面试偏见的申请人与耻辱:一个双重过程的方法

IF 0.3 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Alexander Buijsrogge, Wouter Duyck, Eva Derous
{"title":"面试偏见的申请人与耻辱:一个双重过程的方法","authors":"Alexander Buijsrogge, Wouter Duyck, Eva Derous","doi":"10.5553/geno/092150772015028004002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building on the dual process theory, this dissertation investigated how visual stigma (port-wine stains, tattoos) resulted in biased interview outcomes. At the core of dual process theory are two processes or distinct ways to process information, namely intuitive/reflexive processes (i.e., Type 1 processes) and more thoughtful/reactive processes (i.e., Type 2 processes) that drive decision-making situations (also interview decisions). Both processes can be active simultaneously and affect bias in interview outcomes. Study results showed that bias occurred early in the job interview. The initial impressions that interviewers form of applicants during the rapport-building stage of the job interview affected the interviewers' decision when applicants were stigmatized. The professionalism of the interviewer towards the stigmatized applicant was found to increase the interviewer's confidence in his/her interview capacities and (biased) judgment. Finally, the effect of stigmatizing applicant factors (i.e., tattoos) on interview outcomes was not necessarily negative, but contingent on context factors (i.e., open organizational culture, open-mindedness of the interviewer).","PeriodicalId":43933,"journal":{"name":"Gedrag & Organisatie","volume":"124 1","pages":"315-336"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interviewbias bij sollicitanten met een stigma: een duaalproces-benadering\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Buijsrogge, Wouter Duyck, Eva Derous\",\"doi\":\"10.5553/geno/092150772015028004002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Building on the dual process theory, this dissertation investigated how visual stigma (port-wine stains, tattoos) resulted in biased interview outcomes. At the core of dual process theory are two processes or distinct ways to process information, namely intuitive/reflexive processes (i.e., Type 1 processes) and more thoughtful/reactive processes (i.e., Type 2 processes) that drive decision-making situations (also interview decisions). Both processes can be active simultaneously and affect bias in interview outcomes. Study results showed that bias occurred early in the job interview. The initial impressions that interviewers form of applicants during the rapport-building stage of the job interview affected the interviewers' decision when applicants were stigmatized. The professionalism of the interviewer towards the stigmatized applicant was found to increase the interviewer's confidence in his/her interview capacities and (biased) judgment. Finally, the effect of stigmatizing applicant factors (i.e., tattoos) on interview outcomes was not necessarily negative, but contingent on context factors (i.e., open organizational culture, open-mindedness of the interviewer).\",\"PeriodicalId\":43933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gedrag & Organisatie\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"315-336\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gedrag & Organisatie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5553/geno/092150772015028004002\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gedrag & Organisatie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5553/geno/092150772015028004002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在双重过程理论的基础上,本论文研究了视觉污名(葡萄酒污渍,纹身)如何导致偏见的访谈结果。双重过程理论的核心是处理信息的两个过程或不同的方式,即直觉/反射过程(即第1类过程)和更深思熟虑/反应性过程(即第2类过程),它们驱动决策情况(也包括面试决策)。这两个过程可以同时活跃,并影响面试结果的偏见。研究结果表明,偏见在面试早期就出现了。面试官对应聘者在建立关系阶段的第一印象会影响应聘者被污名化时的面试决定。面试官对被污名化的应聘者的专业态度增加了面试官对自己面试能力和(有偏见的)判断的信心。最后,污名化的申请人因素(如纹身)对面试结果的影响并不一定是负面的,而是取决于环境因素(如开放的组织文化,面试官的开放性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interviewbias bij sollicitanten met een stigma: een duaalproces-benadering
Building on the dual process theory, this dissertation investigated how visual stigma (port-wine stains, tattoos) resulted in biased interview outcomes. At the core of dual process theory are two processes or distinct ways to process information, namely intuitive/reflexive processes (i.e., Type 1 processes) and more thoughtful/reactive processes (i.e., Type 2 processes) that drive decision-making situations (also interview decisions). Both processes can be active simultaneously and affect bias in interview outcomes. Study results showed that bias occurred early in the job interview. The initial impressions that interviewers form of applicants during the rapport-building stage of the job interview affected the interviewers' decision when applicants were stigmatized. The professionalism of the interviewer towards the stigmatized applicant was found to increase the interviewer's confidence in his/her interview capacities and (biased) judgment. Finally, the effect of stigmatizing applicant factors (i.e., tattoos) on interview outcomes was not necessarily negative, but contingent on context factors (i.e., open organizational culture, open-mindedness of the interviewer).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信