量表很重要:双相抑郁评定量表(BDRS)的必要性

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
M. Berk, G. S. Malhi, P. B. Mitchell, C. M. Cahill, A. C. Carman, D. Hadzi-Pavlovic, M. T. Hawkins, M. Tohen
{"title":"量表很重要:双相抑郁评定量表(BDRS)的必要性","authors":"M. Berk,&nbsp;G. S. Malhi,&nbsp;P. B. Mitchell,&nbsp;C. M. Cahill,&nbsp;A. C. Carman,&nbsp;D. Hadzi-Pavlovic,&nbsp;M. T. Hawkins,&nbsp;M. Tohen","doi":"10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Objective: </b> To briefly review the clinical and biological distinctions between unipolar and bipolar depression critiquing in particular currently available depression rating scales and discuss the need for a new observer-rated scale tailored to bipolar depression.</p><p><b>Method: </b> Relevant literature pertaining to the symptomatic differences between bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder as well as their measurement using existing assessment scales was identified by computerized searches and reviews of scientific journals known to the authors.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Bipolar depression is distinct from unipolar depression in terms of phenomenology and clinical characteristics. These distinguishing features can be used to identify bipolarity in patients that present with recurrent depressive episodes. This is important because current self-report and observer-rated scales are optimized for unipolar depression, and hence limited in their ability to accurately assess bipolar depression.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> The development of a specific bipolar depression rating scale will improve the assessment of bipolar depression in both research and clinical settings and assist the development of better treatments and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":"110 s422","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x","citationCount":"61","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scale matters: the need for a Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS)\",\"authors\":\"M. Berk,&nbsp;G. S. Malhi,&nbsp;P. B. Mitchell,&nbsp;C. M. Cahill,&nbsp;A. C. Carman,&nbsp;D. Hadzi-Pavlovic,&nbsp;M. T. Hawkins,&nbsp;M. Tohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Objective: </b> To briefly review the clinical and biological distinctions between unipolar and bipolar depression critiquing in particular currently available depression rating scales and discuss the need for a new observer-rated scale tailored to bipolar depression.</p><p><b>Method: </b> Relevant literature pertaining to the symptomatic differences between bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder as well as their measurement using existing assessment scales was identified by computerized searches and reviews of scientific journals known to the authors.</p><p><b>Results: </b> Bipolar depression is distinct from unipolar depression in terms of phenomenology and clinical characteristics. These distinguishing features can be used to identify bipolarity in patients that present with recurrent depressive episodes. This is important because current self-report and observer-rated scales are optimized for unipolar depression, and hence limited in their ability to accurately assess bipolar depression.</p><p><b>Conclusion: </b> The development of a specific bipolar depression rating scale will improve the assessment of bipolar depression in both research and clinical settings and assist the development of better treatments and interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\"110 s422\",\"pages\":\"39-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x\",\"citationCount\":\"61\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2004.00412.x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 61

摘要

目的:简要回顾单相抑郁症和双相抑郁症的临床和生物学区别,特别是目前可用的抑郁评定量表,并讨论针对双相抑郁症量身定制的新的观察者评定量表的必要性。方法:通过计算机检索和回顾作者所知的科学期刊,确定有关双相情感障碍和单相情感障碍症状差异的相关文献以及使用现有评估量表的测量方法。结果:双相抑郁症在症状和临床特征上与单极抑郁症不同。这些显著特征可用于识别复发性抑郁发作患者的双极性。这一点很重要,因为目前的自我报告和观察者评定量表是针对单相抑郁症进行优化的,因此它们在准确评估双相抑郁症方面的能力有限。结论:开发一种特定的双相抑郁评定量表将改善双相抑郁的研究和临床评估,并有助于开发更好的治疗和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scale matters: the need for a Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS)

Objective: To briefly review the clinical and biological distinctions between unipolar and bipolar depression critiquing in particular currently available depression rating scales and discuss the need for a new observer-rated scale tailored to bipolar depression.

Method: Relevant literature pertaining to the symptomatic differences between bipolar disorder and unipolar disorder as well as their measurement using existing assessment scales was identified by computerized searches and reviews of scientific journals known to the authors.

Results: Bipolar depression is distinct from unipolar depression in terms of phenomenology and clinical characteristics. These distinguishing features can be used to identify bipolarity in patients that present with recurrent depressive episodes. This is important because current self-report and observer-rated scales are optimized for unipolar depression, and hence limited in their ability to accurately assess bipolar depression.

Conclusion: The development of a specific bipolar depression rating scale will improve the assessment of bipolar depression in both research and clinical settings and assist the development of better treatments and interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信