纳米技术调控的统计方法:需要、优点和缺点

R. Cabello, J. Vega-baudrit, R. Zuluaga, P. Gañán
{"title":"纳米技术调控的统计方法:需要、优点和缺点","authors":"R. Cabello, J. Vega-baudrit, R. Zuluaga, P. Gañán","doi":"10.4236/jbnb.2020.111002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need to have an express regulation covering nanotechnology has been the subject of debate in the scientific literature and identified as one of the main subsets of nanotechnology field research. However, most countries still do not have regulatory framework in order to guarantee consumer safety. This is the case of Costa Rica, one of the most promising countries in Latin America in terms of biotechnology and nanotechnology. This article presents a statistical study about the position of industry, academia and government institutions on the need to expressly regulate nanotechnology in Costa Rica. A qualitative study consisting of a survey of 79 forms was done to individuals representing the community involved with nanotechnology and institutions responsible for ensuring the safety of the citizen’s health, to conclude that the nanotechnology regulation should be created to protect the consumer in Costa Rica. The research also proposes aspects that should be taken into account in its drafting as well as the variables on which decisions should be made to authorize the commercialization of nanomaterials based on the findings of the literature.","PeriodicalId":68623,"journal":{"name":"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)","volume":"11 1","pages":"14-32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical Approach to Regulation of Nanotechnology: Need, Advantages and Disadvantages\",\"authors\":\"R. Cabello, J. Vega-baudrit, R. Zuluaga, P. Gañán\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/jbnb.2020.111002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The need to have an express regulation covering nanotechnology has been the subject of debate in the scientific literature and identified as one of the main subsets of nanotechnology field research. However, most countries still do not have regulatory framework in order to guarantee consumer safety. This is the case of Costa Rica, one of the most promising countries in Latin America in terms of biotechnology and nanotechnology. This article presents a statistical study about the position of industry, academia and government institutions on the need to expressly regulate nanotechnology in Costa Rica. A qualitative study consisting of a survey of 79 forms was done to individuals representing the community involved with nanotechnology and institutions responsible for ensuring the safety of the citizen’s health, to conclude that the nanotechnology regulation should be created to protect the consumer in Costa Rica. The research also proposes aspects that should be taken into account in its drafting as well as the variables on which decisions should be made to authorize the commercialization of nanomaterials based on the findings of the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":68623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"14-32\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2020.111002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物材料与纳米技术(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/jbnb.2020.111002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在科学文献中,是否需要有一个涵盖纳米技术的明确规定一直是争论的主题,并被确定为纳米技术领域研究的主要子集之一。然而,大多数国家仍然没有监管框架,以保证消费者的安全。哥斯达黎加就是这种情况,它是拉丁美洲在生物技术和纳米技术方面最有前途的国家之一。这篇文章提出了一项关于工业界、学术界和政府机构在哥斯达黎加明确规范纳米技术的需要上的立场的统计研究。对代表参与纳米技术的社区的个人和负责确保公民健康安全的机构进行了一项包括79种形式的调查的定性研究,得出结论认为,应该制定纳米技术法规,以保护哥斯达黎加的消费者。该研究还提出了在起草过程中应该考虑的方面,以及根据文献的发现授权纳米材料商业化时应该做出决定的变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Statistical Approach to Regulation of Nanotechnology: Need, Advantages and Disadvantages
The need to have an express regulation covering nanotechnology has been the subject of debate in the scientific literature and identified as one of the main subsets of nanotechnology field research. However, most countries still do not have regulatory framework in order to guarantee consumer safety. This is the case of Costa Rica, one of the most promising countries in Latin America in terms of biotechnology and nanotechnology. This article presents a statistical study about the position of industry, academia and government institutions on the need to expressly regulate nanotechnology in Costa Rica. A qualitative study consisting of a survey of 79 forms was done to individuals representing the community involved with nanotechnology and institutions responsible for ensuring the safety of the citizen’s health, to conclude that the nanotechnology regulation should be created to protect the consumer in Costa Rica. The research also proposes aspects that should be taken into account in its drafting as well as the variables on which decisions should be made to authorize the commercialization of nanomaterials based on the findings of the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
317
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信