欧盟法律在拉脱维亚法院的适用

A. Buka, Edmunds Broks
{"title":"欧盟法律在拉脱维亚法院的适用","authors":"A. Buka, Edmunds Broks","doi":"10.5937/spz65-34937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article outlines the main changes that the system of Latvian courts faced after Latvia's accession to the EU. In the legislative field Latvia has added in its procedural laws general provisions that incorporate EU law into Latvia's legal system, as well as the possibility of national courts to apply preliminary rulings procedure. During Latvia's EU membership, Latvian courts have adapted to their role in the application of the EU law, especially in the area of administrative law. Latvian courts have referred to the Court of Justice of the EU for preliminary rulings in over 100 cases, mostly from administrative courts. This corresponds with general tendencies in other new EU Member States. However, the fact that there are very few requests for preliminary rulings from courts that are not the courts of the last instance in Latvia, suggests that Latvian courts of first instances are somewhat unwilling to make use of the preliminary rulings procedure and do not see the benefits in its use.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of the EU law in Latvian courts\",\"authors\":\"A. Buka, Edmunds Broks\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/spz65-34937\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article outlines the main changes that the system of Latvian courts faced after Latvia's accession to the EU. In the legislative field Latvia has added in its procedural laws general provisions that incorporate EU law into Latvia's legal system, as well as the possibility of national courts to apply preliminary rulings procedure. During Latvia's EU membership, Latvian courts have adapted to their role in the application of the EU law, especially in the area of administrative law. Latvian courts have referred to the Court of Justice of the EU for preliminary rulings in over 100 cases, mostly from administrative courts. This corresponds with general tendencies in other new EU Member States. However, the fact that there are very few requests for preliminary rulings from courts that are not the courts of the last instance in Latvia, suggests that Latvian courts of first instances are somewhat unwilling to make use of the preliminary rulings procedure and do not see the benefits in its use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strani pravni zivot\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strani pravni zivot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-34937\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strani pravni zivot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz65-34937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文概述了拉脱维亚加入欧盟后,拉脱维亚法院系统所面临的主要变化。在立法领域,拉脱维亚在其程序法中增加了将欧盟法律纳入拉脱维亚法律制度的一般规定,并增加了国家法院适用初步裁决程序的可能性。在拉脱维亚成为欧盟成员国期间,拉脱维亚法院适应了其在欧盟法律适用方面的作用,特别是在行政法领域。拉脱维亚法院已向欧盟法院提交了100多个案件的初步裁决,其中大多数来自行政法院。这符合其他欧盟新成员国的一般趋势。然而,拉脱维亚非终审法院的法院很少要求作出初步裁决,这一事实表明,拉脱维亚的初审法院多少不愿意利用初步裁决程序,也没有看到使用初步裁决程序的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of the EU law in Latvian courts
This article outlines the main changes that the system of Latvian courts faced after Latvia's accession to the EU. In the legislative field Latvia has added in its procedural laws general provisions that incorporate EU law into Latvia's legal system, as well as the possibility of national courts to apply preliminary rulings procedure. During Latvia's EU membership, Latvian courts have adapted to their role in the application of the EU law, especially in the area of administrative law. Latvian courts have referred to the Court of Justice of the EU for preliminary rulings in over 100 cases, mostly from administrative courts. This corresponds with general tendencies in other new EU Member States. However, the fact that there are very few requests for preliminary rulings from courts that are not the courts of the last instance in Latvia, suggests that Latvian courts of first instances are somewhat unwilling to make use of the preliminary rulings procedure and do not see the benefits in its use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信