饮用水处理巷中不同位置离子交换对天然有机物的去除

Q2 Engineering
A. Grefte, M. Dignum, E. Cornelissen, L. Rietveld
{"title":"饮用水处理巷中不同位置离子交换对天然有机物的去除","authors":"A. Grefte, M. Dignum, E. Cornelissen, L. Rietveld","doi":"10.5194/DWES-6-1-2013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. To guarantee a good water quality at the customers tap, natural organic matter (NOM) should be (partly) removed during drinking water treatment. The objective of this research was to improve the biological stability of the produced water by incorporating anion exchange (IEX) for NOM removal. Different placement positions of IEX in the treatment lane (IEX positioned before coagulation, before ozonation or after slow sand filtration) and two IEX configurations (MIEX® and fluidized IEX (FIX)) were compared on water quality as well as costs. For this purpose the pre-treatment plant at Loenderveen and production plant Weesperkarspel of Waternet were used as a case study. Both, MIEX® and FIX were able to remove NOM (mainly the HS fraction) to a high extent. NOM removal can be done efficiently before ozonation and after slow sand filtration. The biological stability, in terms of assimilable organic carbon, biofilm formation rate and dissolved organic carbon, was improved by incorporating IEX for NOM removal. The operational costs were assumed to be directly dependent of the NOM removal rate and determined the difference between the IEX positions. The total costs for IEX for the three positions were approximately equal (0.0631 € m−3), however the savings on following treatment processes caused a cost reduction for the IEX positions before coagulation and before ozonation compared to IEX positioned after slow sand filtration. IEX positioned before ozonation was most cost effective and improved the biological stability of the treated water.","PeriodicalId":53581,"journal":{"name":"Drinking Water Engineering and Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"45","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Natural organic matter removal by ion exchange at different positions in the drinking water treatment lane\",\"authors\":\"A. Grefte, M. Dignum, E. Cornelissen, L. Rietveld\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/DWES-6-1-2013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. To guarantee a good water quality at the customers tap, natural organic matter (NOM) should be (partly) removed during drinking water treatment. The objective of this research was to improve the biological stability of the produced water by incorporating anion exchange (IEX) for NOM removal. Different placement positions of IEX in the treatment lane (IEX positioned before coagulation, before ozonation or after slow sand filtration) and two IEX configurations (MIEX® and fluidized IEX (FIX)) were compared on water quality as well as costs. For this purpose the pre-treatment plant at Loenderveen and production plant Weesperkarspel of Waternet were used as a case study. Both, MIEX® and FIX were able to remove NOM (mainly the HS fraction) to a high extent. NOM removal can be done efficiently before ozonation and after slow sand filtration. The biological stability, in terms of assimilable organic carbon, biofilm formation rate and dissolved organic carbon, was improved by incorporating IEX for NOM removal. The operational costs were assumed to be directly dependent of the NOM removal rate and determined the difference between the IEX positions. The total costs for IEX for the three positions were approximately equal (0.0631 € m−3), however the savings on following treatment processes caused a cost reduction for the IEX positions before coagulation and before ozonation compared to IEX positioned after slow sand filtration. IEX positioned before ozonation was most cost effective and improved the biological stability of the treated water.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drinking Water Engineering and Science\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"45\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drinking Water Engineering and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/DWES-6-1-2013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drinking Water Engineering and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/DWES-6-1-2013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 45

摘要

摘要为了保证用户自来水的良好水质,在饮用水处理过程中应(部分)去除天然有机物质(NOM)。本研究的目的是通过加入阴离子交换(IEX)去除NOM来提高采出水的生物稳定性。比较了IEX在处理通道的不同放置位置(在混凝前、臭氧化前或慢砂过滤后)和两种IEX配置(MIEX®和流化IEX (FIX))的水质和成本。为此,以Loenderveen的前处理厂和Waternet的Weesperkarspel生产厂为例进行了研究。MIEX®和FIX都能在很大程度上去除NOM(主要是HS部分)。在臭氧氧化前和缓慢砂滤后,可以有效地去除NOM。在可吸收有机碳、生物膜形成速率和溶解有机碳方面,加入IEX对NOM的去除提高了生物稳定性。假设操作成本直接取决于NOM去除率,并决定了IEX位置之间的差异。三个位置的IEX总成本大致相等(0.0631欧元- 3),然而,与缓慢砂滤后的IEX相比,后续处理过程的节省使得在混凝和臭氧化之前的IEX位置的成本降低。放置在臭氧化之前的IEX是最具成本效益的,并且提高了处理后水的生物稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Natural organic matter removal by ion exchange at different positions in the drinking water treatment lane
Abstract. To guarantee a good water quality at the customers tap, natural organic matter (NOM) should be (partly) removed during drinking water treatment. The objective of this research was to improve the biological stability of the produced water by incorporating anion exchange (IEX) for NOM removal. Different placement positions of IEX in the treatment lane (IEX positioned before coagulation, before ozonation or after slow sand filtration) and two IEX configurations (MIEX® and fluidized IEX (FIX)) were compared on water quality as well as costs. For this purpose the pre-treatment plant at Loenderveen and production plant Weesperkarspel of Waternet were used as a case study. Both, MIEX® and FIX were able to remove NOM (mainly the HS fraction) to a high extent. NOM removal can be done efficiently before ozonation and after slow sand filtration. The biological stability, in terms of assimilable organic carbon, biofilm formation rate and dissolved organic carbon, was improved by incorporating IEX for NOM removal. The operational costs were assumed to be directly dependent of the NOM removal rate and determined the difference between the IEX positions. The total costs for IEX for the three positions were approximately equal (0.0631 € m−3), however the savings on following treatment processes caused a cost reduction for the IEX positions before coagulation and before ozonation compared to IEX positioned after slow sand filtration. IEX positioned before ozonation was most cost effective and improved the biological stability of the treated water.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drinking Water Engineering and Science
Drinking Water Engineering and Science Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信