内容、背景和协作:DNP实践奖学金结构化成功的可操作策略。

IF 0.2 Q4 NURSING
Constance L Wall-Haas
{"title":"内容、背景和协作:DNP实践奖学金结构化成功的可操作策略。","authors":"Constance L Wall-Haas","doi":"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Even if everything is done right in justifying the clinical benefit of a healthcare initiative, it cannot be sustainable if, first and foremost, the temperament of the practice environment, including the wider institutional hierarchy, is not accurately gauged. The purpose of this article is to provide the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) researcher with a systematic structure enabling a review of the larger context of the proposed clinical innovation. This review supports a DNP-led healthcare initiative through self-analysis of the researcher's role; forging a relationship with a mentor; the analysis and mitigation of institutional, collaborative, and organizational barriers; and negotiating strategic partnerships with colleagues and departments and sharing their work and expertise. The blueprint that can change the interface of these elements is the creation of a specific research advisory committee (RADCOMM). The RADCOMM can be the impetus for transforming the institution into a place for learning, personal and professional growth and development, and patient safety, as well as one that results in new common resources and improved practice scholarship. The next generation of scholars and their capacity to understand their position in healthcare is inherently inhibited by not integrating the role and value of practice scholarship. The success of a DNP-led healthcare initiative, however, can positively affect the researcher's mental health, productivity, and career satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":40310,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Content, Context, and Collaboration: An Actionable Strategy for Structured Success in DNP Practice Scholarship.\",\"authors\":\"Constance L Wall-Haas\",\"doi\":\"10.1891/JDNP-2023-0016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Even if everything is done right in justifying the clinical benefit of a healthcare initiative, it cannot be sustainable if, first and foremost, the temperament of the practice environment, including the wider institutional hierarchy, is not accurately gauged. The purpose of this article is to provide the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) researcher with a systematic structure enabling a review of the larger context of the proposed clinical innovation. This review supports a DNP-led healthcare initiative through self-analysis of the researcher's role; forging a relationship with a mentor; the analysis and mitigation of institutional, collaborative, and organizational barriers; and negotiating strategic partnerships with colleagues and departments and sharing their work and expertise. The blueprint that can change the interface of these elements is the creation of a specific research advisory committee (RADCOMM). The RADCOMM can be the impetus for transforming the institution into a place for learning, personal and professional growth and development, and patient safety, as well as one that results in new common resources and improved practice scholarship. The next generation of scholars and their capacity to understand their position in healthcare is inherently inhibited by not integrating the role and value of practice scholarship. The success of a DNP-led healthcare initiative, however, can positively affect the researcher's mental health, productivity, and career satisfaction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":40310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0016\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Doctoral Nursing Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JDNP-2023-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即使在证明医疗保健倡议的临床益处方面做得很好,但如果首先不能准确衡量实践环境的气质,包括更广泛的机构等级制度,那么它也不可能是可持续的。本文的目的是为护理实践博士(DNP)研究人员提供一个系统结构,使其能够对拟议的临床创新的更大背景进行审查。这篇综述通过对研究人员角色的自我分析,支持DNP领导的医疗保健倡议;与导师建立关系;分析和缓解体制、合作和组织障碍;与同事和部门协商战略伙伴关系,并分享他们的工作和专业知识。可以改变这些元素界面的蓝图是建立一个特定的研究咨询委员会(RADCOMM)。RADCOMM可以推动该机构转变为一个学习、个人和专业成长和发展以及患者安全的地方,并带来新的共同资源和改进的实践奖学金。下一代学者及其理解自己在医疗保健领域地位的能力因没有整合实践学术的作用和价值而受到固有的抑制。然而,DNP领导的医疗保健计划的成功可以积极影响研究人员的心理健康、生产力和职业满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Content, Context, and Collaboration: An Actionable Strategy for Structured Success in DNP Practice Scholarship.

Even if everything is done right in justifying the clinical benefit of a healthcare initiative, it cannot be sustainable if, first and foremost, the temperament of the practice environment, including the wider institutional hierarchy, is not accurately gauged. The purpose of this article is to provide the Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) researcher with a systematic structure enabling a review of the larger context of the proposed clinical innovation. This review supports a DNP-led healthcare initiative through self-analysis of the researcher's role; forging a relationship with a mentor; the analysis and mitigation of institutional, collaborative, and organizational barriers; and negotiating strategic partnerships with colleagues and departments and sharing their work and expertise. The blueprint that can change the interface of these elements is the creation of a specific research advisory committee (RADCOMM). The RADCOMM can be the impetus for transforming the institution into a place for learning, personal and professional growth and development, and patient safety, as well as one that results in new common resources and improved practice scholarship. The next generation of scholars and their capacity to understand their position in healthcare is inherently inhibited by not integrating the role and value of practice scholarship. The success of a DNP-led healthcare initiative, however, can positively affect the researcher's mental health, productivity, and career satisfaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信