儿童年龄组心房间隔缺损术后超快速和快速拔管的比较。

Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1080/00015458.2023.2281097
Salih Özçobanoğlu, Emel Gündüz, Nazan Ülgen Tekerek
{"title":"儿童年龄组心房间隔缺损术后超快速和快速拔管的比较。","authors":"Salih Özçobanoğlu, Emel Gündüz, Nazan Ülgen Tekerek","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2023.2281097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Bacground: </strong>Patients who underwent ultrafast track on the operating table and fast track extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit for 2 to 6 h after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in the pediatric age group were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2013 and February 2017, 60 pediatric patients (24 boys, 36 girls; Mean age 7.5 ± 4.6 years) whose secundum atrial defect was closed were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were separated as those who were extubated on the operating table (Group1,<i>n</i> = 28) and those extubated in the pediatric intensive care unit within 2-6 h postoperatively (Group2,<i>n</i> = 32).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference was found in demographic data and preoperative catheter information between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 20(18-25)/27.5(20-30)minutes (p:0.001), the cross-clamp time was 10(10-15)/15(11-20)minutes(p:0.004), the postoperative drainage amount was 50(25-50)/60(32.5-100)ml(p:0.013), the length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1(1--1)/1(1-2)day(p:0.025), the length of stay after intensive care was 3(2-3)/3(3-4)days(p:0.001) and the total hospital stay was 4(3-4)/5(4-5.5) days (<i>p</i> < 0.001), which were respectively shorter for the group 1 compared to 2. Postoperative blood product replacement, positive inotrope support, pericardial effusion, mortality, and morbidity were not detected in either groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, it was observed that the UFT extubation was safe for the patients who were operated for secundum ASD, in the pediatric age group, and had a cross-clamp time not exceeding 15 min. It was found that the amount of drainage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, post-intensive care unit, and the total hospital stay of patients extubated on the operating table were shorter.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of ultrafast and fast track extubation after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in pediatric age group.\",\"authors\":\"Salih Özçobanoğlu, Emel Gündüz, Nazan Ülgen Tekerek\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00015458.2023.2281097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Bacground: </strong>Patients who underwent ultrafast track on the operating table and fast track extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit for 2 to 6 h after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in the pediatric age group were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2013 and February 2017, 60 pediatric patients (24 boys, 36 girls; Mean age 7.5 ± 4.6 years) whose secundum atrial defect was closed were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were separated as those who were extubated on the operating table (Group1,<i>n</i> = 28) and those extubated in the pediatric intensive care unit within 2-6 h postoperatively (Group2,<i>n</i> = 32).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference was found in demographic data and preoperative catheter information between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 20(18-25)/27.5(20-30)minutes (p:0.001), the cross-clamp time was 10(10-15)/15(11-20)minutes(p:0.004), the postoperative drainage amount was 50(25-50)/60(32.5-100)ml(p:0.013), the length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1(1--1)/1(1-2)day(p:0.025), the length of stay after intensive care was 3(2-3)/3(3-4)days(p:0.001) and the total hospital stay was 4(3-4)/5(4-5.5) days (<i>p</i> < 0.001), which were respectively shorter for the group 1 compared to 2. Postoperative blood product replacement, positive inotrope support, pericardial effusion, mortality, and morbidity were not detected in either groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, it was observed that the UFT extubation was safe for the patients who were operated for secundum ASD, in the pediatric age group, and had a cross-clamp time not exceeding 15 min. It was found that the amount of drainage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, post-intensive care unit, and the total hospital stay of patients extubated on the operating table were shorter.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2023.2281097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/11/16 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2023.2281097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Bacground:在手术台上接受超快速通道和在儿科重症监护室快速通道拔管2至6天的患者 对儿童年龄组的继发性房间隔缺损手术后数小时进行比较。方法:2013年1月至2017年2月,60名儿科患者(24名男孩,36名女孩;平均年龄7.5岁) ± 4.6年)的患者进行回顾性分析。将患者分为在手术台上拔管的患者(组1 = 28)和2-6岁以内在儿科重症监护室拔管的患者 术后小时(第2组 = 结果:两组患者的人口学数据和术前导管信息无差异。心肺转流时间为20(18-25)/27.5(20-30)分钟(p:0.001),交叉夹持时间为10(10-15)/15(11-20)分钟(p:0.004),术后引流量为50(25-50)/60(32.5-100)ml(p:0.013),在重症监护室的停留时间为1(1-1)/1(1-2)天(p:0.025),重症监护后住院时间为3(2-3)/3(3-4)天(p=0.001),总住院时间为4(3-4)/5(4-5.5)天(p 结论:在本研究中,观察到UFT拔管对于儿童年龄组的继发性ASD手术患者是安全的,并且交叉夹持时间不超过15 分钟研究发现,在手术台上拔管的患者的引流量、在重症监护室的住院时间、重症监护室后的住院时间和总住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Comparison of ultrafast and fast track extubation after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in pediatric age group.

Bacground: Patients who underwent ultrafast track on the operating table and fast track extubation in the pediatric intensive care unit for 2 to 6 h after secundum atrial septal defect surgery in the pediatric age group were compared.

Methods: Between January 2013 and February 2017, 60 pediatric patients (24 boys, 36 girls; Mean age 7.5 ± 4.6 years) whose secundum atrial defect was closed were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were separated as those who were extubated on the operating table (Group1,n = 28) and those extubated in the pediatric intensive care unit within 2-6 h postoperatively (Group2,n = 32).

Results: No difference was found in demographic data and preoperative catheter information between the groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time was 20(18-25)/27.5(20-30)minutes (p:0.001), the cross-clamp time was 10(10-15)/15(11-20)minutes(p:0.004), the postoperative drainage amount was 50(25-50)/60(32.5-100)ml(p:0.013), the length of stay in the intensive care unit was 1(1--1)/1(1-2)day(p:0.025), the length of stay after intensive care was 3(2-3)/3(3-4)days(p:0.001) and the total hospital stay was 4(3-4)/5(4-5.5) days (p < 0.001), which were respectively shorter for the group 1 compared to 2. Postoperative blood product replacement, positive inotrope support, pericardial effusion, mortality, and morbidity were not detected in either groups.

Conclusion: In this study, it was observed that the UFT extubation was safe for the patients who were operated for secundum ASD, in the pediatric age group, and had a cross-clamp time not exceeding 15 min. It was found that the amount of drainage, length of stay in the intensive care unit, post-intensive care unit, and the total hospital stay of patients extubated on the operating table were shorter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信