亚里士多德的思维模式是口吃研究和理论的基础。

M. L. Goodgoll
{"title":"亚里士多德的思维模式是口吃研究和理论的基础。","authors":"M. L. Goodgoll","doi":"10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a direct result of the prevalence of Aristotelian thinking in the field of speech pathology, research and theorizing has tended to ignore the individual, his unique characteristics and differences, and to concentrate on what is common between individuals. The therapist is therefore faced with being unable to utilize effectively any particular theory, since none of them explains the unique attributes of the individual case with which he has to deal. A non-Aristotelian approach to research on stuttering seems to hold more promise of attaining an eventual understanding of the individual stutterer.","PeriodicalId":77232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the South African Speech and Hearing Association","volume":"16 1 1","pages":"26-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1969-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The aristotelian mode of thought underlying research and theorizing in the field of stuttering.\",\"authors\":\"M. L. Goodgoll\",\"doi\":\"10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a direct result of the prevalence of Aristotelian thinking in the field of speech pathology, research and theorizing has tended to ignore the individual, his unique characteristics and differences, and to concentrate on what is common between individuals. The therapist is therefore faced with being unable to utilize effectively any particular theory, since none of them explains the unique attributes of the individual case with which he has to deal. A non-Aristotelian approach to research on stuttering seems to hold more promise of attaining an eventual understanding of the individual stutterer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the South African Speech and Hearing Association\",\"volume\":\"16 1 1\",\"pages\":\"26-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1969-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the South African Speech and Hearing Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the South African Speech and Hearing Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/SAJCD.V16I1.431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚里士多德思想在言语病理学领域盛行的直接结果是,研究和理论化倾向于忽视个体及其独特的特征和差异,而把注意力集中在个体之间的共同点上。因此,治疗师面临着无法有效利用任何特定理论的问题,因为它们都不能解释他必须处理的个案的独特属性。一种非亚里士多德式的研究口吃的方法似乎更有希望最终理解个体口吃者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The aristotelian mode of thought underlying research and theorizing in the field of stuttering.
As a direct result of the prevalence of Aristotelian thinking in the field of speech pathology, research and theorizing has tended to ignore the individual, his unique characteristics and differences, and to concentrate on what is common between individuals. The therapist is therefore faced with being unable to utilize effectively any particular theory, since none of them explains the unique attributes of the individual case with which he has to deal. A non-Aristotelian approach to research on stuttering seems to hold more promise of attaining an eventual understanding of the individual stutterer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信