山药和木薯生产的机械化垄作替代垄作

Q4 Environmental Science
S. A. Ennin, E. Otoo, F. Tetteh
{"title":"山药和木薯生产的机械化垄作替代垄作","authors":"S. A. Ennin, E. Otoo, F. Tetteh","doi":"10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cassava seedbed preparation field study was established at Fumesua in the forest and Ejura in the forest-savanna transition agroecologies of Ghana in 2004/2005. The experimental design was split plot with three seed bed preparation methods as the main plots and three nitrogen rates as sub plots, with basal application of 45-90 kg ha-1 P205 - K20 on the fertilized plots. A similar study was conducted on yam seedbed preparation in 2003/2004, with a 23 factorial design. Cassava and yams on ridges resulted in highest root and tuber yields, on both Lixisols in the coastal and forest-savanna transition and Acrisols in the forest agro-ecologies. However, yam tuber yield on mounds was not statistically different from yields on ridges. Number of roots per plant was identified as a major contributory factor to the yield increase of cassava on ridges. Seed bed preparation method was, however, not an important determinant of cassava root yield at high rates of fertilizer application of 90-45-90 kg ha-1 N-P205-K20. Planting on mounds resulted in slender, cylindrically shaped cassava roots and yam tubers, while ridging produced oblong shaped roots and tubers. Weeding and fertilizer application were easier on manual ridging than on manual mounds. The study points to ridging as a potential option to mounding for cassava and yam production, with the feasibility of mechanization of ridges to reduce drudgery associated with roots and tuber crop production in the West African sub-region.","PeriodicalId":39286,"journal":{"name":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","volume":"15 1","pages":"19-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ridging, a Mechanized Alternative to Mounding for Yam and Cassava Production\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Ennin, E. Otoo, F. Tetteh\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A cassava seedbed preparation field study was established at Fumesua in the forest and Ejura in the forest-savanna transition agroecologies of Ghana in 2004/2005. The experimental design was split plot with three seed bed preparation methods as the main plots and three nitrogen rates as sub plots, with basal application of 45-90 kg ha-1 P205 - K20 on the fertilized plots. A similar study was conducted on yam seedbed preparation in 2003/2004, with a 23 factorial design. Cassava and yams on ridges resulted in highest root and tuber yields, on both Lixisols in the coastal and forest-savanna transition and Acrisols in the forest agro-ecologies. However, yam tuber yield on mounds was not statistically different from yields on ridges. Number of roots per plant was identified as a major contributory factor to the yield increase of cassava on ridges. Seed bed preparation method was, however, not an important determinant of cassava root yield at high rates of fertilizer application of 90-45-90 kg ha-1 N-P205-K20. Planting on mounds resulted in slender, cylindrically shaped cassava roots and yam tubers, while ridging produced oblong shaped roots and tubers. Weeding and fertilizer application were easier on manual ridging than on manual mounds. The study points to ridging as a potential option to mounding for cassava and yam production, with the feasibility of mechanization of ridges to reduce drudgery associated with roots and tuber crop production in the West African sub-region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"West African Journal of Applied Ecology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"19-26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-01-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"West African Journal of Applied Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"West African Journal of Applied Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/WAJAE.V15I1.49424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

2004/2005年,在加纳森林的Fumesua和森林-热带草原过渡农业生态的Ejura开展了木薯苗床制备实地研究。试验设计采用三种苗床整备方式为主区、三种施氮方式为副区的分割小区设计,施肥地块基肥45 ~ 90 kg hm -1 P205 - K20。2003/2004年进行了类似的山药苗床制剂研究,采用23因子设计。在沿海和森林-热带草原过渡的Lixisols和森林农业生态的Acrisols上,木薯和山药的根和块茎产量最高。然而,山药块茎在土墩上的产量与在山脊上的产量无统计学差异。单株根数是木薯垄上产量增加的主要因素。然而,在高施肥量90-45-90 kg hm -1 N-P205-K20条件下,种床整理方式不是木薯根产量的重要决定因素。在土墩上种植会产生细长的、圆柱形的木薯根和山药块茎,而在山脊上种植会产生椭圆形的根和块茎。在人工垄上除草和施肥比在人工丘上更容易。该研究指出,在木薯和山药的生产中,垄作是一种潜在的选择,而且在西非分区域,垄作机械化可以减少与块根和块茎作物生产相关的繁重劳动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ridging, a Mechanized Alternative to Mounding for Yam and Cassava Production
A cassava seedbed preparation field study was established at Fumesua in the forest and Ejura in the forest-savanna transition agroecologies of Ghana in 2004/2005. The experimental design was split plot with three seed bed preparation methods as the main plots and three nitrogen rates as sub plots, with basal application of 45-90 kg ha-1 P205 - K20 on the fertilized plots. A similar study was conducted on yam seedbed preparation in 2003/2004, with a 23 factorial design. Cassava and yams on ridges resulted in highest root and tuber yields, on both Lixisols in the coastal and forest-savanna transition and Acrisols in the forest agro-ecologies. However, yam tuber yield on mounds was not statistically different from yields on ridges. Number of roots per plant was identified as a major contributory factor to the yield increase of cassava on ridges. Seed bed preparation method was, however, not an important determinant of cassava root yield at high rates of fertilizer application of 90-45-90 kg ha-1 N-P205-K20. Planting on mounds resulted in slender, cylindrically shaped cassava roots and yam tubers, while ridging produced oblong shaped roots and tubers. Weeding and fertilizer application were easier on manual ridging than on manual mounds. The study points to ridging as a potential option to mounding for cassava and yam production, with the feasibility of mechanization of ridges to reduce drudgery associated with roots and tuber crop production in the West African sub-region.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
West African Journal of Applied Ecology
West African Journal of Applied Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: This research journal has been established by the Ecological Laboratory Unit of the University of Ghana, Accra to publish original papers, invited articles and book reviews in English on general ecology. Papers are peer reviewed by consulting editors. The journal is targeted at scientists, policy makers and the general public. The subject areas to be covered include the following: -Theoretical and Applied Ecology- Environmental Studies- Environmental Management- Population Studies- Sustainable use of Natural Resources- Atmospheric Science- Aquatic Sciences and Oceanography- Terrestrial Ecology- Soil Sciences- Human Settlements- Disaster Preparedness and Disaster Reduction- Sustainable Development- Traditional Knowledge on Biodiversity and its sustainable use- Application in Agriculture and Land Use- Health and Environmental Protection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信