阿曼语-语言还是方言?历史和当代观点概述

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Anna Oczko
{"title":"阿曼语-语言还是方言?历史和当代观点概述","authors":"Anna Oczko","doi":"10.4467/20843917rc.21.011.14066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at presenting two concepts from the modern typology of the Romance languages, with a special focus on the Aromanian ethnolect. The first concept, which is widely accepted in the Romanian linguistics and was most prevalent before the Second World War, does not recognise Aromanian as a separate language, but treats it as one of four dialects of the Romanian language. The second movement, much closer to modern Romanist research at the international level, opts for a full autonomy of all Balkan Romance ethnolects and attributes to them statuses of national languages. It also negates the existence of a common Romanian language in the first millennium, arguing that the Balkan Romance languages developed independently from a late form of Balkan Latin around the 11th century.","PeriodicalId":53485,"journal":{"name":"Romanica Cracoviensia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions\",\"authors\":\"Anna Oczko\",\"doi\":\"10.4467/20843917rc.21.011.14066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims at presenting two concepts from the modern typology of the Romance languages, with a special focus on the Aromanian ethnolect. The first concept, which is widely accepted in the Romanian linguistics and was most prevalent before the Second World War, does not recognise Aromanian as a separate language, but treats it as one of four dialects of the Romanian language. The second movement, much closer to modern Romanist research at the international level, opts for a full autonomy of all Balkan Romance ethnolects and attributes to them statuses of national languages. It also negates the existence of a common Romanian language in the first millennium, arguing that the Balkan Romance languages developed independently from a late form of Balkan Latin around the 11th century.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romanica Cracoviensia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romanica Cracoviensia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917rc.21.011.14066\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/20843917rc.21.011.14066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是提出两个概念,从现代类型学的罗曼语,特别侧重于Aromanian民族。第一个概念在罗马尼亚语言学中被广泛接受,并且在第二次世界大战之前最为流行,它不承认Aromanian是一种独立的语言,而是将其视为罗马尼亚语言的四种方言之一。第二个运动,在国际层面上更接近现代罗马语研究,选择了所有巴尔干罗曼语民族的完全自治,并赋予他们民族语言的地位。它也否定了在第一个千年中存在一种共同的罗马尼亚语,认为巴尔干罗曼语是在11世纪左右从巴尔干拉丁语的晚期形式独立发展而来的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aromanian – Language or Dialect? Overview of Historical and Contemporary Opinions
This article aims at presenting two concepts from the modern typology of the Romance languages, with a special focus on the Aromanian ethnolect. The first concept, which is widely accepted in the Romanian linguistics and was most prevalent before the Second World War, does not recognise Aromanian as a separate language, but treats it as one of four dialects of the Romanian language. The second movement, much closer to modern Romanist research at the international level, opts for a full autonomy of all Balkan Romance ethnolects and attributes to them statuses of national languages. It also negates the existence of a common Romanian language in the first millennium, arguing that the Balkan Romance languages developed independently from a late form of Balkan Latin around the 11th century.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Romanica Cracoviensia
Romanica Cracoviensia Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Romanica Cracoviensia to czasopismo naukowe poświęcone kulturom - literaturom i językom - romańskim, czyli francuskim, hiszpańskim, katalońskim, portugalskim, galicyjskim, włoskim, rumuńskim i wielu mniejszym romańskim obszarom językowym.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信