{"title":"Muspilli ecdotico忘了一个问题:曼Docen笔录,但ß和Schmeller","authors":"Verio Santoro","doi":"10.6092/LEF_25_P207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.","PeriodicalId":40434,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica e Filologia","volume":"25 1","pages":"207-235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Un dimenticato problema ecdotico del Muspilli: le trascrizioni di Docen, Maßmann e Schmeller\",\"authors\":\"Verio Santoro\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/LEF_25_P207\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"207-235\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistica e Filologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_25_P207\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica e Filologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/LEF_25_P207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
自1832年Schmeller的编辑原则以来,有关重建Muspilli文本的问题的复杂性就出现了。这是一个众所周知的事实,与文本的发现有关的错综复杂的事件已经延长了它的生态学问题的长长的清单。本文考察了多森、马斯曼和施米勒在1817年至1832年间制作的三种不同的Muspilli手抄本。Elias von Steinmeyer(1892)认为这三种抄本具有无关的生物学价值,从那时起就从Muspilli的研究中消失了。相反,本文将展示它们无可争辩的生态价值。
Un dimenticato problema ecdotico del Muspilli: le trascrizioni di Docen, Maßmann e Schmeller
The complexity of problems concerning the reconstruction of the Muspilli text arose ever since the editio princeps of Schmeller in 1832. It is a well known fact that the intricate events linked to the discovery of the text have extended the already long list of its ecdotic problems. In this paper three different handwritten transcriptions of the Muspilli made by Docen, Masmann and Schmeller between 1817 and 1832 are examined. Considered of irrelevant ecdotic value by Elias von Steinmeyer (1892), these three transcriptions have disappeared from the studies on the Muspilli since then. The present paper instead, will show their indisputable ecdotic merit.