机械论哲学,“所有权”概念和人体部位的法律地位

Fábry Branislav
{"title":"机械论哲学,“所有权”概念和人体部位的法律地位","authors":"Fábry Branislav","doi":"10.5937/spz63-24028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article deals with the rise of philosophical concept of mechanism, especially in the period of Molecular Biology development and its impact on legal approach to human body. The new challenges such as cloning or human genome editing are key for the dominating concept of mechanism, however, there are some limits as well. The basic question seems to be how far we „own“ our bodies. There is also an increasing role of parents by the „enhancing“ of their children. All this trends seem to be influenced by mechanism, however it creates a threat for other rights of the „enhanced“ children.","PeriodicalId":33817,"journal":{"name":"Strani pravni zivot","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanist philosopy, concept of \\\"ownership\\\" and legal status of human body parts\",\"authors\":\"Fábry Branislav\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/spz63-24028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article deals with the rise of philosophical concept of mechanism, especially in the period of Molecular Biology development and its impact on legal approach to human body. The new challenges such as cloning or human genome editing are key for the dominating concept of mechanism, however, there are some limits as well. The basic question seems to be how far we „own“ our bodies. There is also an increasing role of parents by the „enhancing“ of their children. All this trends seem to be influenced by mechanism, however it creates a threat for other rights of the „enhanced“ children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33817,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strani pravni zivot\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strani pravni zivot\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz63-24028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strani pravni zivot","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/spz63-24028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了机制哲学概念的兴起,特别是分子生物学发展时期机制哲学概念的兴起对人体法学研究的影响。克隆或人类基因组编辑等新的挑战是机制概念主导的关键,但也存在一定的局限性。最基本的问题似乎是我们在多大程度上“拥有”自己的身体。通过“提高”孩子,父母的作用也越来越大。所有这些趋势似乎都受到机制的影响,但它对“增强”儿童的其他权利构成了威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanist philosopy, concept of "ownership" and legal status of human body parts
The article deals with the rise of philosophical concept of mechanism, especially in the period of Molecular Biology development and its impact on legal approach to human body. The new challenges such as cloning or human genome editing are key for the dominating concept of mechanism, however, there are some limits as well. The basic question seems to be how far we „own“ our bodies. There is also an increasing role of parents by the „enhancing“ of their children. All this trends seem to be influenced by mechanism, however it creates a threat for other rights of the „enhanced“ children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信