信息科学中文档的分类维度

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

Encontros Bibli Pub Date : 2011-04-26 DOI:10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131

Rodrigo Rabello

{"title":"信息科学中文档的分类维度","authors":"Rodrigo Rabello","doi":"10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Considering an epistemological perspective of analysis, a historical-conceptual study of document in Information Science (IS) was proposed to retrace theoretical aspects based on the subjects of History, Diplomacy and Documentation. For that, we guided ourselves on the presuppositions of the history of concepts which allowed us to study synchronic and diachronic aspects of concept by establishing tradition and innovation as anti-ethical categories of analysis. Finally, we tried to show the categorical character of document in the theoretical frame of IS.","PeriodicalId":53201,"journal":{"name":"Encontros Bibli","volume":"16 1","pages":"131-156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2011-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dimensão categórica do documento na ciência da informação\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Rabello\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Considering an epistemological perspective of analysis, a historical-conceptual study of document in Information Science (IS) was proposed to retrace theoretical aspects based on the subjects of History, Diplomacy and Documentation. For that, we guided ourselves on the presuppositions of the history of concepts which allowed us to study synchronic and diachronic aspects of concept by establishing tradition and innovation as anti-ethical categories of analysis. Finally, we tried to show the categorical character of document in the theoretical frame of IS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Encontros Bibli\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"131-156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Encontros Bibli\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Encontros Bibli","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1518-2924.2011V16N31P131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 7

摘要

本文从认识论的角度出发，以历史学、外交学和文献学为基础，对信息科学中的文献进行历史-概念研究。为此，我们以概念史的前提为指导，通过将传统和创新建立为反伦理的分析范畴，使我们能够研究概念的共时性和历时性方面。最后，我们试图在信息系统的理论框架中展示文献的范畴性。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A dimensão categórica do documento na ciência da informação

Considering an epistemological perspective of analysis, a historical-conceptual study of document in Information Science (IS) was proposed to retrace theoretical aspects based on the subjects of History, Diplomacy and Documentation. For that, we guided ourselves on the presuppositions of the history of concepts which allowed us to study synchronic and diachronic aspects of concept by establishing tradition and innovation as anti-ethical categories of analysis. Finally, we tried to show the categorical character of document in the theoretical frame of IS.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Encontros Bibli Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

26 weeks