专业医学环境中姑息治疗质量分析:一项观察性研究。

Q3 Medicine
Francesca Napolitano, Mattia Francesco Bussa, Donatella Cristilli
{"title":"专业医学环境中姑息治疗质量分析:一项观察性研究。","authors":"Francesca Napolitano, Mattia Francesco Bussa, Donatella Cristilli","doi":"10.7429/pi.2021.744270a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND Recently health economic expenditure has increased considerably determining an increased awareness of excessive use of \"low-value care\" treatments, especially for chronic-degenerative diseases. AIM Describing Quality of life (QoL) of patients and palliative care's skills of nurses in internal medicine unit. METHODS Observational study conducted in an internal medicine unit that admit patients with chronic critical illness. Patients' QoL was measured with the integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), and nursing staff skills regarding palliative care with the Questionnaire of Professional Skills Nurses in Palliative Care (QVPICP). IPOS was administered at admission and one week later. RESULTS All the patients (n=13) accepted to participate to the study (mean age 80 years; SD  15). Eight (61%) were female. All the nurses invited (n=17) completed the QCPICP. Most of them was female (70%). The mean age was 40 years SD  14. Nurses perceived they have skills, knowledge, and abilities to approach patient's palliative care path (mean QVPICP: 7). IPOS means scores were worse in the following variables: pain (before: 3; after: 4); lack of mobility (before: 3; after: 4); sleepiness (before: 3; after: 4); depression (before: 3; after: 4). CONCLUSION Patient's QoL showed a worsening in the after assessment. Although nurses perceived themselves skilled in taking care of patients with palliative care needs, organizations may not allow nurses to perform their role to the best of their competencies. NURSING IMPLICATION Team briefing and debriefings in internal medicine unit may promote a holistic approach aimed at improving patients' QoL.","PeriodicalId":34911,"journal":{"name":"Professioni infermieristiche","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of quality palliative care in a specialized medicine setting: an observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Napolitano, Mattia Francesco Bussa, Donatella Cristilli\",\"doi\":\"10.7429/pi.2021.744270a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND Recently health economic expenditure has increased considerably determining an increased awareness of excessive use of \\\"low-value care\\\" treatments, especially for chronic-degenerative diseases. AIM Describing Quality of life (QoL) of patients and palliative care's skills of nurses in internal medicine unit. METHODS Observational study conducted in an internal medicine unit that admit patients with chronic critical illness. Patients' QoL was measured with the integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), and nursing staff skills regarding palliative care with the Questionnaire of Professional Skills Nurses in Palliative Care (QVPICP). IPOS was administered at admission and one week later. RESULTS All the patients (n=13) accepted to participate to the study (mean age 80 years; SD  15). Eight (61%) were female. All the nurses invited (n=17) completed the QCPICP. Most of them was female (70%). The mean age was 40 years SD  14. Nurses perceived they have skills, knowledge, and abilities to approach patient's palliative care path (mean QVPICP: 7). IPOS means scores were worse in the following variables: pain (before: 3; after: 4); lack of mobility (before: 3; after: 4); sleepiness (before: 3; after: 4); depression (before: 3; after: 4). CONCLUSION Patient's QoL showed a worsening in the after assessment. Although nurses perceived themselves skilled in taking care of patients with palliative care needs, organizations may not allow nurses to perform their role to the best of their competencies. NURSING IMPLICATION Team briefing and debriefings in internal medicine unit may promote a holistic approach aimed at improving patients' QoL.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Professioni infermieristiche\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Professioni infermieristiche\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.744270a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Professioni infermieristiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7429/pi.2021.744270a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近,卫生经济支出大幅增加,这决定了人们越来越意识到过度使用“低价值护理”治疗,特别是慢性退行性疾病。目的:描述内科病人的生活质量和护士的姑息治疗技能。方法对某内科收治的慢性危重症患者进行观察性研究。采用综合姑息治疗结局量表(IPOS)测量患者的生活质量,采用护士姑息治疗专业技能问卷(QVPICP)测量护理人员的姑息治疗技能。在入院时和一周后分别进行IPOS。结果所有患者(n=13)接受参与研究(平均年龄80岁;SD 15)。其中8名(61%)为女性。所有入选护士(n=17)均完成了QCPICP。其中以女性居多(70%)。平均年龄为40岁,标准差14。护士认为他们有技能、知识和能力接近病人的姑息治疗路径(平均QVPICP: 7)。IPOS意味着在以下变量得分较差:疼痛(之前:3;后:4);缺乏流动性(以前:3;后:4);睡意(之前:3;后:4);抑郁(之前:3;结论术后患者的生活质量明显下降。尽管护士认为自己有能力照顾有姑息治疗需求的病人,但组织可能不允许护士尽其所能地发挥自己的作用。护理意义:在内科进行团队简报和情况汇报,可以促进以改善患者生活质量为目标的整体方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of quality palliative care in a specialized medicine setting: an observational study.
BACKGROUND Recently health economic expenditure has increased considerably determining an increased awareness of excessive use of "low-value care" treatments, especially for chronic-degenerative diseases. AIM Describing Quality of life (QoL) of patients and palliative care's skills of nurses in internal medicine unit. METHODS Observational study conducted in an internal medicine unit that admit patients with chronic critical illness. Patients' QoL was measured with the integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS), and nursing staff skills regarding palliative care with the Questionnaire of Professional Skills Nurses in Palliative Care (QVPICP). IPOS was administered at admission and one week later. RESULTS All the patients (n=13) accepted to participate to the study (mean age 80 years; SD  15). Eight (61%) were female. All the nurses invited (n=17) completed the QCPICP. Most of them was female (70%). The mean age was 40 years SD  14. Nurses perceived they have skills, knowledge, and abilities to approach patient's palliative care path (mean QVPICP: 7). IPOS means scores were worse in the following variables: pain (before: 3; after: 4); lack of mobility (before: 3; after: 4); sleepiness (before: 3; after: 4); depression (before: 3; after: 4). CONCLUSION Patient's QoL showed a worsening in the after assessment. Although nurses perceived themselves skilled in taking care of patients with palliative care needs, organizations may not allow nurses to perform their role to the best of their competencies. NURSING IMPLICATION Team briefing and debriefings in internal medicine unit may promote a holistic approach aimed at improving patients' QoL.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Professioni infermieristiche
Professioni infermieristiche Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Professioni Infermieristiche pubblica, previa approvazione del Comitato di Redazione (CdR), articoli relativi alle diverse funzioni ed ambiti della professione infermieristica e ostetrica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信