团队推理理论

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Smerilli
{"title":"团队推理理论","authors":"A. Smerilli","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.34359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he idea of we-thinking, or wereasoning, is increasingly drawing the attention of more and more economists. In its general formulation, it has been proposed by David Hodgson (1967), Donald Regan (1980), Margaret Gilbert (1989), Susan Hurley (1989), Raimo Tuomela (1995), and Martin Hollis (1998). Within this body of literature, Robert Sugden (1993, 2000, 2003) and Michael Bacharach (1995, 1997, 1999, 2006) have developed analytical frameworks from an economic point of view. The main claim of scholars that analyze we-thinking is that it can be endorsed by people when they face a decision problem. In fact, experimental evidence shows that, especially in some kind of games, such as coordination games, people do endorse we-thinking. However, the way in which we-thinking arises and how it brings people to behave in a particular way in games is a matter that requires further investigation.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"1 1","pages":"24-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theories of Team Reasoning\",\"authors\":\"A. Smerilli\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.34359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he idea of we-thinking, or wereasoning, is increasingly drawing the attention of more and more economists. In its general formulation, it has been proposed by David Hodgson (1967), Donald Regan (1980), Margaret Gilbert (1989), Susan Hurley (1989), Raimo Tuomela (1995), and Martin Hollis (1998). Within this body of literature, Robert Sugden (1993, 2000, 2003) and Michael Bacharach (1995, 1997, 1999, 2006) have developed analytical frameworks from an economic point of view. The main claim of scholars that analyze we-thinking is that it can be endorsed by people when they face a decision problem. In fact, experimental evidence shows that, especially in some kind of games, such as coordination games, people do endorse we-thinking. However, the way in which we-thinking arises and how it brings people to behave in a particular way in games is a matter that requires further investigation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"24-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.34359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.34359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

“我们思考”或“我们推理”的概念正日益引起越来越多经济学家的注意。David Hodgson(1967)、Donald Regan(1980)、Margaret Gilbert(1989)、Susan Hurley(1989)、Raimo Tuomela(1995)和Martin Hollis(1998)提出了它的一般公式。在这一文献中,Robert Sugden(1993,2000,2003)和Michael Bacharach(1995,1997,1999,2006)从经济角度发展了分析框架。分析自我思考的学者的主要主张是,当人们面临决策问题时,它可以得到人们的认可。事实上,实验证据表明,特别是在某些游戏中,比如协作游戏,人们确实认可自我思考。然而,我们的思维产生的方式以及它如何让人们在游戏中以特定方式行事是一个需要进一步研究的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theories of Team Reasoning
he idea of we-thinking, or wereasoning, is increasingly drawing the attention of more and more economists. In its general formulation, it has been proposed by David Hodgson (1967), Donald Regan (1980), Margaret Gilbert (1989), Susan Hurley (1989), Raimo Tuomela (1995), and Martin Hollis (1998). Within this body of literature, Robert Sugden (1993, 2000, 2003) and Michael Bacharach (1995, 1997, 1999, 2006) have developed analytical frameworks from an economic point of view. The main claim of scholars that analyze we-thinking is that it can be endorsed by people when they face a decision problem. In fact, experimental evidence shows that, especially in some kind of games, such as coordination games, people do endorse we-thinking. However, the way in which we-thinking arises and how it brings people to behave in a particular way in games is a matter that requires further investigation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philosophical Readings
Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信