作为行政程序的次要主题的偏见问题

Q4 Social Sciences
Danilo Stevandić
{"title":"作为行政程序的次要主题的偏见问题","authors":"Danilo Stevandić","doi":"10.5937/pravzap0-33879","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The prejudicial question is a disputable (unresolved) legal issue which, as an independent legal issue, represents the subject of either court or other administrative procedure, and whose resolution decisively affects the decision on an administrative matter and thereby represents a secondary subject of an administrative procedure. The legal term \"preliminary question\" is not synonymous with the legal term \"prejudicial question\", and the term \"incidental question\" may be synonymous with it when used in a narrower sense. A prejudicial question acts as a factual issue in administrative proceedings since it is an element of the factual situation, even though it always represents a legal issue in its nature. The Republic of Serbia has been implementing a combined model with regards to resolving the prejudicial question, according to which the administrative body, except for cases prescribed by law, may choose to either consider and independently discuss the prejudicial question or terminate the proceedings until the court or other competent authority resolves the issue. The novelties introduced in the General Administrative Procedure Act (2016) limit the powers of administrative bodies in resolving prejudicial issues and thus create conditions for more consistent implementation of both the principle of separation of powers and rules on absolute incompetence in matters of great importance for the rights of individuals and the society as a whole.","PeriodicalId":53056,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Zapisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The prejudical question as a secondary subject of an administrative procedure\",\"authors\":\"Danilo Stevandić\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/pravzap0-33879\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The prejudicial question is a disputable (unresolved) legal issue which, as an independent legal issue, represents the subject of either court or other administrative procedure, and whose resolution decisively affects the decision on an administrative matter and thereby represents a secondary subject of an administrative procedure. The legal term \\\"preliminary question\\\" is not synonymous with the legal term \\\"prejudicial question\\\", and the term \\\"incidental question\\\" may be synonymous with it when used in a narrower sense. A prejudicial question acts as a factual issue in administrative proceedings since it is an element of the factual situation, even though it always represents a legal issue in its nature. The Republic of Serbia has been implementing a combined model with regards to resolving the prejudicial question, according to which the administrative body, except for cases prescribed by law, may choose to either consider and independently discuss the prejudicial question or terminate the proceedings until the court or other competent authority resolves the issue. The novelties introduced in the General Administrative Procedure Act (2016) limit the powers of administrative bodies in resolving prejudicial issues and thus create conditions for more consistent implementation of both the principle of separation of powers and rules on absolute incompetence in matters of great importance for the rights of individuals and the society as a whole.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53056,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravni Zapisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravni Zapisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-33879\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Zapisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-33879","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

偏见问题是一个有争议的(未解决的)法律问题,作为一个独立的法律问题,它代表了法院或其他行政程序的主体,它的解决决定性地影响了对行政事项的决定,因此代表了行政程序的次要主体。法律术语“预备问题”与法律术语“偏见问题”不同义,“附带问题”在狭义上可与之同义。偏见问题在行政诉讼中作为事实问题,因为它是事实情况的一个要素,尽管它在本质上总是代表一个法律问题。塞尔维亚共和国在解决偏见问题方面一直在执行一种综合模式,根据这种模式,除法律规定的情况外,行政机构可以选择审议和独立讨论偏见问题,或终止诉讼,直到法院或其他主管当局解决这个问题。《行政诉讼法》(2016年)的新规定限制了行政机关在解决偏见问题方面的权力,从而为更一致地执行三权分立原则和绝对无能规则创造了条件,这些规则对个人和整个社会的权利至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The prejudical question as a secondary subject of an administrative procedure
The prejudicial question is a disputable (unresolved) legal issue which, as an independent legal issue, represents the subject of either court or other administrative procedure, and whose resolution decisively affects the decision on an administrative matter and thereby represents a secondary subject of an administrative procedure. The legal term "preliminary question" is not synonymous with the legal term "prejudicial question", and the term "incidental question" may be synonymous with it when used in a narrower sense. A prejudicial question acts as a factual issue in administrative proceedings since it is an element of the factual situation, even though it always represents a legal issue in its nature. The Republic of Serbia has been implementing a combined model with regards to resolving the prejudicial question, according to which the administrative body, except for cases prescribed by law, may choose to either consider and independently discuss the prejudicial question or terminate the proceedings until the court or other competent authority resolves the issue. The novelties introduced in the General Administrative Procedure Act (2016) limit the powers of administrative bodies in resolving prejudicial issues and thus create conditions for more consistent implementation of both the principle of separation of powers and rules on absolute incompetence in matters of great importance for the rights of individuals and the society as a whole.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pravni Zapisi
Pravni Zapisi Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信