk factors affecting the survival rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cumulative survival rate was 94.4% by patient level and 97.4% by implant level for the maxilla, and 96.7% by patient level and 98.9% by implant for the mandible, with up to 17 years of follow-up. The maxillary survival rate at the implant level was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the maxillary survival rate within 24 months was significantly lower at the implant level (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the maxilla was the most significant risk factor (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>All-on-four treatment yielded high long-term survival rates in Japanese patients. However, the maxilla showed a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than the mandible, while early failure was significantly higher. Furthermore, the maxilla was a significant risk factor influencing the survival rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10632321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00511-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-023-00511-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过All-on-four治疗,植入物支持的即时负载固定全弓康复对上颌骨和下颌骨都产生了良好的长期效果。然而,影响植入物长期存活的风险因素尚不清楚,日本个体的All-on-4-concept手术的长期预后也尚未阐明。我们旨在确定3-17年随访后的累积植入物存活率,并确定相关的风险因素。方法:我们分析了561例(307个上颌骨,254个下颌骨)和2364个种植体(1324个上颌骨和1040个下颌骨),这些种植体接受了All-on-4治疗。我们研究了植入物和患者水平的累积生存率以及植入物失败的各种风险因素。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线差异的对数秩检验进行统计分析,使用卡方检验进行单变量分析,并对影响生存率的风险因素进行多变量分析。结果:上颌骨患者水平和种植体水平的累计生存率分别为94.4%和97.4%,下颌骨患者水平和植入物水平的累计存活率分别为96.7%和98.9%,随访时间长达17年。种植体水平上颌骨的存活率显著降低(p 结论:在日本患者中,四种治疗方案的长期生存率都很高。然而,上颌骨的累积生存率明显低于下颌骨,而早期失败率明显较高。此外,上颌骨是影响生存率的重要危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The All-on-four concept for fixed full-arch rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla and mandible: a longitudinal study in Japanese patients with 3-17-year follow-up and analysis of risk factors for survival rate.

Purpose: Implant-supported immediately loaded fixed full-arch rehabilitation via All-on-four treatment yields good long-term results for both the maxilla and the mandible. However, the risk factors affecting long-term implant survival are unknown, and the long-term prognosis of All-on-four concept procedures in Japanese individuals has not been elucidated. We aimed to determine the cumulative implant survival rate after 3-17-year follow-up and identify the associated risk factors.

Methods: We analysed 561 cases (307 maxillae, 254 mandibles) with 2364 implants (1324 maxillae, 1040 mandibles) that received All-on-four treatment. We investigated the cumulative implant- and patient-level survival rates and various risk factors for implant failure. Statistical analysis was performed using the log-rank test for differences in Kaplan-Meier curves, univariate analysis using the Chi-square test, and multivariate analysis for risk factors affecting the survival rate.

Results: The cumulative survival rate was 94.4% by patient level and 97.4% by implant level for the maxilla, and 96.7% by patient level and 98.9% by implant for the mandible, with up to 17 years of follow-up. The maxillary survival rate at the implant level was significantly lower (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the maxillary survival rate within 24 months was significantly lower at the implant level (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that the maxilla was the most significant risk factor (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: All-on-four treatment yielded high long-term survival rates in Japanese patients. However, the maxilla showed a significantly lower cumulative survival rate than the mandible, while early failure was significantly higher. Furthermore, the maxilla was a significant risk factor influencing the survival rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信