德语次重音相关性的证据:动词前缀“ver-”的韵律限制

Q2 Arts and Humanities
B. Vogt
{"title":"德语次重音相关性的证据:动词前缀“ver-”的韵律限制","authors":"B. Vogt","doi":"10.4467/23005920spl.19.010.10990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This contribution deals with secondary stress in Modern Standard German (MSG) and its relevance in affixation using the verbal prefix ver -. While the pattern ver +stressed syllable or ver+ schwa is allowed, ver +unstressed syllable is avoided in contemporary German (see also Kaltenbacher 1999). Diachronical data reveals that in earlier stages this prosodic restriction was not as strong as in MSG. The consistency with which verbs with the pattern ver +unstressed syllable are discarded in MSG (confirmed by look-ups in corpora and dictionaries) is a strong argument for the hypothesis that the relinquishment is due to a form of blocking related to the stress properties of the direct base: The affix ver - needs a direct base with some initial prominence, that is with primary or secondary stress. The only (ap-parent) exception to this stress condition is a base containing a schwa syllable which seems to be “invisible” for the stress-seeking prefix. Verbal derivation with the prefix ver - demonstrates that the stress properties of the base have to be taken into account also with regard to secondary stress. The data provided in this paper can count as further evidence for the existence and relevance of secondary stress in Modern Standard German and its interaction with morphology.","PeriodicalId":37336,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evidence for the Relevance of Secondary Stress in German: Prosodic Restrictions in Verbal Prefixation with ver-\",\"authors\":\"B. Vogt\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/23005920spl.19.010.10990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This contribution deals with secondary stress in Modern Standard German (MSG) and its relevance in affixation using the verbal prefix ver -. While the pattern ver +stressed syllable or ver+ schwa is allowed, ver +unstressed syllable is avoided in contemporary German (see also Kaltenbacher 1999). Diachronical data reveals that in earlier stages this prosodic restriction was not as strong as in MSG. The consistency with which verbs with the pattern ver +unstressed syllable are discarded in MSG (confirmed by look-ups in corpora and dictionaries) is a strong argument for the hypothesis that the relinquishment is due to a form of blocking related to the stress properties of the direct base: The affix ver - needs a direct base with some initial prominence, that is with primary or secondary stress. The only (ap-parent) exception to this stress condition is a base containing a schwa syllable which seems to be “invisible” for the stress-seeking prefix. Verbal derivation with the prefix ver - demonstrates that the stress properties of the base have to be taken into account also with regard to secondary stress. The data provided in this paper can count as further evidence for the existence and relevance of secondary stress in Modern Standard German and its interaction with morphology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Polish Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Polish Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.19.010.10990\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Polish Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/23005920spl.19.010.10990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一贡献涉及现代标准德语(MSG)中的次重音及其与使用动词前缀ver -的词缀的相关性。虽然允许使用ver+重读音节或ver+弱读音的模式,但在现代德语中,要避免使用ver+非重读音节(参见Kaltenbacher 1999)。历时数据显示,在早期阶段,这种韵律限制不像味精那么强。具有ver +非重读音节模式的动词在味精中被丢弃的一致性(通过在语料库和字典中查找得到证实)有力地证明了这样一种假设,即这种放弃是由于与直接基的重音特性相关的一种阻塞形式:词缀ver -需要一个带有一些初始突出的直接基,即与主或次重音一起。这个重音条件的唯一例外(ap-parent)是一个包含弱读音节的碱基,对于寻找重音的前缀来说,这个音节似乎是“看不见的”。带前缀ver -的词性推导表明,在考虑次重音时,还必须考虑到词根的应力特性。本文所提供的数据可以进一步证明现代标准德语中二次重音的存在及其相关性及其与形态学的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evidence for the Relevance of Secondary Stress in German: Prosodic Restrictions in Verbal Prefixation with ver-
This contribution deals with secondary stress in Modern Standard German (MSG) and its relevance in affixation using the verbal prefix ver -. While the pattern ver +stressed syllable or ver+ schwa is allowed, ver +unstressed syllable is avoided in contemporary German (see also Kaltenbacher 1999). Diachronical data reveals that in earlier stages this prosodic restriction was not as strong as in MSG. The consistency with which verbs with the pattern ver +unstressed syllable are discarded in MSG (confirmed by look-ups in corpora and dictionaries) is a strong argument for the hypothesis that the relinquishment is due to a form of blocking related to the stress properties of the direct base: The affix ver - needs a direct base with some initial prominence, that is with primary or secondary stress. The only (ap-parent) exception to this stress condition is a base containing a schwa syllable which seems to be “invisible” for the stress-seeking prefix. Verbal derivation with the prefix ver - demonstrates that the stress properties of the base have to be taken into account also with regard to secondary stress. The data provided in this paper can count as further evidence for the existence and relevance of secondary stress in Modern Standard German and its interaction with morphology.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studies in Polish Linguistics
Studies in Polish Linguistics Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信