基础研究和应用开发研究标准化活动投入资源的计量及研究类型间计量结果的差异

Q4 Social Sciences
Suguru Tamura
{"title":"基础研究和应用开发研究标准化活动投入资源的计量及研究类型间计量结果的差异","authors":"Suguru Tamura","doi":"10.5571/SYNTHENG.6.166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the methods for measuring standardization activities in basic research and applied and development research. Such methods are supposed to enable more sophisticated management of innovation in organizations. This paper focuses on standardization activities relating to intellectual property, because such activities are thought to be strongly linked to innovation. Universities and technology licensing organizations were chosen as examples of basic research institutions. Companies in the electric machinery industry and information and communication industry were selected as examples of the applied and development research institutions. First, the stability of data over multiple years and the validity of the definition of standardization activities are discussed. Then, the difference in measurement results between basic research, and applied and development research is described. A hypothesis is proposed that the ratio of standardization activities in basic research is as high as that in applied and development research. Case of universities and technology licensing organizations, and the electric machinery industry 研究論文:基礎研究および応用・開発研究における標準化活動に係る投入資源の計量方法および差異について(田村)","PeriodicalId":39206,"journal":{"name":"Synthesiology","volume":"6 1","pages":"166-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measurement of input resources for standardization activities in basic research and applied and development research, and the difference of the measuring results between the research types\",\"authors\":\"Suguru Tamura\",\"doi\":\"10.5571/SYNTHENG.6.166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the methods for measuring standardization activities in basic research and applied and development research. Such methods are supposed to enable more sophisticated management of innovation in organizations. This paper focuses on standardization activities relating to intellectual property, because such activities are thought to be strongly linked to innovation. Universities and technology licensing organizations were chosen as examples of basic research institutions. Companies in the electric machinery industry and information and communication industry were selected as examples of the applied and development research institutions. First, the stability of data over multiple years and the validity of the definition of standardization activities are discussed. Then, the difference in measurement results between basic research, and applied and development research is described. A hypothesis is proposed that the ratio of standardization activities in basic research is as high as that in applied and development research. Case of universities and technology licensing organizations, and the electric machinery industry 研究論文:基礎研究および応用・開発研究における標準化活動に係る投入資源の計量方法および差異について(田村)\",\"PeriodicalId\":39206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synthesiology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"166-176\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5571/SYNTHENG.6.166\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5571/SYNTHENG.6.166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了标准化活动在基础研究和应用开发研究中的测量方法。这些方法被认为能够使组织中的创新管理更加复杂。本文的重点是与知识产权有关的标准化活动,因为这些活动被认为与创新密切相关。选择大学和技术许可组织作为基础研究机构的例子。选择电机行业和信息通信行业的公司作为应用和开发研究机构的例子。首先,讨论了多年数据的稳定性和标准化活动定义的有效性。然后,描述了基础研究与应用开发研究测量结果的差异。提出了标准化活动在基础研究中的比重与在应用研究和开发研究中的比重相当的假设。大学和技术授权组织的情况下,电机行业研究論文:基礎研究および応用・開発研究における標準化活動に係る投入資源の計量方法および差異について(田村)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measurement of input resources for standardization activities in basic research and applied and development research, and the difference of the measuring results between the research types
This study explores the methods for measuring standardization activities in basic research and applied and development research. Such methods are supposed to enable more sophisticated management of innovation in organizations. This paper focuses on standardization activities relating to intellectual property, because such activities are thought to be strongly linked to innovation. Universities and technology licensing organizations were chosen as examples of basic research institutions. Companies in the electric machinery industry and information and communication industry were selected as examples of the applied and development research institutions. First, the stability of data over multiple years and the validity of the definition of standardization activities are discussed. Then, the difference in measurement results between basic research, and applied and development research is described. A hypothesis is proposed that the ratio of standardization activities in basic research is as high as that in applied and development research. Case of universities and technology licensing organizations, and the electric machinery industry 研究論文:基礎研究および応用・開発研究における標準化活動に係る投入資源の計量方法および差異について(田村)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Synthesiology
Synthesiology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信