大流行和卫生紧急情况下的研究伦理

IF 0.3 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Mathieu Bourhis
{"title":"大流行和卫生紧急情况下的研究伦理","authors":"Mathieu Bourhis","doi":"10.7202/1089797ar","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous ethical questions have emerged since mid-March 2020 in France as a result of the Covid-19 crisis. The research issues are tested and questioned despite the indisputable results since the year 2021. During this pandemic, the boundaries of research methodology have been broken and many treatments and vaccines have been promoted to patients and authorities without maximum scientific integrity. Between a scientific race on the side of physician-researchers and the methodology of the urgency to provide care, it is interesting to take to stock of the respect of research methodology and its pretests, its limits with regard to the emergency and the autonomy of research ethics.","PeriodicalId":37334,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Éthique de la recherche en période de pandémie et d’urgence sanitaire\",\"authors\":\"Mathieu Bourhis\",\"doi\":\"10.7202/1089797ar\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous ethical questions have emerged since mid-March 2020 in France as a result of the Covid-19 crisis. The research issues are tested and questioned despite the indisputable results since the year 2021. During this pandemic, the boundaries of research methodology have been broken and many treatments and vaccines have been promoted to patients and authorities without maximum scientific integrity. Between a scientific race on the side of physician-researchers and the methodology of the urgency to provide care, it is interesting to take to stock of the respect of research methodology and its pretests, its limits with regard to the emergency and the autonomy of research ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37334,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7202/1089797ar\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7202/1089797ar","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自2020年3月中旬以来,由于新冠肺炎危机,法国出现了许多道德问题。自2021年以来,尽管研究结果无可争议,但研究问题仍受到考验和质疑。在这次大流行期间,研究方法的界限被打破,许多治疗方法和疫苗在没有最大限度的科学诚信的情况下被推广给患者和当局。在以医生研究人员为一方的科学竞赛和以提供护理的紧迫性为一方的方法学之间,对研究方法学及其预测试的尊重、研究方法学在紧急情况和研究伦理自主性方面的局限性进行评估是一件有趣的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Éthique de la recherche en période de pandémie et d’urgence sanitaire
Numerous ethical questions have emerged since mid-March 2020 in France as a result of the Covid-19 crisis. The research issues are tested and questioned despite the indisputable results since the year 2021. During this pandemic, the boundaries of research methodology have been broken and many treatments and vaccines have been promoted to patients and authorities without maximum scientific integrity. Between a scientific race on the side of physician-researchers and the methodology of the urgency to provide care, it is interesting to take to stock of the respect of research methodology and its pretests, its limits with regard to the emergency and the autonomy of research ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Bioethics
Canadian Journal of Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信