澄清《欧洲人权公约》的治外法权适用(Al-Skeini诉联合王国)

Merkourios Pub Date : 2012-02-26 DOI:10.5334/UJIEL.BA
Cedric Ryngaert
{"title":"澄清《欧洲人权公约》的治外法权适用(Al-Skeini诉联合王国)","authors":"Cedric Ryngaert","doi":"10.5334/UJIEL.BA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom , the European Court on Human Rights clarified the scope ratione loci of the European Convention on Human Rights. Without fully abandoning the territorial concept of jurisdiction, which it had affirmed in the 2001 Bankovic decision, the Court inched somewhat closer to the personal model of jurisdiction. After Al-Skeini , an ECHR Contracting State's exercise of public powers over a given territory, even in the absence of full effective control, may bring persons present in that territory within the State's jurisdiction. The Court did not, however, pronounce itself on the applicability of the ECHR in case (agents of ) a Contracting State exercise governmental authority over persons abroad without exercising public powers over the territory where these persons are located.","PeriodicalId":30192,"journal":{"name":"Merkourios","volume":"28 1","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clarifying the Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom)\",\"authors\":\"Cedric Ryngaert\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/UJIEL.BA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom , the European Court on Human Rights clarified the scope ratione loci of the European Convention on Human Rights. Without fully abandoning the territorial concept of jurisdiction, which it had affirmed in the 2001 Bankovic decision, the Court inched somewhat closer to the personal model of jurisdiction. After Al-Skeini , an ECHR Contracting State's exercise of public powers over a given territory, even in the absence of full effective control, may bring persons present in that territory within the State's jurisdiction. The Court did not, however, pronounce itself on the applicability of the ECHR in case (agents of ) a Contracting State exercise governmental authority over persons abroad without exercising public powers over the territory where these persons are located.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30192,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Merkourios\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"57-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-02-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Merkourios\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/UJIEL.BA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Merkourios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/UJIEL.BA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

摘要

在Al-Skeini诉联合王国案中,欧洲人权法院澄清了《欧洲人权公约》的属地范围。法院在没有完全放弃其在2001年班科维奇案判决中所肯定的属地管辖权概念的情况下,多少向属人管辖权模式靠拢了一点。在Al-Skeini案之后,《欧洲人权公约》缔约国对某一特定领土行使公共权力,即使在没有完全有效控制的情况下,也可能使在该领土上的人受到该国的管辖。然而,法院没有就缔约国(代理人)对国外人员行使政府权力而不对这些人员所在领土行使公共权力的情况下《欧洲人权公约》的适用性发表意见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clarifying the Extraterritorial Application of the European Convention on Human Rights (Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom)
In Al-Skeini v the United Kingdom , the European Court on Human Rights clarified the scope ratione loci of the European Convention on Human Rights. Without fully abandoning the territorial concept of jurisdiction, which it had affirmed in the 2001 Bankovic decision, the Court inched somewhat closer to the personal model of jurisdiction. After Al-Skeini , an ECHR Contracting State's exercise of public powers over a given territory, even in the absence of full effective control, may bring persons present in that territory within the State's jurisdiction. The Court did not, however, pronounce itself on the applicability of the ECHR in case (agents of ) a Contracting State exercise governmental authority over persons abroad without exercising public powers over the territory where these persons are located.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信