不同语言模式下二阶条件辨别的习得与转移

Agustín Daniel Gómez Fuentes , Emilio Ribes Iñesta
{"title":"不同语言模式下二阶条件辨别的习得与转移","authors":"Agustín Daniel Gómez Fuentes ,&nbsp;Emilio Ribes Iñesta","doi":"10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The functional interaction of language active mode (pointing, speaking, and writing) and reactive mode (observing, listening, and reading) were evaluated in a second-order conditional discrimination process. Two experiments were planned in which the relative effectiveness of each linguistic mode was compared, both within and between subjects, with or without the corresponding reactive mode. Twenty-four children’s of both sexes aged 8 to 12 experimentally naïve participated in the experiments. These were conducted in a test/post-test design in three learning sequences and transfer tests. The results showed the highest percentages of correct responses in matching during acquisition, maintenance and transference, when feedback was used. The highest translativity was observed from writing to speaking. The acquisition differences on conditional discrimination depend on the linguistic response mode and the absence or presence of the reactive feedback.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","volume":"6 1","pages":"Pages 89-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47606","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adquisición y transferencia de una discriminación condicional de segundo orden en distintos modos de lenguaje\",\"authors\":\"Agustín Daniel Gómez Fuentes ,&nbsp;Emilio Ribes Iñesta\",\"doi\":\"10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The functional interaction of language active mode (pointing, speaking, and writing) and reactive mode (observing, listening, and reading) were evaluated in a second-order conditional discrimination process. Two experiments were planned in which the relative effectiveness of each linguistic mode was compared, both within and between subjects, with or without the corresponding reactive mode. Twenty-four children’s of both sexes aged 8 to 12 experimentally naïve participated in the experiments. These were conducted in a test/post-test design in three learning sequences and transfer tests. The results showed the highest percentages of correct responses in matching during acquisition, maintenance and transference, when feedback was used. The highest translativity was observed from writing to speaking. The acquisition differences on conditional discrimination depend on the linguistic response mode and the absence or presence of the reactive feedback.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 89-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5460/jbhsi.v6.1.47606\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior, Health & Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2007078014702895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

语言主动模式(指、说、写)和被动模式(看、听、读)的功能互动在二级条件判别过程中被评价。我们计划了两个实验,比较每个语言模式的相对有效性,在受试者内部和受试者之间,有或没有相应的反应模式。24名8到12岁的男女儿童naïve参加了实验。这些研究采用测试/后测试设计,分为三个学习顺序和迁移测试。结果表明,在习得、维持和移情过程中,使用反馈时匹配正确率最高。从写作到口语,最高的翻译性被观察到。条件歧视习得差异取决于语言反应方式和有无反应性反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adquisición y transferencia de una discriminación condicional de segundo orden en distintos modos de lenguaje

The functional interaction of language active mode (pointing, speaking, and writing) and reactive mode (observing, listening, and reading) were evaluated in a second-order conditional discrimination process. Two experiments were planned in which the relative effectiveness of each linguistic mode was compared, both within and between subjects, with or without the corresponding reactive mode. Twenty-four children’s of both sexes aged 8 to 12 experimentally naïve participated in the experiments. These were conducted in a test/post-test design in three learning sequences and transfer tests. The results showed the highest percentages of correct responses in matching during acquisition, maintenance and transference, when feedback was used. The highest translativity was observed from writing to speaking. The acquisition differences on conditional discrimination depend on the linguistic response mode and the absence or presence of the reactive feedback.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信