Muspilli ecdotico忘了一个问题:曼Docen笔录,但ß和Schmeller

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Verio Santoro
{"title":"Muspilli ecdotico忘了一个问题:曼Docen笔录,但ß和Schmeller","authors":"Verio Santoro","doi":"10.6092/LEF_25_P207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.","PeriodicalId":40434,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica e Filologia","volume":"25 1","pages":"207-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un dimenticato problema ecdotico del Muspilli: le trascrizioni di Docen, Maßmann e Schmeller\",\"authors\":\"Verio Santoro\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/LEF_25_P207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"207-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_25_P207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica e Filologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_25_P207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自1832年Schmeller的编辑原则以来,有关重建Muspilli文本的问题的复杂性就出现了。这是一个众所周知的事实,与文本的发现有关的错综复杂的事件已经延长了它的生态学问题的长长的清单。本文考察了多森、马斯曼和施米勒在1817年至1832年间制作的三种不同的Muspilli手抄本。Elias von Steinmeyer(1892)认为这三种抄本具有无关的生物学价值,从那时起就从Muspilli的研究中消失了。相反,本文将展示它们无可争辩的生态价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Un dimenticato problema ecdotico del Muspilli: le trascrizioni di Docen, Maßmann e Schmeller
The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linguistica e Filologia
Linguistica e Filologia LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信