确定建筑遗产振兴潜力的方法:伯尔尼市的经验教训

IF 0.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
G. Stanišić, Nadja Kurtović-Folić
{"title":"确定建筑遗产振兴潜力的方法:伯尔尼市的经验教训","authors":"G. Stanišić, Nadja Kurtović-Folić","doi":"10.5937/GRMK1501025S","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Serbian conservationists could learn a lot from the revitalization example of the Old city of Bern. Analyses of this example show that the method of revitalization and protection of listed, but abandoned and inhabited, buildings depends on its future use. Alone analyses of future purpose of built heritage cannot be used as a method for its revitalization. The use of new ideas based on historical importance of the protected building generates the building's structures. The approach of revitalization through the process of building structuring and adaptation to new purpose has been tested through different analyses. It was found that the future purpose of building cannot be determined only by defining the revitalization method, set by public body, but in this process the future owner of building should actively participate. The recommendations for transferring this methodology in solving Serbian built heritage problems are given.","PeriodicalId":40707,"journal":{"name":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","volume":"58 1","pages":"25-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for determination of revitalization potential of built heritage: Lessons learned on the city of Bern\",\"authors\":\"G. Stanišić, Nadja Kurtović-Folić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/GRMK1501025S\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Serbian conservationists could learn a lot from the revitalization example of the Old city of Bern. Analyses of this example show that the method of revitalization and protection of listed, but abandoned and inhabited, buildings depends on its future use. Alone analyses of future purpose of built heritage cannot be used as a method for its revitalization. The use of new ideas based on historical importance of the protected building generates the building's structures. The approach of revitalization through the process of building structuring and adaptation to new purpose has been tested through different analyses. It was found that the future purpose of building cannot be determined only by defining the revitalization method, set by public body, but in this process the future owner of building should actively participate. The recommendations for transferring this methodology in solving Serbian built heritage problems are given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40707,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"25-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/GRMK1501025S\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gradevnski Materijiali I Konstrukcije-Building Materials and Structures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/GRMK1501025S","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

塞尔维亚的自然资源保护主义者可以从伯尔尼老城的复兴中学到很多东西。对这一实例的分析表明,对已列入名录但被遗弃和有人居住的建筑进行振兴和保护的方法取决于其未来的用途。单独分析建筑遗产的未来用途不能作为其振兴的方法。基于受保护建筑的历史重要性,使用新的想法产生了建筑的结构。通过建筑结构和适应新目的的过程来振兴的方法已经通过不同的分析进行了测试。研究发现,不能仅仅通过公共机构制定的振兴方法来确定建筑的未来目的,而在这个过程中,建筑的未来所有者应该积极参与。提出了将这种方法应用于解决塞尔维亚建筑遗产问题的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methods for determination of revitalization potential of built heritage: Lessons learned on the city of Bern
Serbian conservationists could learn a lot from the revitalization example of the Old city of Bern. Analyses of this example show that the method of revitalization and protection of listed, but abandoned and inhabited, buildings depends on its future use. Alone analyses of future purpose of built heritage cannot be used as a method for its revitalization. The use of new ideas based on historical importance of the protected building generates the building's structures. The approach of revitalization through the process of building structuring and adaptation to new purpose has been tested through different analyses. It was found that the future purpose of building cannot be determined only by defining the revitalization method, set by public body, but in this process the future owner of building should actively participate. The recommendations for transferring this methodology in solving Serbian built heritage problems are given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信