土耳其卡拉苏河重金属污染水质分类的模糊逻辑评价

Q3 Environmental Science

Ekoloji Pub Date : 2013-06-24 DOI:10.5053/EKOLOJI.2013.876

A. Y. Sönmez, Samet Hasiloglu, O. Hisar, Hatice Nur Aras Mehan, H. Kaya

{"title":"土耳其卡拉苏河重金属污染水质分类的模糊逻辑评价","authors":"A. Y. Sönmez, Samet Hasiloglu, O. Hisar, Hatice Nur Aras Mehan, H. Kaya","doi":"10.5053/EKOLOJI.2013.876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ozet Geleneksel su kalite degerlendirme metotlarinda; alt ve ust limitleri iceren ayirim tablolari kullanilmaktadir. Gozlenen konsantrasyon degerleri, ayirim tablolarinda ayni bolge icerisinde yer aliyorsa; degerler limitlere yakin yada uzak olsun ayni esit oneme sahiptir. Ayrica her bir kalite parametresi, tabloda yer alan dort siniftan birisi icerisinde yer almalidir. Bu nedenle, her bir parametrenin farkli siniflarda oldugu durumlarda da belirsizlik meydana gelir. Bu calismada, su kalite siniflandirilmasinin bulanik mantik ile degerlen- dirilmesinin yapildigi bir indeks model kullanilmistir. Bu amac dogrultusunda; Karasu Nehri'nde 5 istasyonda, 12 ay boyunca, toplam 180 adet olcumu yapilarak; Bakir (Cu), Cinko (Zn), Manganez (Mn), Kursun (Pb), Nikel (Ni), Kadmiyum (Cd) ve Demir (Fe) gibi bazi agir metal konsantrasyonlarinin veri kumesi olusturulmustur. Ardindan Karasu Nehri'ndeki agir metal kirliligi icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu kullanilmistir. Sonucta; cevre yonetiminde karar olusturmak icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodunun alternatif bir arac olabilecegi dusunulmustur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Agir metal kirliligi, bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu, Karasu irmagi, su kalite degerlendirme. Abstract Traditional water quality evaluation methods use discrete form that involve upper and lower limits, and the concentrations values are equally important when the values are near to or far away from the limits. Moreover, each quality parameter might belong to one of the four classes; therefore differences of the classes of the parameters may be vagueness. In this study, an index model is purposed for quality evaluation of water quality classification using fuzzy logic. For that purpose, a data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) about several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) was collected from 5 monitoring stations in Karasu River. After that, fuzzy logic assessment method was used to quality evaluation for heavy metal pollution in Karasu stream. In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.","PeriodicalId":11598,"journal":{"name":"Ekoloji","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Logic Evaluation of Water Quality Classification for Heavy Metal Pollution in Karasu Stream, Turkey\",\"authors\":\"A. Y. Sönmez, Samet Hasiloglu, O. Hisar, Hatice Nur Aras Mehan, H. Kaya\",\"doi\":\"10.5053/EKOLOJI.2013.876\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ozet Geleneksel su kalite degerlendirme metotlarinda; alt ve ust limitleri iceren ayirim tablolari kullanilmaktadir. Gozlenen konsantrasyon degerleri, ayirim tablolarinda ayni bolge icerisinde yer aliyorsa; degerler limitlere yakin yada uzak olsun ayni esit oneme sahiptir. Ayrica her bir kalite parametresi, tabloda yer alan dort siniftan birisi icerisinde yer almalidir. Bu nedenle, her bir parametrenin farkli siniflarda oldugu durumlarda da belirsizlik meydana gelir. Bu calismada, su kalite siniflandirilmasinin bulanik mantik ile degerlen- dirilmesinin yapildigi bir indeks model kullanilmistir. Bu amac dogrultusunda; Karasu Nehri'nde 5 istasyonda, 12 ay boyunca, toplam 180 adet olcumu yapilarak; Bakir (Cu), Cinko (Zn), Manganez (Mn), Kursun (Pb), Nikel (Ni), Kadmiyum (Cd) ve Demir (Fe) gibi bazi agir metal konsantrasyonlarinin veri kumesi olusturulmustur. Ardindan Karasu Nehri'ndeki agir metal kirliligi icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu kullanilmistir. Sonucta; cevre yonetiminde karar olusturmak icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodunun alternatif bir arac olabilecegi dusunulmustur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Agir metal kirliligi, bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu, Karasu irmagi, su kalite degerlendirme. Abstract Traditional water quality evaluation methods use discrete form that involve upper and lower limits, and the concentrations values are equally important when the values are near to or far away from the limits. Moreover, each quality parameter might belong to one of the four classes; therefore differences of the classes of the parameters may be vagueness. In this study, an index model is purposed for quality evaluation of water quality classification using fuzzy logic. For that purpose, a data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) about several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) was collected from 5 monitoring stations in Karasu River. After that, fuzzy logic assessment method was used to quality evaluation for heavy metal pollution in Karasu stream. In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekoloji\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekoloji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5053/EKOLOJI.2013.876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekoloji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5053/EKOLOJI.2013.876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

