美国最高法院的同性婚姻:基于霍尼思-弗雷泽对话的反思

M. Bunchaft
{"title":"美国最高法院的同性婚姻:基于霍尼思-弗雷泽对话的反思","authors":"M. Bunchaft","doi":"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples - often so criticized by Fraser - but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.","PeriodicalId":30170,"journal":{"name":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","volume":"37 1","pages":"233-268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"O Casamento entre Pessoas do Mesmo Sexo na Suprema Corte Norte-Americana: uma reflexão baseada no diálogo entre Honneth-Fraser\",\"authors\":\"M. Bunchaft\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples - often so criticized by Fraser - but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30170,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"233-268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sequencia Estudos Juridicos e Politicos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2016V37N74P233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作旨在分析奥贝格费尔诉霍奇斯案审判中的多数决定,根据阿克塞尔·霍内斯和南希·弗雷泽发展的理论框架及其对司法机构积极态度的解释和批评的影响。有人认为,肯尼迪大法官的投票包含了一套隐含的话语,不仅确立了同性恋未婚夫妇的从属地位——弗雷泽经常如此批评——而且将同性恋身份本质化。运用分析归纳法和批判性女性主义话语分析。此外,它还使用了间接文档。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
O Casamento entre Pessoas do Mesmo Sexo na Suprema Corte Norte-Americana: uma reflexão baseada no diálogo entre Honneth-Fraser
This work aims to assay the majority decision in the trial of the case Obergefell v. Hodges in light of the theoretical framework developed by Axel Honneth and Nancy Fraser and its impact on the interpretation and criticism of proactive attitudes of the judiciary. It is argued that the vote of Justice Kennedy includes a set of implicit discourse that not only establish the subordination status of homosexual unmarried couples - often so criticized by Fraser - but essentializes the gay identity. It uses the analytic induction method and the analysis of critical feminist discourse. Moreover, it also uses the indirect documentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信