《绝望主妇》几集中人物在撒谎中对会话准则的多次违背

Anneke H. Tupan, Helen Natalia
{"title":"《绝望主妇》几集中人物在撒谎中对会话准则的多次违背","authors":"Anneke H. Tupan, Helen Natalia","doi":"10.9744/KATA.10.1.63-78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study on the characters' multiple violations in Desperate Housewives film shows that in violating the maxims, each person has his own reason specifically in lying. Using Grice's Cooperative Principle and Christoffersen's criteria of lying, the findings revealed that violating all maxims was meant to eliminate the interlocutor's chance to respond, violating three maxims was to cover the truth and violating two maxims was to create another lie in the future.","PeriodicalId":30120,"journal":{"name":"Kta A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature","volume":"10 1","pages":"63-78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Multiple Violations of Conversational Maxims in Lying Done by the Characters in Some Episodes of Desperate Housewives\",\"authors\":\"Anneke H. Tupan, Helen Natalia\",\"doi\":\"10.9744/KATA.10.1.63-78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study on the characters' multiple violations in Desperate Housewives film shows that in violating the maxims, each person has his own reason specifically in lying. Using Grice's Cooperative Principle and Christoffersen's criteria of lying, the findings revealed that violating all maxims was meant to eliminate the interlocutor's chance to respond, violating three maxims was to cover the truth and violating two maxims was to create another lie in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kta A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"63-78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"34\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kta A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9744/KATA.10.1.63-78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kta A Biannual Publication on the Study of Language and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9744/KATA.10.1.63-78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

摘要

通过对电影《绝望主妇》中人物多重违犯行为的研究,可以发现每个人在违犯格言时都有自己的理由,特别是在说谎方面。利用Grice’s Cooperative Principle和Christoffersen’s criteria的谎言标准,研究发现违反所有准则意味着消除对话者的回应机会,违反三条准则意味着掩盖真相,违反两条准则意味着在未来制造另一个谎言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Multiple Violations of Conversational Maxims in Lying Done by the Characters in Some Episodes of Desperate Housewives
The study on the characters' multiple violations in Desperate Housewives film shows that in violating the maxims, each person has his own reason specifically in lying. Using Grice's Cooperative Principle and Christoffersen's criteria of lying, the findings revealed that violating all maxims was meant to eliminate the interlocutor's chance to respond, violating three maxims was to cover the truth and violating two maxims was to create another lie in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信