G. Ivanova, El�bieta Wagner-Bojakowska, W�adys�aw Wilczy�ski
{"title":"低密度算子。?_{f}对?_{d}","authors":"G. Ivanova, El�bieta Wagner-Bojakowska, W�adys�aw Wilczy�ski","doi":"10.7494/opmath.2023.43.2.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the new method of the construction of lower density operator introduced in the earlier paper of the first two authors, we study how much the new operator can be different from the classical one. The aim of this paper is to show that if \\(f\\) is a good adjusted measure-preserving bijection then the lower density operator generated by \\(f\\) can be really different from the classical density operator.","PeriodicalId":45563,"journal":{"name":"Opuscula Mathematica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lower density operators. ?_{f} versus ?_{d}\",\"authors\":\"G. Ivanova, El�bieta Wagner-Bojakowska, W�adys�aw Wilczy�ski\",\"doi\":\"10.7494/opmath.2023.43.2.185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the new method of the construction of lower density operator introduced in the earlier paper of the first two authors, we study how much the new operator can be different from the classical one. The aim of this paper is to show that if \\\\(f\\\\) is a good adjusted measure-preserving bijection then the lower density operator generated by \\\\(f\\\\) can be really different from the classical density operator.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Opuscula Mathematica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Opuscula Mathematica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2023.43.2.185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Opuscula Mathematica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7494/opmath.2023.43.2.185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Using the new method of the construction of lower density operator introduced in the earlier paper of the first two authors, we study how much the new operator can be different from the classical one. The aim of this paper is to show that if \(f\) is a good adjusted measure-preserving bijection then the lower density operator generated by \(f\) can be really different from the classical density operator.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
