对波茨坦的失望

J. Bhagwati
{"title":"对波茨坦的失望","authors":"J. Bhagwati","doi":"10.7916/D8DB8BPB","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIR – Your leader on the Doha round did the negotiations a disservice by joining Susan Schwab, America's trade representative, in her disingenuous attack on India (and Brazil, to a lesser degree) as the cause of the failure of the summit in Potsdam between the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India (―Potsdam's price‖, June 30th). The breakdown at Potsdam was America's fault, not India's. Ms Schwab offered to lower the ceiling on America's distorting agricultural subsidies to $17 billion. As America currently spends only about $11 billion, a ceiling of $17 billion would actually allow it to raise its subsidy level in the future.","PeriodicalId":81145,"journal":{"name":"Economist (London, England : 1843)","volume":"384 1","pages":"18-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disappointment at Potsdam\",\"authors\":\"J. Bhagwati\",\"doi\":\"10.7916/D8DB8BPB\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SIR – Your leader on the Doha round did the negotiations a disservice by joining Susan Schwab, America's trade representative, in her disingenuous attack on India (and Brazil, to a lesser degree) as the cause of the failure of the summit in Potsdam between the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India (―Potsdam's price‖, June 30th). The breakdown at Potsdam was America's fault, not India's. Ms Schwab offered to lower the ceiling on America's distorting agricultural subsidies to $17 billion. As America currently spends only about $11 billion, a ceiling of $17 billion would actually allow it to raise its subsidy level in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economist (London, England : 1843)\",\"volume\":\"384 1\",\"pages\":\"18-18\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economist (London, England : 1843)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8DB8BPB\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economist (London, England : 1843)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/D8DB8BPB","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先生——你们在多哈回合谈判中的领导人与美国贸易代表苏珊•施瓦布一道,虚伪地指责印度(以及巴西,在较小程度上)是美国、欧盟、巴西和印度在波茨坦举行的峰会失败的原因(—波茨坦价格‖,6月30日),这对多哈回合谈判造成了伤害。波茨坦的崩溃是美国的错,不是印度的错。施瓦布提议将美国扭曲的农业补贴上限降至170亿美元。由于美国目前只花了110亿美元,170亿美元的上限实际上可以让它在未来提高补贴水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Disappointment at Potsdam
SIR – Your leader on the Doha round did the negotiations a disservice by joining Susan Schwab, America's trade representative, in her disingenuous attack on India (and Brazil, to a lesser degree) as the cause of the failure of the summit in Potsdam between the United States, the European Union, Brazil and India (―Potsdam's price‖, June 30th). The breakdown at Potsdam was America's fault, not India's. Ms Schwab offered to lower the ceiling on America's distorting agricultural subsidies to $17 billion. As America currently spends only about $11 billion, a ceiling of $17 billion would actually allow it to raise its subsidy level in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信