体育课程的初始教育评估:圣卡塔琳娜州一所公立大学毕业生的看法

IF 0.1 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Educacao Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.5902/1984644441376
W. D. N. Salles, Samara Escobar Martins, M. E. T. Luiz, A. C. D. A. Guimarães, Alcyane Marinho
{"title":"体育课程的初始教育评估:圣卡塔琳娜州一所公立大学毕业生的看法","authors":"W. D. N. Salles, Samara Escobar Martins, M. E. T. Luiz, A. C. D. A. Guimarães, Alcyane Marinho","doi":"10.5902/1984644441376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This mixed-methods study investigated the perceptions of Physical Education (PE) graduates on their education obtained at a public university in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. An online questionnaire was applied to collect information regarding the initial education of 94 graduates (50 bachelors and 44 teachers) trained under the new curricular proposal implemented in 2008 at the institution. Extension (8.35±1.51) and research activities (8.24±1.66) achieved the highest scores, with emphasis on the diversity of structures and options offered. The graduates’ classmates (7.45±1.73), due to the lack of dedication and commitment to the program, and the curricular structure (7.64±1.59), due to the problems in the courses’ semiannual organization, received the lowest ratings. Teachers evaluated their course higher than the bachelors, especially ISSN: 1984-6444 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376 Educação | Santa Maria | v. 46 |2021 Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao 2 in the components of faculty (T = 8.55±1.02; B = 7.28±1.37), classmates (T = 7.91±1.60; B = 7.04±1.76), physical infrastructure (T = 8.30±1.69; B = 7.64±1.34), supervised internships (T = 8.61±1.45; B = 7.72±1.73), and overall program evaluation (T = 8.64±1.10; B = 7.82±1.35). Factors such as supervised internships, curricular structure, faculty, and extension activities explained 59.0% of the variance of the overall program evaluation. Considering these results, those responsible for structuring the PE program can consolidate the practices and components that have been well evaluated, as well as think of alternatives to reduce the weaknesses and negative aspects perceived by the graduates.","PeriodicalId":44306,"journal":{"name":"Educacao","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial education evaluation of a Physical Education program: Perceptions of graduates from a public university in the state of Santa Catarina\",\"authors\":\"W. D. N. Salles, Samara Escobar Martins, M. E. T. Luiz, A. C. D. A. Guimarães, Alcyane Marinho\",\"doi\":\"10.5902/1984644441376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This mixed-methods study investigated the perceptions of Physical Education (PE) graduates on their education obtained at a public university in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. An online questionnaire was applied to collect information regarding the initial education of 94 graduates (50 bachelors and 44 teachers) trained under the new curricular proposal implemented in 2008 at the institution. Extension (8.35±1.51) and research activities (8.24±1.66) achieved the highest scores, with emphasis on the diversity of structures and options offered. The graduates’ classmates (7.45±1.73), due to the lack of dedication and commitment to the program, and the curricular structure (7.64±1.59), due to the problems in the courses’ semiannual organization, received the lowest ratings. Teachers evaluated their course higher than the bachelors, especially ISSN: 1984-6444 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376 Educação | Santa Maria | v. 46 |2021 Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao 2 in the components of faculty (T = 8.55±1.02; B = 7.28±1.37), classmates (T = 7.91±1.60; B = 7.04±1.76), physical infrastructure (T = 8.30±1.69; B = 7.64±1.34), supervised internships (T = 8.61±1.45; B = 7.72±1.73), and overall program evaluation (T = 8.64±1.10; B = 7.82±1.35). Factors such as supervised internships, curricular structure, faculty, and extension activities explained 59.0% of the variance of the overall program evaluation. Considering these results, those responsible for structuring the PE program can consolidate the practices and components that have been well evaluated, as well as think of alternatives to reduce the weaknesses and negative aspects perceived by the graduates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educacao\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项混合方法研究调查了巴西圣卡塔琳娜州一所公立大学体育毕业生对其教育的看法。通过一份在线问卷收集了94名毕业生(50名学士和44名教师)在2008年实施的新课程建议下接受培训的初始教育信息。扩展(8.35±1.51)和研究活动(8.24±1.66)得分最高,重点是结构的多样性和提供的选项。毕业生的同学(7.45±1.73)和课程结构(7.64±1.59)得分最低,前者是由于对课程缺乏投入和投入,后者是由于课程半年组织存在问题。教师对其课程的评价高于学士,特别是ISSN: 1984-6444 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376 educa o | Santa Maria | vs . 46 |2021 Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao 2在教师组成中(T = 8.55±1.02;B = 7.28±1.37),同班同学(T = 7.91±1.60;B = 7.04±1.76),物理基础设施(T = 8.30±1.69;B = 7.64±1.34),监督实习(T = 8.61±1.45;B = 7.72±1.73),总体方案评价(T = 8.64±1.10;B = 7.82±1.35)。监督实习、课程结构、教师和拓展活动等因素解释了总体项目评估差异的59.0%。考虑到这些结果,那些负责构建体育课程的人可以巩固已经得到很好评估的实践和组成部分,并考虑替代方案来减少毕业生所感受到的弱点和消极方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial education evaluation of a Physical Education program: Perceptions of graduates from a public university in the state of Santa Catarina
This mixed-methods study investigated the perceptions of Physical Education (PE) graduates on their education obtained at a public university in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil. An online questionnaire was applied to collect information regarding the initial education of 94 graduates (50 bachelors and 44 teachers) trained under the new curricular proposal implemented in 2008 at the institution. Extension (8.35±1.51) and research activities (8.24±1.66) achieved the highest scores, with emphasis on the diversity of structures and options offered. The graduates’ classmates (7.45±1.73), due to the lack of dedication and commitment to the program, and the curricular structure (7.64±1.59), due to the problems in the courses’ semiannual organization, received the lowest ratings. Teachers evaluated their course higher than the bachelors, especially ISSN: 1984-6444 | http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984644441376 Educação | Santa Maria | v. 46 |2021 Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/reveducacao 2 in the components of faculty (T = 8.55±1.02; B = 7.28±1.37), classmates (T = 7.91±1.60; B = 7.04±1.76), physical infrastructure (T = 8.30±1.69; B = 7.64±1.34), supervised internships (T = 8.61±1.45; B = 7.72±1.73), and overall program evaluation (T = 8.64±1.10; B = 7.82±1.35). Factors such as supervised internships, curricular structure, faculty, and extension activities explained 59.0% of the variance of the overall program evaluation. Considering these results, those responsible for structuring the PE program can consolidate the practices and components that have been well evaluated, as well as think of alternatives to reduce the weaknesses and negative aspects perceived by the graduates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educacao
Educacao EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
98
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信