会计伦理的实证研究——系统文献综述

Anna Kamińska-Stańczak, Sylwia Silska-Gembka
{"title":"会计伦理的实证研究——系统文献综述","authors":"Anna Kamińska-Stańczak, Sylwia Silska-Gembka","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.2348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to summarize and evaluate previous research of Polish authors in the field of accounting ethics; identify the main trends in empirical research and organize the research findings; establish and assess the scope of reporting for individual elements of the research process; identify the research gaps that inspire further research.\nMethodology/approach: A systematic literature review was conducted, including bibliometric analysis and content analysis of 35 publications.\nFindings: Ethics in accounting as a research area is currently only at the development stage. At the same time, a variety of research interests is noticeable, the most common of which is to identify the motives and causes of unethical behavior. All studies except one were based on non-random sampling. The vast majority of the research was questionnaire; in half of the cases, the research group consisted of students. Recommendations were made regarding the methodological rigor of further research. The methodological shortcomings make it im-possible to replicate the research conducted so far. Thanks to the identification of research gaps, directions for further scientific research were determined.\nResearch limitations/implications: The review was limited to scientific journals only due to the necessity to standardize the sources of publication of research results.\nOriginality/value: Conclusions from the review may inspire others to undertake research in previously unexplored areas. It may also be a guide to ensure the best possible quality.\n\n","PeriodicalId":53342,"journal":{"name":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical research on ethics in accounting – a systematic literature review\",\"authors\":\"Anna Kamińska-Stańczak, Sylwia Silska-Gembka\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.2348\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to summarize and evaluate previous research of Polish authors in the field of accounting ethics; identify the main trends in empirical research and organize the research findings; establish and assess the scope of reporting for individual elements of the research process; identify the research gaps that inspire further research.\\nMethodology/approach: A systematic literature review was conducted, including bibliometric analysis and content analysis of 35 publications.\\nFindings: Ethics in accounting as a research area is currently only at the development stage. At the same time, a variety of research interests is noticeable, the most common of which is to identify the motives and causes of unethical behavior. All studies except one were based on non-random sampling. The vast majority of the research was questionnaire; in half of the cases, the research group consisted of students. Recommendations were made regarding the methodological rigor of further research. The methodological shortcomings make it im-possible to replicate the research conducted so far. Thanks to the identification of research gaps, directions for further scientific research were determined.\\nResearch limitations/implications: The review was limited to scientific journals only due to the necessity to standardize the sources of publication of research results.\\nOriginality/value: Conclusions from the review may inspire others to undertake research in previously unexplored areas. It may also be a guide to ensure the best possible quality.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":53342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2348\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowosci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.2348","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本文的目的是总结和评价波兰作者在会计伦理领域的研究;识别实证研究的主要趋势,整理研究成果;建立和评估研究过程中个别要素的报告范围;找出能激发进一步研究的研究空白。方法/方法:对35篇文献进行系统文献综述,包括文献计量学分析和内容分析。研究发现:会计伦理作为一个研究领域目前仅处于发展阶段。与此同时,各种各样的研究兴趣是显而易见的,其中最常见的是确定不道德行为的动机和原因。除一项研究外,所有研究均基于非随机抽样。绝大多数的研究是问卷调查;在一半的案例中,研究小组由学生组成。就进一步研究方法的严谨性提出了建议。方法上的缺陷使迄今为止所进行的研究无法复制。由于发现了研究空白,确定了进一步科学研究的方向。研究限制/启示:由于有必要规范研究结果的发表来源,本综述仅局限于科学期刊。原创性/价值:评论的结论可能会激励其他人在以前未探索的领域进行研究。它也可以作为确保最佳质量的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Empirical research on ethics in accounting – a systematic literature review
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to summarize and evaluate previous research of Polish authors in the field of accounting ethics; identify the main trends in empirical research and organize the research findings; establish and assess the scope of reporting for individual elements of the research process; identify the research gaps that inspire further research. Methodology/approach: A systematic literature review was conducted, including bibliometric analysis and content analysis of 35 publications. Findings: Ethics in accounting as a research area is currently only at the development stage. At the same time, a variety of research interests is noticeable, the most common of which is to identify the motives and causes of unethical behavior. All studies except one were based on non-random sampling. The vast majority of the research was questionnaire; in half of the cases, the research group consisted of students. Recommendations were made regarding the methodological rigor of further research. The methodological shortcomings make it im-possible to replicate the research conducted so far. Thanks to the identification of research gaps, directions for further scientific research were determined. Research limitations/implications: The review was limited to scientific journals only due to the necessity to standardize the sources of publication of research results. Originality/value: Conclusions from the review may inspire others to undertake research in previously unexplored areas. It may also be a guide to ensure the best possible quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信