法律多元主义:从拉美新宪政主义和土著法院陪审团制度看法律多元主义

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW
Giulia Parola, Thaiana Conrado Nogueira, Thomaz Muylaert de Carvalho Britto
{"title":"法律多元主义:从拉美新宪政主义和土著法院陪审团制度看法律多元主义","authors":"Giulia Parola, Thaiana Conrado Nogueira, Thomaz Muylaert de Carvalho Britto","doi":"10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Through the presented article we seek to analyze the way Indigenous Peoples insert themselves in the context of the new Latin American constitutionalism, with a special focus on the aspect of the legal pluralism and on the way the Indigenous Peoples act towards the Judiciary. For that, the paradigmatic cases of the Ecuadorian, Bolivian and also the Brazilian constitutions are analyzed. From there, we go to the concrete cases, where factual situations are verified, at least in theory, where the natives had an active participation in the judiciary criminal process in Brazil. The main goal of this article is to scrutinize how those cases configure what denominates as legal pluralism and in what standards the Brazil differentiates from the other Latin American countries on the legal custody of the indigenous rights and the recognition and respect of \"the other\", here understood as a native.","PeriodicalId":43129,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legal pluralism: an approach from the new latin american constitutionalism and the jury of the indigenous court\",\"authors\":\"Giulia Parola, Thaiana Conrado Nogueira, Thomaz Muylaert de Carvalho Britto\",\"doi\":\"10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Through the presented article we seek to analyze the way Indigenous Peoples insert themselves in the context of the new Latin American constitutionalism, with a special focus on the aspect of the legal pluralism and on the way the Indigenous Peoples act towards the Judiciary. For that, the paradigmatic cases of the Ecuadorian, Bolivian and also the Brazilian constitutions are analyzed. From there, we go to the concrete cases, where factual situations are verified, at least in theory, where the natives had an active participation in the judiciary criminal process in Brazil. The main goal of this article is to scrutinize how those cases configure what denominates as legal pluralism and in what standards the Brazil differentiates from the other Latin American countries on the legal custody of the indigenous rights and the recognition and respect of \\\"the other\\\", here understood as a native.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Investigacoes Constitucionais-Journal of Constitutional Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5380/rinc.v6i3.69579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

通过本文,我们试图分析土著人民在新的拉丁美洲宪政背景下融入自己的方式,特别关注法律多元化的方面以及土著人民对司法机构采取行动的方式。为此,本文分析了厄瓜多尔、玻利维亚和巴西宪法的典型案例。从那里,我们去具体的案件,事实情况得到核实,至少在理论上,当地人积极参与巴西的司法刑事程序。本文的主要目的是仔细研究这些案例如何构成所谓的法律多元主义,以及巴西在土著权利的法律保管和承认和尊重“他者”(这里被理解为土著)方面与其他拉丁美洲国家的区别在于什么标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Legal pluralism: an approach from the new latin american constitutionalism and the jury of the indigenous court
Through the presented article we seek to analyze the way Indigenous Peoples insert themselves in the context of the new Latin American constitutionalism, with a special focus on the aspect of the legal pluralism and on the way the Indigenous Peoples act towards the Judiciary. For that, the paradigmatic cases of the Ecuadorian, Bolivian and also the Brazilian constitutions are analyzed. From there, we go to the concrete cases, where factual situations are verified, at least in theory, where the natives had an active participation in the judiciary criminal process in Brazil. The main goal of this article is to scrutinize how those cases configure what denominates as legal pluralism and in what standards the Brazil differentiates from the other Latin American countries on the legal custody of the indigenous rights and the recognition and respect of "the other", here understood as a native.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
33.30%
发文量
10
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal’s editorial line follows the main research areas developed by the research group (NINC), with focus on the critic study of Constitutional Law and legal and political institutions, and their connections with democracy, state intervention, fundamental rights and theories of justice, with particular emphasis on issues inserted into the contact points with fields of Public Law intimately connected with Constitutional Law, such as Administrative Law, Electoral Law and Theory of the State.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信