南极研究国际合作研究趋势分析

Q4 Engineering
Duckhee Jang, Yong-Jin Choi, Jin-Young Kim
{"title":"南极研究国际合作研究趋势分析","authors":"Duckhee Jang, Yong-Jin Choi, Jin-Young Kim","doi":"10.4217/OPR.2016.38.3.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to analyze research activities related to Antarctic science through a bibliographic study and to understand and evaluate the implications. This study is based on 78,445 articles which were retrieved from the Science Citation Index(SCI) database during the period 1998−2015. Through a quantitative analysis and a Social Network Analysis, we made several findings and drew out the implications. First, many countries, in general, have increased multi-national research cooperation in order to enhance research productivity. However, Korea’s cooperative research activity is below the average level. Second, considering the 4 centrality indexes, which are derived from the SNA, Korea had a lower score in terms of centrality indexes. Based on these findings, Korea should formulate a more dynamic or proactive strategy in order to enhance its participation in international research cooperation efforts. Korea, the 10th country to build two or more research bases in Antarctica, should make greater efforts to bring the appropriate level of the phase.","PeriodicalId":35665,"journal":{"name":"Ocean and Polar Research","volume":"38 1","pages":"209-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research Trend Analysis on International Research Collaboration in Regard to Antarctic Studies\",\"authors\":\"Duckhee Jang, Yong-Jin Choi, Jin-Young Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4217/OPR.2016.38.3.209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study is to analyze research activities related to Antarctic science through a bibliographic study and to understand and evaluate the implications. This study is based on 78,445 articles which were retrieved from the Science Citation Index(SCI) database during the period 1998−2015. Through a quantitative analysis and a Social Network Analysis, we made several findings and drew out the implications. First, many countries, in general, have increased multi-national research cooperation in order to enhance research productivity. However, Korea’s cooperative research activity is below the average level. Second, considering the 4 centrality indexes, which are derived from the SNA, Korea had a lower score in terms of centrality indexes. Based on these findings, Korea should formulate a more dynamic or proactive strategy in order to enhance its participation in international research cooperation efforts. Korea, the 10th country to build two or more research bases in Antarctica, should make greater efforts to bring the appropriate level of the phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean and Polar Research\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"209-224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean and Polar Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2016.38.3.209\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean and Polar Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4217/OPR.2016.38.3.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究的目的是通过文献研究来分析与南极科学有关的研究活动,并了解和评估其影响。本研究基于1998 - 2015年间从科学引文索引(SCI)数据库中检索的78,445篇文章。通过定量分析和社会网络分析,我们得出了一些发现,并得出了启示。首先,一般来说,许多国家增加了多国研究合作,以提高研究生产力。但是,韩国的合作研究活动低于平均水平。其次,从SNA得出的4个中心性指数来看,韩国的中心性指数得分较低。以这些研究结果为基础,韩国应该制定更积极主动的战略,以加强参与国际研究合作的努力。作为第10个在南极建立2个以上研究基地的国家,韩国应该为达到适当的水平而努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research Trend Analysis on International Research Collaboration in Regard to Antarctic Studies
The purpose of this study is to analyze research activities related to Antarctic science through a bibliographic study and to understand and evaluate the implications. This study is based on 78,445 articles which were retrieved from the Science Citation Index(SCI) database during the period 1998−2015. Through a quantitative analysis and a Social Network Analysis, we made several findings and drew out the implications. First, many countries, in general, have increased multi-national research cooperation in order to enhance research productivity. However, Korea’s cooperative research activity is below the average level. Second, considering the 4 centrality indexes, which are derived from the SNA, Korea had a lower score in terms of centrality indexes. Based on these findings, Korea should formulate a more dynamic or proactive strategy in order to enhance its participation in international research cooperation efforts. Korea, the 10th country to build two or more research bases in Antarctica, should make greater efforts to bring the appropriate level of the phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean and Polar Research
Ocean and Polar Research Engineering-Ocean Engineering
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信