使用光散射法和β衰减法比较 PM2.5 监测数据:首尔地铁案例研究

IF 1.1 Q4 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Trieu-Vuong Dinh, Byeong-Gyu Park, Sang-Woo Lee, Jae-Hyung Park, Da-Hyun Baek, In-Young Choi, Ye-Bin Seo, Jo-Chun Kim
{"title":"使用光散射法和β衰减法比较 PM2.5 监测数据:首尔地铁案例研究","authors":"Trieu-Vuong Dinh,&nbsp;Byeong-Gyu Park,&nbsp;Sang-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Hyung Park,&nbsp;Da-Hyun Baek,&nbsp;In-Young Choi,&nbsp;Ye-Bin Seo,&nbsp;Jo-Chun Kim","doi":"10.5572/ajae.2022.116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A study on monitoring PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at an underground subway station using light scattering and beta attenuation methods was conducted. Six optical particle counters (OPCs), which were representative of the light scattering method and had 16 size channels, were installed at different sampling sites in the waiting room and platforms to compare PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, determine PM<sub>2.5</sub> /PM<sub>10</sub> ratios, and characterize the size distribution based on particle number. In terms of the beta attenuation method, a beta-ray attenuation monitor (BAM) was set up at the platform to compare it with OPCs for one month. It was found that 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations varied at different sampling sites depending on PM composition, while 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were independent of the sampling sites. There was a significant difference between the means of 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC when PM<sub>2.5</sub> contributed to less than 50% or higher than 80% of PM<sub>10</sub>. In contrast, the 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC showed the same patterns as each other with an insignificant difference. Therefore, an OPC can be used to monitor the 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration in an underground subway station. However, the use of OPC to measure the 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration should consider PM composition and other factors. In addition, more frequent calibration is needed on a regular basis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45358,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2022.116.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PM2.5 Monitoring Data Using Light Scattering and Beta Attenuation Methods: A Case Study in Seoul Metro Subway\",\"authors\":\"Trieu-Vuong Dinh,&nbsp;Byeong-Gyu Park,&nbsp;Sang-Woo Lee,&nbsp;Jae-Hyung Park,&nbsp;Da-Hyun Baek,&nbsp;In-Young Choi,&nbsp;Ye-Bin Seo,&nbsp;Jo-Chun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.5572/ajae.2022.116\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A study on monitoring PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations at an underground subway station using light scattering and beta attenuation methods was conducted. Six optical particle counters (OPCs), which were representative of the light scattering method and had 16 size channels, were installed at different sampling sites in the waiting room and platforms to compare PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations, determine PM<sub>2.5</sub> /PM<sub>10</sub> ratios, and characterize the size distribution based on particle number. In terms of the beta attenuation method, a beta-ray attenuation monitor (BAM) was set up at the platform to compare it with OPCs for one month. It was found that 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations varied at different sampling sites depending on PM composition, while 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations were independent of the sampling sites. There was a significant difference between the means of 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC when PM<sub>2.5</sub> contributed to less than 50% or higher than 80% of PM<sub>10</sub>. In contrast, the 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC showed the same patterns as each other with an insignificant difference. Therefore, an OPC can be used to monitor the 24h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration in an underground subway station. However, the use of OPC to measure the 1h-average PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration should consider PM composition and other factors. In addition, more frequent calibration is needed on a regular basis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45358,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.5572/ajae.2022.116.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2022.116\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.5572/ajae.2022.116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用光散射法和β衰减法对地下地铁站的 PM2.5 浓度进行了监测研究。在候车室和站台的不同采样点安装了六台光学颗粒计数器(OPC),它们是光散射法的代表,有 16 个粒径通道,用于比较 PM2.5 浓度、确定 PM2.5 /PM10 比率,以及根据颗粒数描述粒径分布特征。在贝塔衰减法方面,在月台设置了一个贝塔射线衰减监测器(BAM),与 OPCs 进行为期一个月的比较。结果发现,PM2.5的1小时平均浓度在不同采样点会因PM成分而异,而PM2.5的24小时平均浓度则与采样点无关。当PM2.5在PM10中所占比例低于50%或高于80%时,BAM和OPC观测到的PM2.5 1h平均浓度均值之间存在明显差异。相比之下,BAM和OPC观测到的24小时平均PM2.5浓度显示出相同的模式,差异不明显。因此,OPC 可用于监测地下地铁站的 PM2.5 24 小时平均浓度。不过,使用 OPC 测量 PM2.5 1 小时平均浓度应考虑 PM 成分和其他因素。此外,还需要定期进行更频繁的校准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of PM2.5 Monitoring Data Using Light Scattering and Beta Attenuation Methods: A Case Study in Seoul Metro Subway

A study on monitoring PM2.5 concentrations at an underground subway station using light scattering and beta attenuation methods was conducted. Six optical particle counters (OPCs), which were representative of the light scattering method and had 16 size channels, were installed at different sampling sites in the waiting room and platforms to compare PM2.5 concentrations, determine PM2.5 /PM10 ratios, and characterize the size distribution based on particle number. In terms of the beta attenuation method, a beta-ray attenuation monitor (BAM) was set up at the platform to compare it with OPCs for one month. It was found that 1h-average PM2.5 concentrations varied at different sampling sites depending on PM composition, while 24h-average PM2.5 concentrations were independent of the sampling sites. There was a significant difference between the means of 1h-average PM2.5 concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC when PM2.5 contributed to less than 50% or higher than 80% of PM10. In contrast, the 24h-average PM2.5 concentrations observed by the BAM and OPC showed the same patterns as each other with an insignificant difference. Therefore, an OPC can be used to monitor the 24h-average PM2.5 concentration in an underground subway station. However, the use of OPC to measure the 1h-average PM2.5 concentration should consider PM composition and other factors. In addition, more frequent calibration is needed on a regular basis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment
Asian Journal of Atmospheric Environment METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
22
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信