I. Kaplan, I. Allon, B. Shlomi, V. Raiser, D. Allon
{"title":"口腔错构瘤与绒毛瘤的比较研究","authors":"I. Kaplan, I. Allon, B. Shlomi, V. Raiser, D. Allon","doi":"10.5455/JIHP.20151020122441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To compare the clinical and microscopic characteristics of hamartoma and choristoma of the oral mucosa and jaws and discuss the challenges in diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Analysis of patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, and literature review of the same years. A sub-classification into “single tissue” or “mixed-tissue” types was applied for all the diagnoses according to the histopathological description. Results: A total of 61 new cases of hamartoma or choristoma were retrieved, the majority were hamartoma. The literature analysis yielded 155 cases, of which 44.5% were choristoma. The majority of hamartoma were mixed. Among these, neurovascular hamartoma was the most prevalent type (36.7%). Of the choristoma, 59.4% were single tissue, with respiratory, gastric and cartilaginous being the most prevalent single tissue types. The tongue was the most frequent location of both groups. Conclusion: Differentiating choristoma from hamartoma depends to a great extent on the recognition of the normal tissues expected at every individual location.","PeriodicalId":91320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology","volume":"3 1","pages":"129-134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study of Oral Hamartoma and Choristoma\",\"authors\":\"I. Kaplan, I. Allon, B. Shlomi, V. Raiser, D. Allon\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/JIHP.20151020122441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To compare the clinical and microscopic characteristics of hamartoma and choristoma of the oral mucosa and jaws and discuss the challenges in diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Analysis of patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, and literature review of the same years. A sub-classification into “single tissue” or “mixed-tissue” types was applied for all the diagnoses according to the histopathological description. Results: A total of 61 new cases of hamartoma or choristoma were retrieved, the majority were hamartoma. The literature analysis yielded 155 cases, of which 44.5% were choristoma. The majority of hamartoma were mixed. Among these, neurovascular hamartoma was the most prevalent type (36.7%). Of the choristoma, 59.4% were single tissue, with respiratory, gastric and cartilaginous being the most prevalent single tissue types. The tongue was the most frequent location of both groups. Conclusion: Differentiating choristoma from hamartoma depends to a great extent on the recognition of the normal tissues expected at every individual location.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"129-134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/JIHP.20151020122441\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of interdisciplinary histopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/JIHP.20151020122441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study of Oral Hamartoma and Choristoma
Aim: To compare the clinical and microscopic characteristics of hamartoma and choristoma of the oral mucosa and jaws and discuss the challenges in diagnosis. Materials and Methods: Analysis of patients diagnosed between 2000 and 2012, and literature review of the same years. A sub-classification into “single tissue” or “mixed-tissue” types was applied for all the diagnoses according to the histopathological description. Results: A total of 61 new cases of hamartoma or choristoma were retrieved, the majority were hamartoma. The literature analysis yielded 155 cases, of which 44.5% were choristoma. The majority of hamartoma were mixed. Among these, neurovascular hamartoma was the most prevalent type (36.7%). Of the choristoma, 59.4% were single tissue, with respiratory, gastric and cartilaginous being the most prevalent single tissue types. The tongue was the most frequent location of both groups. Conclusion: Differentiating choristoma from hamartoma depends to a great extent on the recognition of the normal tissues expected at every individual location.