确定从再分配支付计划中受益的农业控股地区集团:波兰案例研究

IF 0.8 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
A. Sadłowski
{"title":"确定从再分配支付计划中受益的农业控股地区集团:波兰案例研究","authors":"A. Sadłowski","doi":"10.5937/ekopolj2003655s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper was to answer the question of which area groups of Polish agricultural holdings had incurred loss on (and which had benefited from) applying the redistributive payment. Mathematical methods were applied. It was found that in the period between 2015 and 2019, holdings with a size of up to 6 ha and holdings with a size of over 55 ha incurred loss on the introduction of redistributive payment in its current form (some slight differences were identified as regards the threshold holding areas in individual years of the period in question). Thus, holdings with areas between 6 and 55 ha benefited from redistributive payment. The redistributive effects of the instrument are too weak in Poland to consider it a tool for accelerating positive structural transformations in agriculture.","PeriodicalId":45567,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","volume":"67 1","pages":"655-666"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of the area groups of agricultural holdings benefiting from the redistributive payment scheme: A Polish case study\",\"authors\":\"A. Sadłowski\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/ekopolj2003655s\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper was to answer the question of which area groups of Polish agricultural holdings had incurred loss on (and which had benefited from) applying the redistributive payment. Mathematical methods were applied. It was found that in the period between 2015 and 2019, holdings with a size of up to 6 ha and holdings with a size of over 55 ha incurred loss on the introduction of redistributive payment in its current form (some slight differences were identified as regards the threshold holding areas in individual years of the period in question). Thus, holdings with areas between 6 and 55 ha benefited from redistributive payment. The redistributive effects of the instrument are too weak in Poland to consider it a tool for accelerating positive structural transformations in agriculture.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"655-666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2003655s\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2003655s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是回答波兰农业持有的哪些地区集团因实施再分配支付而蒙受损失(哪些地区集团因实施再分配支付而受益)的问题。采用了数学方法。研究发现,在2015年至2019年期间,规模不超过6公顷的控股和规模超过55公顷的控股在采用当前形式的再分配支付时发生了亏损(在所述期间的各个年份,在阈值持有面积方面发现了一些细微的差异)。因此,面积在6至55公顷之间的土地从再分配支付中受益。在波兰,该工具的再分配效果太弱,无法将其视为加速农业积极结构转型的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of the area groups of agricultural holdings benefiting from the redistributive payment scheme: A Polish case study
The aim of this paper was to answer the question of which area groups of Polish agricultural holdings had incurred loss on (and which had benefited from) applying the redistributive payment. Mathematical methods were applied. It was found that in the period between 2015 and 2019, holdings with a size of up to 6 ha and holdings with a size of over 55 ha incurred loss on the introduction of redistributive payment in its current form (some slight differences were identified as regards the threshold holding areas in individual years of the period in question). Thus, holdings with areas between 6 and 55 ha benefited from redistributive payment. The redistributive effects of the instrument are too weak in Poland to consider it a tool for accelerating positive structural transformations in agriculture.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信