角膜及测量眼压的方法

Sanamed Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5937/sanamed0-41040
E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić
{"title":"角膜及测量眼压的方法","authors":"E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić","doi":"10.5937/sanamed0-41040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.","PeriodicalId":53269,"journal":{"name":"Sanamed","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The cornea and methods for measuring intraocular pressure\",\"authors\":\"E. Jordanova, P. Hentova-Senćanić, I. Marjanović, Ivan Senčanin, Ivana Stefanović, M. Baralić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/sanamed0-41040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sanamed\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sanamed\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed0-41040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanamed","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/sanamed0-41040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

前言:本研究旨在确定角膜中央厚度(CCT)与眼压(IOP)之间的关系:Goldmann压平眼压(GAT)和动态等高线眼压(DCT)测量。材料与方法:纳入150例患者,平均年龄59.39±13.12岁。将患者分为3组:50例原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)、50例高眼压(OHT)和50例正常张力型青光眼(NTG)。用GAT和DCT测定眼压。超声测厚法测定CCT。结果:DCT测量的IOP高于GAT测量的IOP(19.80±3.67 mmHg vs 17.71±3.35 mmHg)。GAT测量IOP与DCT测量IOP在所有患者中均有显著正相关(r = 0.867, p < 0.01)。POAG患者GAT测IOP与DCT测IOP呈正相关(r = 0.855, p 0.05)。结论:采用GAT和DCT两种方法测量cct对IOP的影响。DCT不能代替GAT,但它非常有用,特别是在IOP GAT测量存在误差的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The cornea and methods for measuring intraocular pressure
Introduction: The study aimed to assert the relationship between central corneal thickness (CCT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by: Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometry (DCT). Materials and Methods: The study included 150 patients with a mean age of 59.39 ± 13.12 years. Patients were divided into three groups: 50 primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) patients, 50 ocular hypertension (OHT) patients, and 50 normal tension glaucoma (NTG) patients. IOP was determined using GAT and DCT. CCT was measured by ultrasound pachymetry. Results: IOP measured with DCT was higher than IOP measured with GAT (19.80 ± 3.67 mmHg vs 17.71 ± 3.35 mmHg). A significant positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT was found in all patients (r = 0.867, p < 0.01). A significantly positive association between IOP measured with GAT and IOP measured with DCT in POAG (r = 0.855, p <0.01), OHT (r = 0.826, p < 0.01), and NTG patients (r = 0.832, p < 0.01) were found. A significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with GAT (r = 0.198, p < 0.01), as well as a significant positive correlation between CCT and IOP measured with DCT was found (r = 0.198, p < 0.01) in all patients. There was no correlation between CCT and IOP measured neither with GAT nor with DCT separately in three patient groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: CCT-influenced IOP was measured by both methods, GAT and DCT. DCT can not replace GAT, but it is very useful, especially in cases where errors are in the IOP GAT measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信