Amplatzer血管塞的类型和大小是否影响肺动静脉畸形的封堵时间?

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 Medicine
A. A. Abdel Aal, M. Massoud, Dina Elantably
{"title":"Amplatzer血管塞的类型和大小是否影响肺动静脉畸形的封堵时间?","authors":"A. A. Abdel Aal, M. Massoud, Dina Elantably","doi":"10.5152/dir.2016.16120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE Occlusion time (OT) is an important factor in the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) since it can lead to serious complications. The purpose of our study is to calculate the OT of Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP, St Jude Medical), and correlate it to the type of the device used (AVP or AVP 2) and the percent of device oversizing. Technical success rates and complications were also recorded. METHODS We retrospectively studied a total of 19 patients with 47 PAVMs who received percutaneous transcatheter embolization therapy using either AVP or AVP 2. We recorded the location, type, feeding artery diameter, AVP device used, and OT of each PAVM. We correlated the percent of device oversizing and the type of AVP with the OT. We also studied the rate of persistence of PAVM for both devices. RESULTS Forty-six (98%) of the PAVMs were simple. Device diameters ranged from 4.0-16.0 mm with device oversizing ranging between 14% and 120%. There was a statistically significant difference in the OT of AVP and AVP 2 (3 min 54 s vs. 5 min 30 s, P = 0.030). There was a weak positive correlation between OT and device oversizing for AVP (r=0.246, P = 0.324) and AVP 2 (r=0.261, P = 0.240). No major complications were identified. Immediate technical success rate was 100%. CONCLUSION The use of AVP 2, and increase in device oversizing were not associated with reduction in the OT of PAVMs. There was no reported difference in safety between the two devices, and no major complications were noted.","PeriodicalId":50582,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","volume":"31 1","pages":"61-65"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/dir.2016.16120","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does the type and size of Amplatzer vascular plug affect the occlusion time of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations?\",\"authors\":\"A. A. Abdel Aal, M. Massoud, Dina Elantably\",\"doi\":\"10.5152/dir.2016.16120\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE Occlusion time (OT) is an important factor in the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) since it can lead to serious complications. The purpose of our study is to calculate the OT of Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP, St Jude Medical), and correlate it to the type of the device used (AVP or AVP 2) and the percent of device oversizing. Technical success rates and complications were also recorded. METHODS We retrospectively studied a total of 19 patients with 47 PAVMs who received percutaneous transcatheter embolization therapy using either AVP or AVP 2. We recorded the location, type, feeding artery diameter, AVP device used, and OT of each PAVM. We correlated the percent of device oversizing and the type of AVP with the OT. We also studied the rate of persistence of PAVM for both devices. RESULTS Forty-six (98%) of the PAVMs were simple. Device diameters ranged from 4.0-16.0 mm with device oversizing ranging between 14% and 120%. There was a statistically significant difference in the OT of AVP and AVP 2 (3 min 54 s vs. 5 min 30 s, P = 0.030). There was a weak positive correlation between OT and device oversizing for AVP (r=0.246, P = 0.324) and AVP 2 (r=0.261, P = 0.240). No major complications were identified. Immediate technical success rate was 100%. CONCLUSION The use of AVP 2, and increase in device oversizing were not associated with reduction in the OT of PAVMs. There was no reported difference in safety between the two devices, and no major complications were noted.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50582,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"61-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5152/dir.2016.16120\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2016.16120\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2016.16120","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

目的肺动静脉畸形(pulmonary arteriovenous malformations, PAVMs)的治疗中,栓塞时间(OT)是一个重要的因素,因为它会导致严重的并发症。我们研究的目的是计算Amplatzer血管塞(AVP, St Jude Medical)的OT,并将其与所使用的设备类型(AVP或avp2)和设备过大的百分比相关联。记录技术成功率和并发症。方法回顾性分析19例47例经皮动脉栓塞治疗的pavm患者,均采用AVP或avp2栓塞治疗。记录每个PAVM的位置、类型、供动脉直径、使用的AVP装置和OT。我们将设备过大的百分比和AVP的类型与OT联系起来。我们还研究了两种设备的PAVM持续率。结果单纯性pavm 46例(98%)。器件直径范围为4.0-16.0 mm,器件外径范围为14% - 120%。AVP和avp2的OT (3 min 54 s vs 5 min 30 s, P = 0.030)差异有统计学意义。AVP (r=0.246, P = 0.324)和avp2 (r=0.261, P = 0.240)的OT与器械过大呈弱正相关。未发现重大并发症。即时技术成功率为100%。结论avp2的使用和器械尺寸的增加与pavm的OT降低无关。两种装置的安全性无差异报道,也未发现重大并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does the type and size of Amplatzer vascular plug affect the occlusion time of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations?
PURPOSE Occlusion time (OT) is an important factor in the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) since it can lead to serious complications. The purpose of our study is to calculate the OT of Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP, St Jude Medical), and correlate it to the type of the device used (AVP or AVP 2) and the percent of device oversizing. Technical success rates and complications were also recorded. METHODS We retrospectively studied a total of 19 patients with 47 PAVMs who received percutaneous transcatheter embolization therapy using either AVP or AVP 2. We recorded the location, type, feeding artery diameter, AVP device used, and OT of each PAVM. We correlated the percent of device oversizing and the type of AVP with the OT. We also studied the rate of persistence of PAVM for both devices. RESULTS Forty-six (98%) of the PAVMs were simple. Device diameters ranged from 4.0-16.0 mm with device oversizing ranging between 14% and 120%. There was a statistically significant difference in the OT of AVP and AVP 2 (3 min 54 s vs. 5 min 30 s, P = 0.030). There was a weak positive correlation between OT and device oversizing for AVP (r=0.246, P = 0.324) and AVP 2 (r=0.261, P = 0.240). No major complications were identified. Immediate technical success rate was 100%. CONCLUSION The use of AVP 2, and increase in device oversizing were not associated with reduction in the OT of PAVMs. There was no reported difference in safety between the two devices, and no major complications were noted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (Diagn Interv Radiol) is the open access, online-only official publication of Turkish Society of Radiology. It is published bimonthly and the journal’s publication language is English. The journal is a medium for original articles, reviews, pictorial essays, technical notes related to all fields of diagnostic and interventional radiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信