民事诉讼当事人的真实义务:超出其法律规定的要求?乌拉圭民事诉讼法制度的分析

Q4 Social Sciences
María Cecilia Barnech Cuervo
{"title":"民事诉讼当事人的真实义务:超出其法律规定的要求?乌拉圭民事诉讼法制度的分析","authors":"María Cecilia Barnech Cuervo","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.91.2021.pp.45-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": In civil procedure doctrine, veracity, particularly as a duty im-posed on the parties, is highly questioned. Nevertheless, the Uruguayan system especially recognizes it. This dispute and the dilemmas that con-temporary society faces, challenge us about the role that law plays in this situation. This research briefly reviews the state of the issue in to later analyze the relevance and legitimacy of the Uruguayan normative. Finally, why this requirement remains as such, beyond its normative consecration will also be justified from a philosophical perspective. Understanding duties as a form of protection of rights and the search for truth as inherent to the human condition, the duty of veracity of the parties in the process –beyond its express legal consecration– not only would not encounter major objec-tions, but which would appear inexcusable.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deber de veracidad de las partes del proceso civil: ¿una exigencia más allá de su consagración legal?. Análisis a propósito del sistema legal procesal civil uruguayo\",\"authors\":\"María Cecilia Barnech Cuervo\",\"doi\":\"10.46553/prudentia.91.2021.pp.45-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": In civil procedure doctrine, veracity, particularly as a duty im-posed on the parties, is highly questioned. Nevertheless, the Uruguayan system especially recognizes it. This dispute and the dilemmas that con-temporary society faces, challenge us about the role that law plays in this situation. This research briefly reviews the state of the issue in to later analyze the relevance and legitimacy of the Uruguayan normative. Finally, why this requirement remains as such, beyond its normative consecration will also be justified from a philosophical perspective. Understanding duties as a form of protection of rights and the search for truth as inherent to the human condition, the duty of veracity of the parties in the process –beyond its express legal consecration– not only would not encounter major objec-tions, but which would appear inexcusable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prudentia Iuris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.91.2021.pp.45-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.91.2021.pp.45-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在民事诉讼学说中,真实性,特别是作为一种强加给当事人的义务,受到高度质疑。然而,乌拉圭制度特别承认这一点。这种争论和当代社会面临的困境,对我们在这种情况下法律所扮演的角色提出了挑战。本研究简要回顾了该问题的状态,以便稍后分析乌拉圭规范的相关性和合法性。最后,我们将从哲学的角度来解释为什么这一要求在规范性的献祭之外仍然如此。将义务理解为保护权利的一种形式和作为人类条件固有的寻求真理的一种形式,当事各方在这一过程中的真实性义务- -超出其明确的法律规定- -不仅不会遭到重大反对,而且似乎是不可原谅的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deber de veracidad de las partes del proceso civil: ¿una exigencia más allá de su consagración legal?. Análisis a propósito del sistema legal procesal civil uruguayo
: In civil procedure doctrine, veracity, particularly as a duty im-posed on the parties, is highly questioned. Nevertheless, the Uruguayan system especially recognizes it. This dispute and the dilemmas that con-temporary society faces, challenge us about the role that law plays in this situation. This research briefly reviews the state of the issue in to later analyze the relevance and legitimacy of the Uruguayan normative. Finally, why this requirement remains as such, beyond its normative consecration will also be justified from a philosophical perspective. Understanding duties as a form of protection of rights and the search for truth as inherent to the human condition, the duty of veracity of the parties in the process –beyond its express legal consecration– not only would not encounter major objec-tions, but which would appear inexcusable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prudentia Iuris
Prudentia Iuris Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信