特殊的常规水降解方法；细微的界限和ust界限被用于分隔符的绘画中。集中度，如果它们与月球的绘画在同一比例上；它具有相同的营养植物，接近或远离极限。此外，任何类型的参数，表中的蛋糕类之一都应该放在冰上。这就是为什么在每个参数都属于不同类别的情况下会存在不确定性。Bu calimada，su kalite sin bulanik mantik ile degerlen-dirilmesin yapildigi bir indeks model kullailmistir。这就是观点正确的时候；在卡拉苏河，有5个站，为期12个月，共有180名成年人；某些agir金属浓度的数据框，如bakir（Cu）、Cinko（Zn）、Manganez（Mn）、Kursun（Pb）、Nikel（Ni）、Kadmiyum（Cd）和Demir（Fe）。此外，卡拉苏河中的敏捷金属污染被用作一种合乎逻辑的降解方法。输出我很快就决定了另一种选择。关键词：Agir金属污染，来源逻辑降解法，卡拉苏降解，水质降解。摘要传统的水质评价方法采用离散形式，包括上限和下限，当浓度值接近或远离极限时，浓度值同样重要。没错！但是为了有效地学习英语，我们需要新材料。因此，参数类别的差异可能是模糊的。本研究利用模糊逻辑建立了水质分类的质量评价指标模型。为此，从卡拉苏河的5个监测站收集了关于几种重金属的数据集（12个月，共180次测量），如铜（Cu）、锌（Zn）、锰（Mn）、铅（Pb）、镍（Ni）、镉（Cd）和铁（Fe）。然后，采用模糊逻辑评价方法对卡拉苏河重金属污染进行了质量评价。总之，模糊逻辑评价方法也可以作为环境管理决策的替代工具。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Fuzzy Logic Evaluation of Water Quality Classification for Heavy Metal Pollution in Karasu Stream, Turkey

Ozet Geleneksel su kalite degerlendirme metotlarinda; alt ve ust limitleri iceren ayirim tablolari kullanilmaktadir. Gozlenen konsantrasyon degerleri, ayirim tablolarinda ayni bolge icerisinde yer aliyorsa; degerler limitlere yakin yada uzak olsun ayni esit oneme sahiptir. Ayrica her bir kalite parametresi, tabloda yer alan dort siniftan birisi icerisinde yer almalidir. Bu nedenle, her bir parametrenin farkli siniflarda oldugu durumlarda da belirsizlik meydana gelir. Bu calismada, su kalite siniflandirilmasinin bulanik mantik ile degerlen- dirilmesinin yapildigi bir indeks model kullanilmistir. Bu amac dogrultusunda; Karasu Nehri'nde 5 istasyonda, 12 ay boyunca, toplam 180 adet olcumu yapilarak; Bakir (Cu), Cinko (Zn), Manganez (Mn), Kursun (Pb), Nikel (Ni), Kadmiyum (Cd) ve Demir (Fe) gibi bazi agir metal konsantrasyonlarinin veri kumesi olusturulmustur. Ardindan Karasu Nehri'ndeki agir metal kirliligi icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu kullanilmistir. Sonucta; cevre yonetiminde karar olusturmak icin bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodunun alternatif bir arac olabilecegi dusunulmustur. Anahtar Kelimeler: Agir metal kirliligi, bulanik mantik degerlendirme metodu, Karasu irmagi, su kalite degerlendirme. Abstract Traditional water quality evaluation methods use discrete form that involve upper and lower limits, and the concentrations values are equally important when the values are near to or far away from the limits. Moreover, each quality parameter might belong to one of the four classes; therefore differences of the classes of the parameters may be vagueness. In this study, an index model is purposed for quality evaluation of water quality classification using fuzzy logic. For that purpose, a data set (12 months, total 180 measurements) about several heavy metals such as Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn), Manganese (Mn), Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Cadmium (Cd) and Iron (Fe) was collected from 5 monitoring stations in Karasu River. After that, fuzzy logic assessment method was used to quality evaluation for heavy metal pollution in Karasu stream. In conclusion, it was supposed that fuzzy logic evaluation method may also be used as an alternative tool for decision-making in environmental management.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Ekoloji 环境科学-生态学

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Cessation. Ekoloji is an international journal that focuses on papers that report results from original research on all disciplines engaged in the field of environmental research. We welcome articles that cover the entire spectrum of environmental problems and environmental pollutants, whether chemical, biological or physical. Its coverage extends to all environmentally related issues: air and water pollution, solid waste, noise, recycling, natural resources, ecology and environmental protection. It includes articles on basic and applied environmental pollution research, including environmental engineering and environmental health. All types of pollution are covered, including atmospheric pollutants, detergents, fertilizers, industrial effluents, metals, mining wastes, oil, pesticides, plastics, radioactive materials and sewage. It also includes research papers on ecological and environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity. The primary criteria for publication are scientific quality and ecological/environmental significance. The journal will be read and contributed to by biologists, applied ecologists, environmental scientists, natural resource specialists, environmental engineers, environmental health specialists, agro-ecologists, veterinaries, agricultural engineers, landscape planners and designers. The journal welcomes full "research papers" and short "research notes", only in the English language.