神经伦理学指导文件:原则、分析和实施策略。

IF 2.5 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2023-10-26 eCollection Date: 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsad025
Matthew R O'Shaughnessy, Walter G Johnson, Lucille Nalbach Tournas, Christopher J Rozell, Karen S Rommelfanger
{"title":"神经伦理学指导文件:原则、分析和实施策略。","authors":"Matthew R O'Shaughnessy, Walter G Johnson, Lucille Nalbach Tournas, Christopher J Rozell, Karen S Rommelfanger","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsad025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"10 2","pages":"lsad025"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew R O'Shaughnessy, Walter G Johnson, Lucille Nalbach Tournas, Christopher J Rozell, Karen S Rommelfanger\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jlb/lsad025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"lsad025\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10602660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Law and the Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsad025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

神经技术的创新引发了世界各地关于伦理的讨论,对研究人员、政策制定者和私营部门都有影响。神经技术对人权的影响引起了联合国各机构的注意;近40个州的任务是执行经济合作与发展组织关于负责任的神经技术创新的原则;美国正在考虑对脑机接口实施出口管制。在此背景下,我们首次回顾和分析了著名政府、私人和学术团体最近发布的神经伦理学指导文件,重点关注明确目标的共性和差异;设想不同利益攸关方群体的作用和责任;以及建议公众发挥的作用。借鉴其他新兴技术治理的经验教训,我们提出了实施和评估战略,以指导从业者和决策者在研究、商业和政策环境中实施这些道德规范。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuroethics guidance documents: principles, analysis, and implementation strategies.

Innovations in neurotechnologies have ignited conversations about ethics around the world, with implications for researchers, policymakers, and the private sector. The human rights impacts of neurotechnologies have drawn the attention of United Nations bodies; nearly 40 states are tasked with implementing the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development's principles for responsible innovation in neurotechnology; and the United States is considering placing export controls on brain-computer interfaces. Against this backdrop, we offer the first review and analysis of neuroethics guidance documents recently issued by prominent government, private, and academic groups, focusing on commonalities and divergences in articulated goals; envisioned roles and responsibilities of different stakeholder groups; and the suggested role of the public. Drawing on lessons from the governance of other emerging technologies, we suggest implementation and evaluation strategies to guide practitioners and policymakers in operationalizing these ethical norms in research, business, and policy settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信