妇女、政治和生育:自由主义的遗产

Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF Pub Date : 1996-01-01 DOI:10.5860/choice.34-3806

Ingrid Makus, Anne C. Minas

{"title":"妇女、政治和生育:自由主义的遗产","authors":"Ingrid Makus, Anne C. Minas","doi":"10.5860/choice.34-3806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Makus (political studies, Brock U.) examines the work of three political thinkers of the Western Tradition Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill to show that feminist interpretation of their writing is flawed in the belief that women are presented as naturally inferior to men in their capa","PeriodicalId":82477,"journal":{"name":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","volume":"11 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women, politics, and reproduction : the liberal legacy\",\"authors\":\"Ingrid Makus, Anne C. Minas\",\"doi\":\"10.5860/choice.34-3806\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Makus (political studies, Brock U.) examines the work of three political thinkers of the Western Tradition Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill to show that feminist interpretation of their writing is flawed in the belief that women are presented as naturally inferior to men in their capa\",\"PeriodicalId\":82477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-3806\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-3806","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 9

摘要

马库斯(政治研究，布洛克大学)研究了西方传统的三位政治思想家托马斯·霍布斯、约翰·洛克和约翰·斯图亚特·密尔的作品，以表明女权主义者对他们作品的解释是有缺陷的，因为他们认为女性在身份上天生不如男性

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Women, politics, and reproduction : the liberal legacy

Makus (political studies, Brock U.) examines the work of three political thinkers of the Western Tradition Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and John Stuart Mill to show that feminist interpretation of their writing is flawed in the belief that women are presented as naturally inferior to men in their capa

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Resources for feminist research : RFR = Documentation sur la recherche feministe : DRF

自引率

0.00%

发文量