打破玻璃天花板:以博士论文答辩为关键转折点

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
Nazareth Gallego Morón
{"title":"打破玻璃天花板:以博士论文答辩为关键转折点","authors":"Nazareth Gallego Morón","doi":"10.7203/METODE.7.8077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statistics depict a university system that is not a space for equality – despite what we might expect of a meritocratic system. Women constitute a minority in positions of power and among high officials in university structures. This document analyses the possible causes in the decrease in women’s participation after defending their doctoral theses, a key moment that represents the start of the glass ceiling. It delves into the relationship between co-optation systems, male power networks, and the allocation of pre-doctoral grants.","PeriodicalId":41648,"journal":{"name":"Metode Science Studies Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"112-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking the glass ceiling: The doctoral thesis defence as a key turning point\",\"authors\":\"Nazareth Gallego Morón\",\"doi\":\"10.7203/METODE.7.8077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Statistics depict a university system that is not a space for equality – despite what we might expect of a meritocratic system. Women constitute a minority in positions of power and among high officials in university structures. This document analyses the possible causes in the decrease in women’s participation after defending their doctoral theses, a key moment that represents the start of the glass ceiling. It delves into the relationship between co-optation systems, male power networks, and the allocation of pre-doctoral grants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"112-119\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metode Science Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7203/METODE.7.8077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metode Science Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/METODE.7.8077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

统计数据显示,大学系统并不是一个平等的空间——尽管我们可能期望一个精英体系。妇女在掌握权力的职位和大学机构的高级官员中占少数。本文分析了女性在博士论文答辩后参与率下降的可能原因,这是一个代表玻璃天花板开始的关键时刻。它深入研究了竞聘制度、男性权力网络和博士预科拨款分配之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Breaking the glass ceiling: The doctoral thesis defence as a key turning point
Statistics depict a university system that is not a space for equality – despite what we might expect of a meritocratic system. Women constitute a minority in positions of power and among high officials in university structures. This document analyses the possible causes in the decrease in women’s participation after defending their doctoral theses, a key moment that represents the start of the glass ceiling. It delves into the relationship between co-optation systems, male power networks, and the allocation of pre-doctoral grants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metode Science Studies Journal
Metode Science Studies Journal HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信